Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2009; 117(9): 522-557
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239559
Guidelines

© J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Medical Antihyperglycaemic Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[*]

Update of the evidence-based guideline of the German Diabetes AssociationS. Matthaei1 , R. Bierwirth2 , A. Fritsche3 , B. Gallwitz3 , H.-U. Häring3 , H.-G. Joost4 , M. Kellerer5 , Ch. Kloos6 , T. Kunt7 , M. Nauck8 , G. Schernthaner9 , E. Siegel10 , F. Thienel1
  • 1Diabetes-Zentrum Quakenbrück, Quakenbrück
  • 2Diabetes-Schwerpunktpraxis, Essen
  • 3Med. Klinik IV, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen
  • 4Deutsches Institut für Ernährungsforschung, Bergholz-Rehbrücke
  • 5Zentrum für Innere Medizin I/Diabetologie & Endokrinologie, Marienhospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart
  • 6Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universität Jena, Jena
  • 7Privatärztliche Praxis, Berlin
  • 8Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg, Bad Lauterberg
  • 9Krankenhaus Rudolfstiftung/1. Med. Abteilung, Wien
  • 10St. Vincentius Kliniken I/Endokrinologie & Gastroenterologie, Karlsruhe
Further Information

Publication History

Guideline originally published 05.2003

Guideline last updated 10.2008

Publication Date:
29 October 2009 (online)

Contents

Foreword 522 1. Antihyperglycaemic treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus 523 1.1 Oral antidiabetic drugs 523 1.1.1 Non-β-cytotropic oral antidiabetic drugs 523 1.1.1.1 Metformin 523 1.1.1.2 Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (acarbose, miglitol) 526 1.1.1.3 PPAR-γ-ligands (rosiglitazone, pioglitazone) 528 1.1.1.4 Combination therapy with non-β-cytotropic oral antidiabetic drugs 531 1.1.2 β-cytotropic medications: potassium channel blockers 531 1.1.2.1 Sulphonylureas 531 1.1.2.2 Sulphonylurea analogues (repaglinide, nateglinide) 533 1.1.2.3 Combination therapy with non-β-cytotropic oral antidiabetic drugs 534 1.1.3 DPP-4 inhibitors 534 1.2. Injectable therapies 538 1.2.1 Incretin mimetics (exenatide) 538 1.2.2 Insulin therapy 539 1.2.2.1 Indication 539 1.2.2 2 Blood glucose self-monitoring 540 1.2.2.3 Application 540 1.2.2.4 Insulin administration 540 1.2.2.5 Conventional therapy 540 1.2.2.6 Intensified conventional insulin therapy 541 1.2.2.7 Combination treatment with insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs 541 1.2.2.8 Side-effects of insulin therapy 542 2. Flowchart of antihyperglycaemic treatment of type 2 diabetes 543 2.1 Legend to flowchart 544 3. References 545 4. Appendix 1: Statement by the DDG regarding the results of the ACCORD and ADVANCE trials 553

1 Note: This updated version takes into account all evidence that was published prior to the end of 06/2008, as well as all new approvals/indications prior to the same date.

References

  • 1 Abraira C, Henderson WG, Colwell JA. et al . Response to intensive therapy steps and to glipizide dose in combination with insulin in type 2 diabetes. VA feasibility study on glycemic control and complications (VA CSDM).  Diabetes Care. 1998;  21 574-579 Evidence class Ib 
  • 2 Ahrén B, Gomis R, Standl E. et al . Twelve- and 52-week efficacy of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor LAF237 in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2004;  27 2874-2880 Evidence class Ib 
  • 3 Amori RE, Lau J, Pittas AG. Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.  JAMA. 2007;  298 194-206 Evidence class Ia 
  • 4 Anderson JH, Brunelle RL, Keohane P. et al . Mealtime treatment with an insulin analog improves postprandial hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Multicenter Insulin Lispro Study Group.  Arch Intern Med. 1997;  157 1249-1255 Evidence class IIa 
  • 5 Anfosso F, Chromiki N, Alessi M. et al . Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 synthesis in the human hepatoma cell line Hep G2: Metformin inhibits the stimulating effect of insulin.  J Clin Invest. 1993;  91 2185-2193 Evidence class IIa 
  • 6 Aschner P, Kipnes MS, Lunceford JK. et al . Sitagliptin Study 021 Group. Effect of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin as monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 2632-2637 Evidence class Ib 
  • 7 Aviles-Santa L, Sinding J, Raskin P. Effects of metformin in patients with poorly controlled, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;  131 182-188 Evidence class Ib 
  • 8 Bachmann W, Lotz N, Mehnert H. et al . Effectiveness of combined treatment with glibenclamide and insulin in secondary sulfonylurea failure. A controlled multicenter double-blind clinical trial.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1988;  113 631-636 Evidence class IIa 
  • 9 Bailey CJ, Bagdonas A, Rubes J. et al . Rosiglitazone/Metformin fixed-dose combination compared with uptitrated metformin alone in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.  Clin Ther. 2005;  27 1548-1561 Evidence class Ib 
  • 10 Bailey CJ, Turner RC. Metformin.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  334 574-579 Evidence class IV 
  • 11 Bakris G, Viberti G, Weston WM. et al . Rosglitazone reduces urinary albumin excretion in type II diabetes.  Journal of Human Hypertension. 2003;  17 7-12 Evidence class Ib 
  • 12 Balfour JA, Plosker GL. Rosiglitazone.  Drugs. 1999;  57 921-930 Evidence class IV 
  • 13 Barnett A. DPP-4 inhibitors and their potential role in the management of type 2 diabetes.  Int J Clin Pract. 2006;  60 1454-1470 Evidence class IV 
  • 14 Baron AD, Eckel RH, Kolterman OG. The effect of short-term alpha-glucosidase inhibition on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in type-2-diabetics.  Metabolism. 1987;  36 409-415 Evidence class II b 
  • 15 Baron AD, Neumann C. PROTECT Interim Results: A large multicenter study of patients with type-2 diabetes.  Clinical Therapeutics. 1997;  19 282-295 Evidence class II a 
  • 16 Bergman AJ, Stevens C, Zhou Y. et al . Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of multiple oral doses of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy male volunteers.  Clin Ther. 2006;  28 55-72 Evidence class Ib 
  • 17 Berlie HD, Kalus JS, Jaber LA. Thiazolidinediones and the risk of edema: a meta-analysis.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;  76 279-289 Evidence class Ia 
  • 18 Blonde L, Klein EJ, Han J. et al . Interim analysis of the effects of exenatide treatment on A1C, weight and cardiovascular risk factors over 82 weeks in 314 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;  8 436-447 Evidence class IIb 
  • 19 Bolli G, Dotta F, Rochotte E. et al . Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin vs. pioglitazone when added to metformin: A 24-week randomized double blind study.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;  10 82-90 Evidence class Ib 
  • 20 Bosi E, Camisasca RP, Collober C. et al . Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control over 24 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.  Diabetes Care. 2007;  30 890-895 Evidence class Ib 
  • 21 Braun D, Schönher U, Mitzkat HJ. Efficacy of acarbose monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind study conducted in general practice.  Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1996;  3 275-280 Evidence class Ib 
  • 22 Bretzel RG, Nuber U, Landgraf W. et al . Once-daily basal insulin glargine versus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro in people with type 2 diabetes on oral hypoglycemic agents (APOLLO): an open randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2008;  371 1073-1084 Evidence class Ib 
  • 23 Buse JB, Henry RR, Han J. et al . Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in sulfonylurea-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2004;  27 2628-2635 Evidence class Ib 
  • 24 Buse JB, Klonoff DC, Nielsen LL. et al . Metabolic effects of two years of exenatide treatment on diabetes, obesity, and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes: An interim analysis of data from the open-label, uncontrolled extension of three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.  Clin Ther. 2007;  29 139-153 Evidence class IIb 
  • 25 Calle-Pascual A, Garcia-Honduvilla J, Martin-Alvarez PJ. Influence of 16 week monotherapy with acarbose on cardiovascular risk factors in obese subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a controlled double blind study with placebo.  Diab Metab. 1996;  22 201-202 Evidence class II a 
  • 26 Campbell IW, Howlett HCS. Worldwide experience of metformin as an effective glucose-lowering agent: a metaanalysis.  Diabetes Metab Rev. 1995;  11 557-562 Evidence class Ia 
  • 27 Carey DG, Cowin GJ, Galloway GJ. et al . Sensitivity effect of rosiglitazone on insulin and body composition in type 2 diabetic patients.  Obes Res. 2002;  10 1008-1015 Evidence class Ib 
  • 28 Ceriello A, Johns D, Widel M. et al . Comparison of effect of pioglitazone with metformin or sulfonylurea (monotherapy and combination therapy) on postload glycemia and composite insulin sensitivity index during an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 266-272 Evidence class Ib 
  • 29 Ceriello A, Taboga C, Tonutti L. et al . Post-meal coagulation activation in diabetes mellitus: the effect of acarbose.  Diabetologia. 1996;  39 469-473 Evidence class I b 
  • 30 Chan NN, Brain HP, Feher MD. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: a rare or very rare clinical entity?.  Diabetes Care. 1998;  21 1659-1663 Evidence class IIa 
  • 31 Charbonnel B, Karasik A, Liu J. et al . Sitagliptin Study 020 Group.  Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 2638-2634 Evidence class Ib 
  • 32 Charbonnel BH, Matthews DR, Schernthaner G. et al . A long-term comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial.  Diabet Med. 2004;  22 399-405 Evidence class Ib 
  • 33 Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Hunt JA. et al . The efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus A multicenter controlled clinical trial.  Ann Intern Med. 1994;  121 928-935 Evidence class Ib 
  • 34 Chiasson JL, Nathan DM, Josse RG. et al . The effect of acarbose on insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.  Diabetes Care. 1996;  19 1190 Evidence class Ib 
  • 35 Chiasson JL, Gomis R, Hanefeld M. et al . Acarbose can prevent the progression of impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes mellitus: The STOP-NIDDM Trial.  The Lancet. 2002;  359 2072-2077 Evidence class Ib 
  • 36 Chilcott J, Tappendenden P, Jones ML. et al . A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Clin Ther. 2001;  23 1792-1823 Evidence class IV 
  • 37 Chow CC, Tsang LW, Sorensen JP. et al . Comparison of insulin with or without continuation of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatmentt of secondary failure in NIDDM patients.  Diabetes Care. 1995;  18 307-314 Evidence class IIa 
  • 38 Chu J, Abbasi F, Lamendola C. et al . Improvements in vascular and inflammatory markers in rosiglitazone-treated insulin-resistant subjects are independent of changes in insulin sensitivity or glycemic control.  Diabetes. 2003;  52 325-3OR Evidence class IIb 
  • 39 Cusi K, DeFronzo RA. Metformin: a review of its metabolic effects.  Diabetes Reviews. 1998;  6 89-131 Evidence class IV 
  • 40 Dabrowski M, Wahl P, Holmes WE. et al . Effect of repaglinide on cloned beta cell, cardiac and smooth muscle types of ATP-sensitive potassium channels.  Diabetologia. 2001;  44 747-756 Evidence class IV 
  • 41 Dailey GE, Noor MA, Park JS. et al . Glycemic control with glyburide/metformin tablets in combination with rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind trial.  Am J Med. 2004;  116 223-229 Evidence class Ib 
  • 42 Danchin N, Charpentier G, Ledru F. et al . Role of previous treatment with sulfonylureas in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from a nationwide French registry.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005;  21 143-149 Evidence class III 
  • 43 Davis SN, Johns D, Maggs D. et al . Exploring the substitution of exenatide for insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin in combination with oral antidiabetes agents.  Diabetes Care. 2007;  30 2767-2772 Evidence class III 
  • 44 DeFronzo RA, Ratner RE, Han J. et al . Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control and weight over 30 weeks in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 1092-1100 Evidence class Ib 
  • 45 DeFronzo R, Goodman AM. Efficacy of Metformin in NIDDM patients poorly controlled on diet alone or diet plus sulfonlyurea.  N Engl J Med. 1995;  333 541-549 Evidence class Ib 
  • 46 Dejager S, Razac S, Foley JE. et al . Vildagliptin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study.  Horm Metab Res. 2007;  39 218-223 Evidence class Ib 
  • 47 Del Prato S, Vigili de Kreutzenberg S, Riccio A. et al . Partial recovery of insulin secretion and action after combined insulin-sulfonylurea treatment in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral agents.  Diabetologia. 1990;  33 688-695 Evidence class IIb 
  • 48 De Luis DA, Aller R, Terroba C. et al . Effect of repaglinide addition to NPH insulin monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 1844-1845 Evidence class Ib 
  • 49 Derosa G, Cicero AFG, d’Angelo A. et al . Thiazolidinedione effects on blood pressure in diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome treated with glimepiride.  Hypertens Res. 2005;  28 917-924 Evidence class Ib 
  • 50 Derosa G, Gaddi AV, Ciccarelli L. et al . Long-term effect of glimepiride and rosiglitazone on non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors in metformin-treated patients affected by metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.  J Int Med Res. 2005;  33 284-294 Evidence class Ib 
  • 51 Derosa G, Gaddi AV, Piccinni MN. et al . Antithrombotic effects of rosiglitazone-metformin versus glimepiride-metformin combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome.  Pharmacotherapy. 2005;  25 637-645 Evidence class Ib 
  • 52 Derosa G, Gaddi AV, Piccinni MN. et al . Differential effect of glimepirid and rosiglitazone on metabolic control of type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.  Diab Obes Metab. 2006;  8 197-205 Evidence class Ib 
  • 53 Diamond GA, Bax L, Kaul S. Uncertain effects of rosiglitazone on the risk for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death.  Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;  147 578-581 Evidence class Ia 
  • 54 Dills DG, Schneider J. Clinical evaluation of glimepiride versus glyburide in NIDDM in a double-blind comparative study.  Horm Metab Res. 1996;  28 426-429 Evidence class Ib 
  • 55 Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ. et al . Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2005;  366 1279-1289 Evidence class Ib 
  • 56 Draeger KE, Wernicke-Panten K, Lomp H-J. et al . Long-term treatment of type 2 diabetic patients with the new oral antidiabetic agent glimepiride (Amaryl®): a double-blind comparison with glibenclamide.  Horm Metab Res. 1996;  28 419-425 Evidence class Ib 
  • 57 Dunn CJ, Faulds D. Nateglinide.  Drugs. 2000;  60 607-615 Evidence class IV 
  • 58 Dunning BE. New non-sulfonylurea insulin secretagogues.  Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1997;  6 1041-1048 Evidence class IV 
  • 59 Ebeling P, Teppo AM, Koistinen HA. et al . Concentration of the complement activation product, acylation-stimulating protein, is related to C-reactive protein in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Metabolism. 2001;  50 283-287 , Evidence class Ib 
  • 60 Einhorn D, Rendell M, Rosenzweig J. et al . Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group.  Clin Ther. 2000;  22 1395-1409 Evidence class Ib 
  • 61 Emanuele N, Azad N, Abraira C. et al . Effect of intensive glycemic control on fibrinogen, lipids, and lipoproteins: Veterans affairs cooperative study in type II diabetes mellitus.  Arch Intern Med. 1998;  158 2485-2490 Evidence class Ib 
  • 62 Esposito K, Ciotola M, Carleo D. et al . Effect of rosiglitazone on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with the metabolic syndrome.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 1071-1076 Evidence class Ib 
  • 63 Eurich DT, McAlister FA, Blackburn DF. et al . Benefits and harms of antidiabetic agents in patients with diabetes and heart failure: systematic review.  British Medical Journal. 2007;  335 497-507 Evidence class Ia 
  • 64 European Diabetes Policy Group . A desktop guide to type 2 diabetes mellitus. European Diabetes Policy Group 1999.  Diabet Med. 1999;  16 716-730 Evidence class IV 
  • 65 Evans JM, Donnelly LA, Emslie-Smith AM. et al . Metformin and reduced risk of cancer in diabetic patients.  Brit Med J. 2005;  330 1304-1305 Evidence class IV 
  • 66 Evans JM, Ogston SA, Emslie-Smith A. et al . Risk of mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of patients treated with sulfonylureas and metformin.  Diabetologia. 2006;  49 930-936 Evidence class III 
  • 67 FachInfo Actos ® . Bundesverband der Pharmazeutischen Industrie: Zusammenfassung der Merkmale des Arzneimittels Actos®. Oktober 2000. 2000;  1-3 Evidence class IV 
  • 68 Fineman MS, Shen LZ, Taylor K. et al . Effectiveness of progressive dose-escalation of exenatide (exendin-4) in reducing dose-limiting side effects in subjects with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;  20 411-417 Evidence class Ib 
  • 69 Fineman MS, Bicsak TA, Shen LZ. et al . Effect on glycemic control of exenatide (synthetic exendin-4) additive to existing metformin and/or sulfonylurea treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2003;  26 2370-2377 Evidence class Ib 
  • 70 Fischer S, Hanefeld M, Spengler M. et al . European study on dose-response relationship of acarbose as a first-line drug in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: efficacy and safety of low and high doses.  Acta Diabetol. 1998;  35 34-40 Evidence class I b 
  • 71 Fisman EZ, Tenenbaum A, Boyko V. et al . Oral antidiabetic treatment in patients with coronary disease: Time-related increased mortality on combined glyburide/metformin therapy over a 7.7-year follow-up.  Clin Cardiol. 2001;  24 151-158 Evidence class III 
  • 72 Fonseca V, Grunberger G, Gupta S. et al . Addition of nateglinide to rosiglitazone monotherapy suppresses mealtime hyperglycemia and improves overall glycemic control.  Diab Care. 2003;  26 1685-1690 Evidence class Ib 
  • 73 Fonseca V, Rosenstock J, Patwardhan R. et al . Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.  JAMA. 2000;  283 1695-1702 Evidence class Ib 
  • 74 Fonseca V, Schweizer A, Albrecht D. et al . Addition of vildagliptin to insulin improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetologia. 2007;  50 1148-1155 Evidence class Ib 
  • 75 Freed MI, Ratner R, Marcovina SM. et al . Effects of rosiglitazone alone and in combination with atorvastatin on the metabolic abnormalities in type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Am J Cardiol. 2002;  90 947-952 Evidence class Ib 
  • 76 Fritsche A, Schmülling RM, Häring HU. et al . Intensive insulin therapy combined with metformin in obese type 2 diabetic patients.  Acta Diabetol. 2000;  37 13-18 Evidence class IIa 
  • 77 Fritsche A, Schweitzer MA, Häring HU. et al 4001 Study Group . Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.  A randomized, controlled trial: Ann Intern Med. 2003;  138 952-959 Evidence class Ib 
  • 78 Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N. et al . Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  348 383-393 Evidence class Ib 
  • 79 Gaede P, Andersen HL, Parving HH. et al . Effect of a Multifactorial intervention on Mortality in Type Diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  358 580-591 Evidence class Ib 
  • 80 Gallwitz B. Sitagliptin: Profile of a novel DPP-4 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.  Drugs Today (Barc). 2007;  43 13-25 Evidence class IV 
  • 81 Garber A, Duncan T, Goodman A. et al . Efficacy of metformin in type-II diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial.  Am J Med. 1997;  102 491-497 Evidence class IIa 
  • 82 Garber A, Klein E, Bruce S. et al . Metformin-glibenclamide versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.  Diab Obes Metab. 2006;  8 156-163 Evidence class Ib 
  • 83 Garber AJ, Schweizer A, Baron MA. et al . Vildagliptin in combination with pioglitazone improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes failing thiazolidinedione monotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;  9 166-174 Evidence class Ib 
  • 84 Garratt KN, Brady PA, Hassinger NL. et al . Sulfonylurea drugs increase early mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus after direct angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;  33 119-124 Evidence class III 
  • 85 Gin H, Freyburger C, Boisseau M. et al . Effect of metformin on platelet hyperaggregation in the insulin-dependent diabetic.  Diabete Metab. 1988;  14 596-600 Evidence class IIa 
  • 86 Goldberg RB, Einhorn D, Lucas CP. et al . A randomized placebo-controlled trial of repaglinide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 1998;  21 1897-1903 Evidence class Ib 
  • 87 Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA. et al . A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 1547-1554 Evidence class Ib 
  • 88 Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA. et al . Tests of glycemia in diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2004;  27 1761-1773 Evidence class IV 
  • 89 Goudswaard AN, Furlong NJ, Rutten GE. et al . Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;  18 SD003418 Evidence class Ia 
  • 90 Gulliford M, Latinovic R. Mortality in type 2 diabetic subjects prescribed metformin and sulfonylurea drugs in combination: cohort study.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;  20 239-245 Evidence class III 
  • 91 Haak T, Tiengo A, Draeger E. et al . Lower within-subject variability of fasting blood glucose and reduced weight gain with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005;  7 56-64 Evidence class Ib 
  • 92 Haffner S, Temprosa M, Crandall J. et al . Intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin on inflammation and coagulation in participants with impaired glucose tolerance.  Diabetes. 2005;  54 1566-1572 Evidence class Ib 
  • 93 Hamann A, Garcia-Puig J, Paul G. et al . Comparison of fixed-dose rosiglitazone/metformin combination therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin in overweight individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2008;  116 6-13 Evidence class Ib 
  • 94 Hamelbeck H, Klein W, Zoltobrocki M. et al . Glibenclamide-insulin combination in management of secondary failure of sulfonyl-urea medication.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1982;  107 1581-1583 Evidence class IV 
  • 95 Hanefeld M, Brunetti P, Schernthaner GH. et al . One-year glycemic control with a sulfonylurea plus pioglitazone versus a sulfonylurea plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diab Care. 2004;  27 141-147 Evidence class Ib 
  • 96 Hanefeld M, Pfützner A, Forst T. et al . Glycemic control and treatment failure with pioglitazone versus glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 42-month, open-label, observational, primary care study.  Curr Med Res Op. 2006;  22 1211-1215 Evidence class IIa 
  • 97 Hanefeld M, Göke B. Combining pioglitazone with sulphonylurea or metformin in the management of type 2 diabetes.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2000a;  108 ((Suppl 2)) 256-266 Evidence class IV 
  • 98 Hanefeld M, Bouter KP, Dickinson S. et al . Rapid and short-acting mealtime insulin secretion with nateglinide controls both prandial and mean glycemia.  Diabetes Care. 2000b;  23 202-207 Evidence class Ib 
  • 99 Hasche H, Mertes G, Bruns C. et al . Effects of acarbose treatment in type-2 diabetic patients under dietary training. A multicentre, double blind, place-controlled 2-year study.  Diab Nutr Metab. 1999;  12 277-285 Evidence class Ib 
  • 100 Heine RJ, Van Gaal LF, Johns D. et al . Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial.  Ann Intern Med. 2005;  143 559-569 Evidence class Ib 
  • 101 Hermann BL, Schatz H, Pfeiffer A. Kontinuierliche Blutglucosemessung. Der AkuteffECt von Acarbose auf die Blutglucoseschwankungen.  Med Klin. 1998;  93 651-655 Evidence class IIb 
  • 102 Hermann LS, Schersten B, Bitzen PO. et al . Therapeutic comparison of metformin and sulfonylurea, alone and in various combinations A double-blind controlled study.  Diabetes Care. 1994;  17 1100-1109 Evidence class Ia 
  • 103 Hermansen K, Davies M, Derezinski T. et al . A 26-week, randomized, parallel, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin as add-on therapy to oral glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 1269-1274 Evidence class Ib 
  • 104 Hermansen K, Kipnes M, Luo E. et al Sitagliptin Study 035 Group . Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007;  9 733-745 Evidence class Ib 
  • 105 Hoffmann J, Spengler M. Efficacy of 24-week monotherapy with acarbose, glibenclamide or placebo in NIDDM patients.  Diabetes Care. 1994;  17 561-566 Evidence class Ib 
  • 106 Holman RR, Cull CA, Turner RC. A randomised double-blind trial of Acarbose in type-2 diabetes shows improved glycemic control over 3 years (UKPD Study 44).  Diabetes Care. 1999;  22 960-964 Evidence class Ib 
  • 107 Holman RR, Thorne KI, Farmer AJ. et al . Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 1716-1730 Evidence class Ib 
  • 108 Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA. et al . 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes.  N Engl J Med. 2008;  359 1 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470. Evidence class Ib 
  • 109 Holstein A, Plaschke A, Egberts E-H. Lower incidence of severe hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glimepiride versus glibenclamide.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;  17 467-473 Evidence class III 
  • 110 Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H. et al . Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes – an interim analysis.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 1 doi 10.1056/NEJMoa073394. Evidence class Ib 
  • 111 Horton ES, Clinkingbeard C, Gatlin M. et al . Nateglinide alone and in combination with metformin improves glycemic control by reducing mealtime glucose levels in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2000;  23 1660-1665 Evidence class Ib 
  • 112 Horvath K, Jeitler K, Berghold A. et al . Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (Review).  Cochrane Database of systematic Review. 2007,;  (Issue 2,) Art. No. CD005613. DO1:10, 1002/14651858, CD005613. pub3 
  • 113 Huizar JF, Gonzalez LA, Alderman J. et al . Sulfonylureas attenuate electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation during acute myocardial infarction in diabetics.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;  42 1017-1021
  • 114 Jain SK, Nagi DK, Slavin BM. et al . Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic subjects suppresses plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) activity and proinsulin-like molecules independently of glycemic control.  Diabet Med. 1993;  10 27-32 Evidence class Ib 
  • 115 Jansen JP. Self-moitoring of glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Bayesian meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparisons.  Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;  22 671-681 Evidence class Ia 
  • 116 Jönsson A, Rydberg T, ECberg G. et al . Slow elimination of glyburide in NIDDM subjects.  Diabetes Care. 1994;  17 142-145 Evidence class IV 
  • 117 Jönsson A, Hallengren B, Rydberg T. et al . Effects of glibenclamide and its active metabolites in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2001;  3 403-409 Evidence class IV 
  • 118 Johnson JA, Majumdar SR, Simpson SH. et al . Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin compared with sulfonylurea monotherapy in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2002;  25 2244-2248 Evidence class III 
  • 119 Johnson JA, Simpson SH, Toth EL. et al . Reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with metformin use in subjects with Type 2 diabetes.  Diabet Med. 2005;  22 497-502 Evidence class III 
  • 120 Johnston P, Sheu WH, Hollenbeck CB. et al . Effect of metformin on carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism in NIDDM patients.  Diabetes Care. 1990;  13 1-8 Evidence class IIa 
  • 121 Johnston PS, Coniff RF, Hoogwerf BJ. et al . Effects of the carbohydrase inhibitor miglitol in sulfonylurea-treated NIDDM patients.  Diabetes Care. 1994;  17 20-29 Evidence class Ib 
  • 122 Jovanovic L, Dailey G, Huang WC. et al . Repaglinide in type 2 diabetes: a 24-week fixed dose efficacy and safety study.  J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;  40 49-57 Evidence class Ib 
  • 123 Johnson JL, Wolf SL, Kabadi UM. Efficacy of insulin and sulfonylurea combination therapy in type II diabetes. A meta-analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled trials.  Arch Intern Med. 1996;  156 259-264 Evidence class Ia 
  • 124 Jung HS, Youn BS, Cho YM. et al . The effects of rosiglitazone an metformin on the plasma concentrations of resistin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Metabolism. 2005;  54 314-320 Evidence class Ib 
  • 125 Kado S, Murakami T, Aoki A. et al . Effect of acarbose on postprandial lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Diab Res and Clin Pract. 1998;  41 49-55 Evidence class IIb 
  • 126 Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA. et al . Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 2427-2443 Evidence class Ib 
  • 127 Kalfhaus J, Berger M. Insulin treatment with preprandial injections of regular insulin in middle-aged type 2 diabetic patients A two years observational study.  Diabetes Metab. 2000;  26 197-201 Evidence class III 
  • 128 Kendall DM, Riddle MC, Rosenstock J. et al . Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control over 30 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and a sulfonylurea.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 1083-1091 Evidence class Ib 
  • 129 Kerenyi Z, Samer H, James R. et al . Combination therapy with rosiglitazone and glibenclamide compared with upward titration of glibenclamide alone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Diabet Res Clin Pract. 2004;  63 213-223 Evidence class Ib 
  • 130 Kim SG, Ryu OH, Kim HY. et al . Effect of rosiglitazone on plasma adiponectin levels and arterial stiffness in subjects with prediabetes or non-diabetic metabolic syndrome.  Europ J Endocrin. 2006;  154 433-440 Evidence class Ib 
  • 131 King AB, Armstrong DU. Lipid response to pioglitazone in diabetic patients: clinical observations from a retrospective chart review.  Diabetes Technol Ther. 2002;  4 145-151 Evidence class III 
  • 132 Kipnes MS, Krosnick A, Rendell MS. et al . Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.  Am J Med. 2001;  111 10-17 Evidence class Ib 
  • 133 Klamann A, Sarfert P, Launhardt V. et al . Myocardial infarction in diabetic vs non-diabetic subjects. Survival and infarct size following therapy with sulfonylureas (glibenclamide).  Eur Heart J. 2000;  21 220-229 Evidence class III 
  • 134 Klepzig H, Kober G, Matter C. et al . Sulfonylureas and ischaemic preconditioning: a double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of glimepiride and glibenclamide.  Eur Heart J. 1999;  20 439-446 Evidence class Ib 
  • 135 Koivisto VA, Tuominen JA, Ebeling P. Lispro mix25 insulin as premeal therapy in type 2 diabetic patients.  Diabetes Care. 1999;  22 459-462 Evidence class IIa 
  • 136 Kolterman OG, Kim DD, Shen L. et al . Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes melllitus.  Am Health Syst Pharm. 2005;  62 173-181 Evidence class III 
  • 137 Kolterman OG, Buse JB, Fineman MS. et al . Synthetic exendin-4 (exenatide) significantly reduces postprandial and fasting plasma glucose in subjects with type 2 diabetes.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;  88 3082-3089 Evidence class Ib 
  • 138 Lago RM, Singh PP, Nesto RW. Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes giben thiazolidinediones: a metaanalysis of randomised clinical trials.  Lancet. 2007;  370 1129-1136 Evidence class Ia 
  • 139 Langenfeld MR, Forst T, Hohberg C. et al . Pioglitazone decreases carotid intima-media thickness independently of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Circulation. 2005;  111 2525-2531 Evidence class Ib 
  • 140 Landgraf R. Meglitinide analogues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Drugs and Aging. 2000;  17 411-452 Evidence class IV 
  • 141 Landgraf R, Bilo HJ, Müller PG. A comparison of repaglinide and glibenclamide in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients previously treated with sulphonylureas.  Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;  55 165-171 Evidence class Ib 
  • 142 Laube H, Linn Th, Heyen P. The effect of acarbose on insulin sensitivity and proinsulin in overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1998;  106 231-233 Evidence class IIa 
  • 143 Lawrence JM, Reid J, Taylor GJ. et al . Favorable effects of pioglitazone and metformin compared with gliclazide on lipoprotein subfractions in overweight patients with early type 2 diabetes.  Diab Care. 2004;  27 41-46 Evidence class Ib 
  • 144 Lebovitz H, Kreider M, Freed MI. Evaluation of liver function in type 2 diabetic patients during clinical trials.  Diabet Care. 2002;  25 815-821 Evidence class III 
  • 145 Lebowitz HE. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors as agents in the treatment of diabetes.  Diab Res. 1998;  6 132-145 Evidence class Ia 
  • 146 Lebowitz HE. Insulin secretagogues: old and new.  Diabetes Reviews. 1999;  7 139-153 Evidence class IV 
  • 147 Lee TM, Chou TM. Impairment of myocardial protection in type 2 diabetic patients.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;  88 531-537 Evidence class Ib 
  • 148 Lindsay JR, Duffy NA, McKillop AM. et al . Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity by oral metformin in Type 2 diabetes.  Diabet Med. 2005;  22 654-657
  • 149 Linnebjerg H, Kothare PA, Skrivan ECZ. et al . Exenatide: effect of injection time on postprandial glucose in patients with Type 2 diabetes.  Diabet Med. 2006;  23 240-245 Evidence class Ib 
  • 150 Lotz N, Bachmann W, Ladik T. et al . Combination therapy with insulin/sulfonylurea in the long-term therapy of type II diabetes following “secondary failure”.  Klin Wochenschr. 1988;  66 1079-1084 Evidence class IIa 
  • 151 Mäkimattila S, Nikkila K, Yki-Järvinen H. Causes of weight gain during insulin therapy with and without metformin in patients with typ II diabetes mellitus.  Diabetologia. 1999;  42 406-412 Evidence class Ib 
  • 152 Malmberg K. Prospective randomised study of intensive insulin treatment on long term survival after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction) Study Group.  BMJ. 1997;  314 1512-1515 Evidence class Ib 
  • 153 Malone JK, Woodworth JR, Arora V. et al . Improved postprandial glycemic control with Humalog Mix 75/25 after a standard test meal in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Clin Ther. 2000;  22 222-230 Evidence class Ib 
  • 154 Marbury T, Huang W-C, Strange P. et al . Repaglinide versus glyburide: a one year comparison trial.  Diab Res Clin Pract. 1999;  43 155-166 Evidence class Ib 
  • 155 Mather KJ, Verma S, Anderson TJ. Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;  37 1344-1350 Evidence class IIa 
  • 156 Martin S, Schneider B, Heinemann L. et al . Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes and long-term outcome: an epidemiological cohort study.  Diabetologia. 2006;  49 271-278 Evidence class IIb 
  • 157 Marx N, Froehlich J, Siam L. et al . Antidiabetic PPARgamma-Activator rosiglitazone reduces MMP-9 serum levels in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.  Aterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;  23 283-288 Evidence class IIa 
  • 158 Matthaei S, Stumvoll M, Kellerer M. et al . Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance.  Endocrine Reviews. 2000;  21 585-618 Evidence class IV 
  • 159 Matthaei S, Stumvoll M, Häring HU. Neue AspECte in der Therapie des Diabetes mellitus Typ 2: Thiazolidindione (Insulinsensitizer).  Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2001;  98 A912-A918 Evidence class IV 
  • 160 Matthews DR, Charbonnel BH, Hanefeld M. et al . Long-term therapy with addition of pioglitazone to metformin compared with the addition of gliclazide to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, comparative study.  Diab Metab Res Rev. 2005;  21 167-174 Evidence class Ib 
  • 161 May C. Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von einschleichend dosierter Acarbose bei Patienten mit nicht-insulinpflichtigem Diabetes mellitus (Typ-2 diabetes) unter Sulfonylharnstoffen.  Diab Stoffw. 1995;  4 3-8 Evidence class IIa 
  • 162 Mazzone T, Meyer PM, Feinstein SB. et al . Effect of pioglitazone compared with glimepiride on carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes.  JAMA. 2006;  296 2572-2581 Evidence class Ib 
  • 163 Meneilly GS, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Ryan EA. et al . Effect of acarbose on insulin sensitivity in elderly patients with diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2000;  23 1162-1167 Evidence class Ib 
  • 164 Mentlein R. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (CD26) – role in the inactivation of regulatory peptides.  Regul Pept. 1999;  30 9-24 Evidence class IV 
  • 165 Meyer M, Chudziak F, Schwanstecher C. et al . Structural requirements of sulphonylureas and analogues for interaction with sulphonylurea receptor subtypes.  Br J Pharmacol. 1999;  128 27-34 Evidence class IV 
  • 166 Monami M, Luzzi C, Lamanna C. et al . Three-year mortality in diabetic patients treated with different combinations of insulin secretagogues and metformin.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006;  22 477-482 Evidence class III 
  • 167 Moses R, Slobudniuk R, Boyages S. et al . Effect of repaglinide addition to metformin monotherapy on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 1999;  22 119-124 Evidence class Ib 
  • 168 Moses RG, Gomis R, Brown Frandsen K. et al . Flexible meal-related dosing with repaglinide facilitates glycemic control in therapy-naive type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 11-15 Evidence class Ib 
  • 169 Mullins P, Sharplin P, Yki-Jarvinen H. et al . Negative binomial meta-regression analysis of combined glycosylated hemoglobin and hypoglycemia outcomes across eleven Phase III and IV studies of insulin glargine compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Clin Ther. 2007;  29 1607-1619 Evidence class Ia 
  • 170 Nagasaka S, Aiso Y, Yoshizawa K. et al . Comparison of pioglitazone and metformin efficacy using homoeostasis model assessment.  Diabet Med. 2004;  21 136-141 Evidence class Ib 
  • 171 Nagi D, Yudkin J. Effects of metformin on insulin resistance, risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and plasminogen activator inhibitor in NIDDM subjects: a study of two ethnic groups.  Diabetes Care. 1993;  16 621-629 Evidence class IIa 
  • 172 Natali A, Baldeweg S, Toschi E. et al . Vascular effects of improving metabolic control with metformin or rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes.  Diab Care. 2004;  27 1349-1357 Evidence class Ib 
  • 173 Natali A, Ferrannini E. Effects of metformin and thiazolidinediones on suppression of hepatic glucose production and stimulation of glucose uptake in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.  Diabetologia. 2006;  49 434-441 Evidence class Ib 
  • 174 Nathan DM. Some answers, more controversy, from UKPDS.  Lancet. 1998;  352 832-833 Evidence class IV 
  • 175 Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB. et al . Management of hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 1963-1972 Evidence class IV 
  • 176 Nauck MA, Duran S, Kim D. et al . A comparison of twice-daily exenatide and biphasic insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin: a non-inferiority study.  Diabetologia. 2007a;  50 259-267 Evidence class Ib 
  • 177 Nauck MA, Meininger G, Sheng D. et al Sitagliptin Study 024 Group . Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, compared with the sulfonylurea, glipizide, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007b;  9 194-205 Evidence class Ib 
  • 178 Nelson P, Poon T, Guan X. et al . The incretin mimetic exenatide as a monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Technol Ther. 2007;  9 317-326 Evidence class Ib 
  • 179 Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 2457-2471 Evidence class Ia 
  • 180 Nonaka K, Kakikawa T, Sato A. et al . Twelve-week efficacy and tolerability of sitaglipitin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor, in Japanese patients with T2DM.  Diabetes. 2006;  55 A129 Evidence class Ib 
  • 181 Nonaka K, Kakikawa T, Sato A. et al . Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract.. 2008;  79 291-298 Evidence class Ib 
  • 182 Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E. et al . Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: A randomized prospective 6-year study.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995;  28 103-117 Evidence class Ib 
  • 183 Ong CR, Molyneaux LM, Constantino MI. et al . Long-term efficacy of metformin therapy in nonobese individuals with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 2361-2364 Evidence class III 
  • 184 Övünç K. Effects of glibenclamide, a KATP channel blocker, on warm-up phenomenon in type II diabetic patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.  Clin Cardiol. 2000;  23 535-539 Evidence class III 
  • 185 Olsson J, Lindberg G, Gottsater M. et al . Increased mortality in Type II diabetic patients using sulphonylurea and metformin in combination: A population-based observational study.  Diabetologia. 2000;  43 558-560 Evidence class III 
  • 186 Orbay E, Sargin M, Sargin H. et al . Addition of rosiglitazone to glimepirid and metformin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes.  Endocr J. 2004;  51 521-527 Evidence class IIa 
  • 187 Osei K, O’Dorisio TM, Falko JM. Concomitant insulin and sulfonylurea therapy in patients type II diabetes. Effects on glucoregulation and lipid metabolism.  Amer J Med. 1984;  77 1002-1009 Evidence class IIa 
  • 188 Pan C, Yang W, Barona JP. et al . Comparison of vildagliptin and acarbose monotherapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial.  Diabet Med. 2008;  25 435-441 Evidence class Ib 
  • 189 Panten U, Schwanstecher M, Schwanstecher C. Sulfonylurea receptors and mechanism of sulfonylurea action.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1996;  104 1-9 Evidence class IV 
  • 190 Parulkar AA, Pendergrass ML, Granda-Ayala R. et al . Nonhypoglycemic effects of thiazolidindiones.  Ann Inter Med. 2001;  134 61-71 Evidence class IV 
  • 191 Pavo I, Jermendy G, Varkonyi TT. et al . Effect of pioglitazone compared with metformin on glycemic control and indicators of insulin sensitivity in recently diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;  88 1637-1645 Evidence class Ib 
  • 192 Perriello G, Misericordia P, Volpi E. et al . Acute antihyperglycemic mechanisms of metformin in NIDDM.  Evidence for suppression of lipid oxidation and hepatic glucose production. Diabetes. 1994;  43 920-928 Evidence class IIa 
  • 193 Pfützner A, Schöndorf T, Seidel D. et al . Impact of rosiglitazone on beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and adiponectin concentrations: results from a double-blind oral combination study with glimepiride.  Metab Clin Exp. 2006;  55 20-25 Evidence class Ib 
  • 194 Pfützner A, Forst T. Pioglitazone: An antidiabetic drug with the potency to reduce cardiovascular mortality.  Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006;  7 463-476 Evidence class IV 
  • 195 Pistrosch F, Herbrig K, Kindel B. et al . Rosiglitazone improves glomerular hyperfiltration, renal endothelial dysfunction, and microalbuminuria of incipient diabetic nephropathy in patients.  Diabetes. 2005;  54 2206-2211 Evidence class Ib 
  • 196 Pi-Sunyer FX, Schweizer A, Mills D. et al . Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin monotherapy in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;  76 132-138 Evidence class Ib 
  • 197 Ponssen HH, Elte JW, Lehert P. et al . Combined metformin and insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Clin Ther. 2000;  22 709-713 Evidence class Ib 
  • 198 Pontroli AE, Dino G, Capra F. et al . Combined therapy with glibenclamide and ultralente insulin in lean patients with NIDDM with secondary failure of sulfonyureas Follow up at two years.  Diabete Metab. 1990;  16 323-327 Evidence class III 
  • 199 Poon T, Nelson P, Shen L. et al . Exenatide improves glycemic control and reduces body weight in subjects with type 2 diabetes: A dose-ranging study.  Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005;  7 67-477 Evidence class Ib 
  • 200 Prager R, Schernthaner G. Insulin receptor binding to monocytes, insulin secretion, and glucose tolerance following metformin treatment.  Diabetes. 1983;  32 1083-1086 Evidence class Ib 
  • 201 Prager R, Schernthaner G, Graf H. Effect of metformin on peripheral insulin sensitivity in non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.  Diabete Metab. 1986;  12 346-350 Evidence class IIa 
  • 202 Pratley RE, Jauffret-Kamel S, Galbreath E. et al . Twelve-week monotherapy with the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes.  Horm Metab Res. 2006;  38 423-428 Evidence class Ib 
  • 203 Psaty BM, Furberg CD. Rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  356 2522-2524 Evidence class IV 
  • 204 Quatraro A, Consoli G, Ceriello A. et al . Combined insulin and sulfonylurea therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetics with secondary failure to oral drugs: a one year follow-up.  Diabete Metab. 1986;  12 315-318 Evidence class IIb 
  • 205 Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Salini J. et al . Use of glimepiride and insulin sensitizers in the treatment of type 2 diabetes – a study in Indians.  J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;  52 459-463 Evidence class Ib 
  • 206 Raskin P, Rendell M, Ridde MC. et al . A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 1226-1232 Evidence class Ib 
  • 207 Raskin P, McGill J, Saad MF. et al . Combination therapy for type 2 diabetes: Repaglinide plus rosiglitazone.  Diab Med. 2004;  21 329-335 Evidence class Ib 
  • 208 Raslova K, Bogoev M, Raz I. et al . Insulin detemir and insulin aspart: A promising basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;  66 193-201 Evidence class Ib 
  • 209 Ratner RE, Maggs D, Nielsen LL. et al . Long-term effects of exenatide therapy over 82 weeks on glycaemic control and weight in over-weight metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;  8 419-428 Evidence class IIb 
  • 210 Rave K, Klein O, Frick AD. Advantage of premeal-injected insulin glulisine compared with regular human insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 1812-1817 Evidence class Ib 
  • 211 Raz I, Hanefeld M, Xu L. et al Sitagliptin Study 023 Group . Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Diabetologia. 2006;  49 2564-2571 Evidence class Ib 
  • 212 Raz I, Chen Y, Wu M. et al . Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;  24 537-550 Evidence class Ib 
  • 213 Riddle M, Hart J, Bingham P. et al . Combined therapy for obese type 2 diabetes: suppertime mixed insulin with daytime sulfonylurea.  Am J Med Sci. 1992;  303 151-156 Evidence class IIb 
  • 214 Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. et al Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators . The treat-to-target trial: trandomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.  Diabetes Care. 2003;  26 3080-3086 Evidence class Ib 
  • 215 Ristic S, Byiers S, Foley J. et al . Improved glycaemic control with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes: Vildagliptin (LAF237) dose response.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2005;  7 692-698 Evidence class Ib 
  • 216 Ristic S, Bates BC. Vildagliptin: A novel DPP-4 inhibitor with pancreatic islet enhancement activity for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.  Drugs Today (Barc). 2006;  42 519-531 Evidence class Ia 
  • 217 Roach P, Trautmann M, Anderson J. Lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia with a novel protamine based formulation of insulin lispro.  Diabetes. 1998;  47 A92
  • 218 Rosenfalck AM, Thorsby P, Kjems L. et al . Improved postprandial glycaemic control with insulin Aspart in type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin.  Acta Diabetol. 2000;  37 41-46 Evidence class Ib 
  • 219 Rosenstock J, Brown A, Fischer J. et al . Efficacy and safety of acarbose in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 1998;  21 2050-2055 Evidence class Ib 
  • 220 Rosenstock J, Schwartz SL, Clarc Jr CM. et al . Basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: 28-week comparison of insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH insulin.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 631-636 Evidence class IIa 
  • 221 Rosenstock J, Einhorn D, Hershon K. et al . Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes: A randomised, placebo-controlled study in patients receiving stable insulin therapy.  Int J Clin Pract. 2002;  56 51-257 Evidence class Ib 
  • 222 Rosenstock J, Hassman DR, Madder RD. et al Repaglinide Versus Nateglinide Comparison Study Group . Repaglinide versus nateglinide monotherapy: A randomized, multicenter study.  Diabetes Care. 2004;  27 1265-1270 Evidence class Ib. 
  • 223 Rosenstock J, Dailey G, Massi-Benedetti M. et al . Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine: A meta-analysis comparing insulin glargine with human NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 950-955 Evidence class Ia 
  • 224 Rosenstock J, Goldstein BJ, Vinik AI. et al . Effect of early addition of rosiglitazone to sulphonylurea therapy in older type 2 diabetes patients (> 60 years): the Rosiglitazone Early vs.  SULphonylurea Titration (RESULT) study. Diab Obes Metab. 2005;  7 1-9 Evidence class Ib. 
  • 225 Rosenstock J, Sugimoto D, Strange P. et al . Triple therapy in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2006;  29 554-559 Evidence class Ib 
  • 226 Rosenstock J, Brazg R, Andryuk PJ. et al Sitagliptin Study 019 Group . Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin added to ongoing pioglitazone therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.  Clin Ther. 2006;  28 1556-1568 Evidence class Ib 
  • 227 Rosenstock J, Baron MA, Dejager S. et al . Comparison of vildagliptin and rosiglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial.  Diabetes Care. 2007a;  30 217-223 Evidence class Ib 
  • 228 Rosenstock J, Baron MA, Camisasca RP. et al . Efficacy and tolerability of initial combination therapy with vildagliptin and pioglitazone compared with component monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007b;  9 175-185 Evidence class Ib 
  • 229 Rosenstock J, Davies M, Home PD. et al . A randomised, 52-week, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine when administered as add-on to glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetologia. 2008;  51 408-416 Evidence class Ib 
  • 230 Rosenstock R, Fonseca V, McGill J. et al . Similar Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy with Glargine or NPH Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes.  Diabetes. 2008;  57 ((Suppl 1)) A86 301 OR. Evidence class Ib 
  • 231 Saenz A, Fernandez-Esteban I, Mataix A. et al . Metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev.. 2005;  20 CD002966 Review. Evidence class Ia 
  • 232 Salpeter S, Greyber E, Pasternak G. et al . Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  25 CD002967 Evidence class Ia 
  • 233 Sarol JN, Nicodemus NA, Tan KM. et al . Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of a multicomponent therapy among non-insulin requiring type 2 diabetes patients: Ameta-analysis (1966-2004).  Curr Med Res Pin. 2005;  21 173-184 Evidence class Ia 
  • 234 Schatz H, Massi-Benedetti M. Pioglitazone: From Discovery to Clinical Practice.  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2000;  108 ((Suppl 2)) 221-274 Evidence class IV 
  • 235 Schernthaner G, Matthews DR, Charvonnel B. et al . Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone versus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A double-blind, randomized trial.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;  89 6068-6076 Evidence class Ib 
  • 236 Schernthaner G. Is dyslipidaemia important if we control glycaemia?.  Atherosclerosis Supplementum. 6;  2005 3-10 Evidence class IV 
  • 237 Schernthaner G, Schernthaner GH. Metformin – from Devil to Angel. In: Pharmacotherapy of Diabetes Mellitus Ed. Mogensen CEM, Spinger New York 2007 (in press). Evidence class IV
  • 238 Schneider J. An overview of the safety and tolerance of glimepiride.  Horm Metab Res. 1996;  28 413-418 Evidence class IV 
  • 239 Schwartz S, Raskin P, Fonseca V. et al . Effect of troglitazone in insulin-treated patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Troglitazone and exogenous insulin study group.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  338 861-866 Evidence class Ib 
  • 240 Schweizer A, Couturier A, Foley JE. et al . Comparison between vildagliptin and metformin to sustain reductions in HbA1c over 1 year in drug-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes.  Diabet Med. 2007;  24 955-961 Evidence class Ib 
  • 241 Scott R, Wu M, Sanchez M. et al . Efficacy and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin as monotherapy over 12 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Int J Clin Pract. 2007;  61 171-180 Evidence class Ib 
  • 242 Seigler DF, Olsson GM, Skyler JS. Morning versus bedtime isophane insulin in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus.  Diabet Med. 1992;  9 826-833 Evidence class IIa 
  • 243 Shichiri M, Kishikawa H, Ohkubo Y. et al . Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients.  Diabetes Care. 2000;  23 ((Suppl 2)) B21-B29 Evidence class Ib 
  • 244 Simpson SH, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT. et al . Dose-response relation between sulfonylurea drugs and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population-based cohort study.  CMAJ.. 2000;  174 169-174 Evidence class III 
  • 245 Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: A metaanalysis.  JAMA. 2007;  298 1189-1195 Evidence class Ia 
  • 246 Smith SA. et al . Rosiglitazone, but not glyburide, reduces circulating proinsulin and the proinsulin: Insulin ration in type 2 diabetes.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;  89 6048-6053 Evidence class Ib. 
  • 247 Stenman S, Groop PH, Saloranta C. et al . Effects of the combination of insulin and glibencamide in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with secondary failure to oral hypoglycaemic agents.  Diabetologia. 1988;  31 206-213 Evidence class IIa 
  • 248 Stettler C, Allemann S, Jüni P. et al . Glycemic control and macrovascular disease in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.  Am Heart J. 2006;  152 27-38 Evidence class Ia. 
  • 249 Stocker DJ, Taylor AJ, Langley RW. et al . A randomized trial of the effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on inflammation and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Am Heart J. 2007;  153 445 e1-6 Evidence class Ib 
  • 250 St John-Sutton M, Rendell M, Dandona P. et al . A comparison of the effects of rosiglitazone and glyburide on cardiovascular function and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2002;  25 2058-2064 Evidence class Ib 
  • 251 Tan M, Johns D, Gonzalez Galvez G. et al . Effects of pioglitazone and glimepiride on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial.  Clin Ther. 2004;  26 680-693 Evidence class Ib 
  • 252 Tan MH, Johns D, Strand J. et al . Sustained effects of pioglitazone vs glibenclamide on insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control, and lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabet Med. 2004;  21 859-866 Evidence class Ib 
  • 253 Tan MH, Baksi A, Krahulec B. et al . Comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in sustaining glycemic control over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diab Care. 2005;  28 544-550 Evidence class Ib 
  • 254 Tanaka Y, Uchino H, Shimuzu T. et al . Effect of metformin on advanced glycation endproduct formation and peripheral nerve function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.  Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;  376 17-22
  • 255 The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group . Effect of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes.  N Eng J Med. 2008;  358 2545-2559 Evidence class Ib 
  • 256 The ADVANCE Collaborative Group . Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.  N Eng J Med. 2008;  358 2560-2572 Evidence class 1b 
  • 257 The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effects of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 977-986 Evidence class Ib 
  • 258 Tiikainen M, Häkkinen AM, Korsheninnikova E. et al . Effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on liver fat content, hepatic insulin resistance, insulin clearance, and gene expression in adipose tissue in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes. 2004;  53 2169-2176 Evidence class Ib 
  • 259 Tschritter O, Fritsche A, Gallwitz B. et al . Langwirkende Insulinanaloga in der Therapie des Diabetes mellitus.  Typ 1 und Typ 2 Diabetes und Stoffwechsel. 2005;  6 375-382 Evidence class Ia 
  • 260 UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type-2 diabetes. (UKPDS 33).  Lancet. 1998;  352 837-853 Evidence class Ib 
  • 261 UKPDS Group . Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34).  Lancet. 1998;  352 854-865 Evidence class Ib 
  • 262 Umpierrez G, Issa M, Vlajnic A. Glimepiride versus pioglitazone combination therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: results of a randomized clinical trial.  Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;  22 751-759 Evidence class Ib 
  • 263 Vague PH, Juhan-Vague I, Alessi MC. et al . Metformin decreases the high plasminogen activator inhibition capacity, plasma insulin, and triglyceride levels in non-diabetic obese subjects.  Thromb Haemost. 1987;  57 326-328 Evidence class IIa 
  • 264 Van Wijk JPH, de Koning EJP, Castro Carbezas M. et al . Rosiglitazone improves postprandial triglyzeride and free fatty acid metabolism in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 844-849 Evidence class Ib 
  • 265 Viswanathan P, Chaudhuri A, Bhatia R. et al . Exenatide therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin.  Endocr Pract. 2007;  13 444-450 Evidence class IIb 
  • 266 Wagstaff AJ, Goa KL. Rosiglitazone – a review of its use in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Drugs. 2002;  62 1805-1837 Evidence class IV 
  • 267 Wan Mohamad WB, Tun Fizi A, Ismail RB. et al . Efficacy and safety of single versus multiple daily doses of glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;  49 93-99 Evidence class III 
  • 268 Watanabe I, Tani S, Anazawa T. et al . Effect of pioglitazone on arterosclerosis in comparison with that of glibenclamide.  Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;  68 104-110 Evidence class Ib 
  • 269 Welschen LM, Bloemendal E, Nijpels G. et al . Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin: A Systematic review.  Diabetes Care. 2005;  28 1510-1517 Evidence class Ia 
  • 270 Widen E, Erikson J, Groop L. Metformin normalizes nonoxidative glucose metabolism in insulin-resistant normoglycemic first degree relatives of patients with NIDDM.  Diabetes. 1992;  41 354-358 Evidence class IIa 
  • 271 Willms B, Ruge D. Comparison of acarbose and metformin in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled with diet and sulfonylureas: A randomized, placebo-controlled study.  Diabetic Medicine. 1999;  16 755-761 Evidence class Ib 
  • 272 Wolfenbuttel BH, Sels JP, Huijberts MS. Rosiglitazone.  Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2001;  2 467-478 Evidence class IV 
  • 273 Wright A, Burden ACF, Paisey RB. et al . Sulfonylurea inadequacy Efficacy of addition of insulin over 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 57).  Diabetes Care. 2002;  25 330-336 Evidence class Ib 
  • 274 Yang WS, Jeng CY, Wu TJ. et al . Synthetic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonist, rosiglitazone, increases plasma levels of adiponectin in type 2 diabetic patients.  Diab Care. 2002;  25 376-380 Evidence class Ib 
  • 275 Yanagawa T, Araki A, Sasamoto K. et al . Effect of antidiabetic medications on microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Metabolism. 2004;  53 353-357 Evidence class Ib 
  • 276 Yki-Järvinen H, Kauppila M, Kujansuu E. et al . Comparison of insulin regimens in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.  N Engl J Med. 1992;  327 1426-1433 Evidence class Ib 
  • 277 Yki-Järvinen H, Rysy L, Nikkiä K. et al . Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;  130 389-396 Evidence class Ib 
  • 278 Yki-Järvinen H, Dressler A, Ziemen M. et al HOE 901/3002 Study Group . Less nocturnal hypoglycemia and better post-dinner glucose control with bedtime insulin glargine compared with bedtime NPH insulin during insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. HOE 901/3002 Study Group.  Diabetes Care. 2000;  23 1130-1136 Evidence class Ib 
  • 279 Yki-Järvinen H. Combination therapies with insulin in type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 758-767 Evidence class IV 
  • 280 Yki-Järvinen H, Kauppinen-Mäkelin R, Tiikkainen M. et al . Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: The LANMET study.  Diabetologia. 2006;  49 442-451 Evidence class Ib 
  • 281 Yki-Järvinen H. Thiazolidinediones.  N Engl J Med. 2004;  351 1106-1118 Evidence class IV 
  • 282 Yki-Järvinen H, Juurinen L, Alvarsson M. et al . Initiate Insulin by Aggressive Titration and Education (INITIATE): A randomized study to compare initiation of insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetic patients individually and in groups.  Diabetes Care. 2007;  30 1364-1369 Evidence class IV 
  • 283 Yosefy C, Magen E, Kiselevich A. et al . Rosiglitazone improves, while glibenclamide worsens blood pressure control in treated hypertensive diabetic and dyslipidemic subjects via modulation of insulin resistance and sympathetic activity.  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004;  44 215-222 Evidence class Ib 
  • 284 Zhu XX, Pan CY, Li GW. et al . Addition of rosiglitazone to existing sulfonylurea treatment in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and exposure to hepatitis B or C.  Diab Tech Ther. 2003;  5 33-42 Evidence class Ib. 
  • 285 Zinman B, Hoogwerf BJ, Duran Garcia S. et al . The effect of adding exenatide to a thiazolidinedione in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial.  Ann Intern Med. 2007;  146 477-485 Evidence class Ib 

1 Note: This updated version takes into account all evidence that was published prior to the end of 06/2008, as well as all new approvals/indications prior to the same date.

Appendix 1

Statement by the DDG regarding the results of the ACCORD and ADVANCE studies

4.1 Introduction

The effect of near normoglycaemic metabolic control on the reduction of microvascular complications (e. g. nephropathy, retinopathy) in patients with type 2 diabetes is well documented [286, 287].

On the other hand, the number of studies on the effect of near normoglycaemic metabolic control on macrovascular complications (e. g. myocardial infarction, stroke) is comparatively less extensive and is essentially based on the results of the UKPDS, which after 10 years revealed a clear downward trend in myocardial infarctions, which however did not quite reach the level of significance (p=0.052 [286]). On the other hand a non-significant rise in strokes, by 11% in relative terms, was observed in the intensified arm of blood glucose reduction. The 10-year follow-up review of the results of the UKPDS are will be presented at this year's EASD Congress.

In this context, the results of two large studies that examined the effect of close to normal glucose metabolism control on macrovascular (ACCORD) and macro- and microvascular (ADVANCE) complications were presented at this year's Congress of the American Diabetes Association (6.-10.6.). Both studies were published in the New England Journal of Medicine to coincide with the presentation [288, 289].

4.2 Design and results of the ACCORD study

The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study examined the effect of intensifying control of blood glucose, blood pressure and lipids on macrovascular complications compared with standard therapy. The results of the blood pressure and lipid therapy are expected to be published in 2010. The increased rate of mortality in the group receiving intensified antihyperglycaemic therapy caused this therapy arm of the study to be discontinued prematurely in February 2008, after 3.5 years, and the results thereof were published in June 2008 [288].

A total of 10,251 patients were recruited at 77 centres in the USA and Canada. In the group receiving intensified treatment the HbA1c target value was <6.0%, in the group receiving standard therapy the target HbA1c value was in a range from 7.0–7.9%.

All approved substances with antihyperglycaemic effects (OADs, exenatde, insulin) could be used to achieve these targets, even combination therapies were unrestricted, in terms of either the number or type of substances used.

Definition of the primary endpoint:

  • Non-fatal myocardial infarction,

  • Non-fatal stroke,

  • Death from cardiovascular causes.

4.2.1 Results of the ACCORD study ([Table 1])

Parameter

Intensified (n=5 128) (at end of study)

Standard (n=5 123) (at end of study)

Relative riskreduction (%)

p-value

HbA1c (%)

6.4

7.5

<0.001

Antihyperglycaemic therapy used

combination therapies for patients w/o insulin (no. of substance groups*)

1 or 2 (n pat. (%))

2798 (54.6)

3224 (62.9)

3 (n pat.(%))

3030 (59.1)

1681 (32.8)

4 or 5 (n pat.(%))

539 (10.5)

109 (2.1)

combination therapies for patients with insulin (no. of substance groups *)

0 (n pat.(%))

916 (17.9)

892 (17.4

1 or 2 (n pat. (%))

3311 (64.6)

2375 (46.4)

3 (n pat.(%))

2668 (52.0)

834 (16.3)

4 or 5 (n pat.(%))

526 (10.3)

64 (1.2)

Side effects (selection)

severe hypoglycaemia requiring external assistance (n pat.(%))

830 (16.2)

261 (5.1)

< 0.001

severe hypoglycaemia requiring assistance from medical staff (n pat.(%))

538 (10.5)

179 (3.5)

< 0.001

Parameter

intensified (n=5,128) (at end of study)

standard (n=5,123) (at end of study)

relative riskreduction (%)

p-value

weight gain (kg)

3.5

0.4

<0.001

weight gain >10 kg (n pat.(%))

1399 (27.8)

713 (14.1)

< 0.001

Primary and secondary endpoints

primary endpoint (n pat. (%))

352 (6.9)

371 (7.2)

10

0.16

all-cause mortality (n pat. (%))

257 (5.0)

203 (4.0)

−22

0.04

cardiovascular death (n pat. (%))

135 (2.6)

94 (1.8)

−35

0.02

non-fatal myocardial infarction (n pat. (%))

186 (1.1)

235 (4.6)

24

0.004

non-fatal stroke (n pat. (%))

67 (1.3)

61 (1.2)

−6

0.74

heart failure (fatal / non-fatal) (n pat. (%))

152 (3.0)

124 (2.4)

−18

0.17

* the following substance groups were defined:

Metformin

Secretogogues (sulphonylureas, glinides)

Thiazolidindione (preferably rosiglitazone)

Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors

Incretins (exenatide, sitagliptin)

4.2.2 Summary

The primary endpoint was reduced non-significantly by 10% in relative terms (p=0.16). The main reason for this trend was a significant relative reduction of 24% (p=0.004) in the risk of non-fatall myocardial infarctions.

The cause(s) of the significantly increased mortality (relative increase 22%, p=0.04) is (are) currently unknown and must be investigated in subsequent analyses. It is still unclear whether

  • undetected hypoglycaemia (increased sympathotonus >> arrythmias >>death) against the background of hyperglycaemias requiring external assistance experienced by 16.2% of patients (3.1 times greater than standard therapy),

  • the marked weight gain in a large subgroup of the patients (27.8% gained > 10 kg over the course of the study; > 70% of the patients in the group receiving intensified treatment received insulin + thiazolidindione combination therapy),

  • interferences within the polypharmacotherapy used (at the end of the study ∼70% of the patients who were not treated with insulin and ∼60% of those who were treated with insulin were receiving combination therapy consisting of 3, 4, or 5 OADs,

  • or the speed with which the HbA1c target value was achieved

  • might have been a factor in this respect.

4.3 Design and results of the ADVANCE study

The Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: Preterax and Diamicron-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study examined the effect of intensifying control of blood sugar and blood pressure on macrovascular and microvascular complications in comparison with a standard therapy. The results of the intensified blood pressure therapy were published in 2007 [290]. In all, 11,140 patients were recruited at 215 centres in 20 countries (particularly in Australia, Asia, Europe, Canada).

The HbA1c target value in the group receiving intensified treatment was <6.5%, the target value for the standard treatment group was 7.5%. In order to achieve these targets, the following procedure was established for the intensified treatment group:

  • Intensification of non-pharmacological therapy options

  • Escalation of therapy by attending physision on the basis of HbA1c and fasting blood sugar levels, taking into account the following recommendations:

  • Escalation of the gliclazid-MR dose

  • Supplementing with other OADs

  • Supplementing with a long-acting insulin

  • Intensified insulin therapy (multiple insulin injection therapy)

Definition of the primary endpoint:

  • Non-fatal myocardial infarction

  • Non-fatal stroke

  • Death from cardiovascular causes

  • Nephropathy

  • Retinopathy

4.3.1 Results of the ADVANCE study ([Table 2])

Parameter

Intensified (n=4 828) (at end of study)

Standard (n=4 741) (at end of study)

Relative risk reduction (%)

p-value

HbA1c (%)

6.5

7.3

<0.001

Antihyperglycaemic therapy used

gliclazid (n pat. (%))

4209 (90.5)

80 (1.6)

other SU (n pat. (%))

89 (1.9)

2606 (57.1)

metformin (n pat.(%))

3455 (73.8)

3057 (67.0)

thiazolidindione (n pat.(%))

788 (16.8)

495 (10.9)

acarbose (n pat. (%))

891 (19.1)

576 (12.6)

glinide (n pat. (%))

58 (1.2)

127 (2.8)

insulin (n pat.(%))

1953 (40.5)

1142 (24.1)

Side effects (selection)

severe hypoglycaemia (%/year)

0.7

0.4

<0.05

weight gain (kg)

0.0

−1.0

<0.05

Primary and secondary endpoints

primary endpoint (n pat. (%))

1009 (18.1)

1116 (20.0)

10

0.01

all-cause mortality (n pat. (%))

498 (8.9)

533 (9.6)

7

0.28

cardiovascular death (n pat. (%))

253 (4.5)

289 (5.2)

12

>0.05

non-fatal myocardial infarction (n pat. (%))

153 (2.7)

156 (2.8)

2

>0.05

non-fatal stroke (n pat. (%))

214 (3.8)

209 (3.8)

−2

>0.05

heart failure (n pat. (%))

220 (3.9)

231 (4.1)

5

>0.05

nephropathy (recurrence or progression) (n pat (%))

230 (4.1)

292 (5.2)

21

0.006

retinopathy (recurrence or progression) (n pat. (%))

332 (6.0)

349 (6.3)

5

>0.05

4.3.2 Summary

The primary endpoint was lowered by 10% in relative terms (p=0.01).

The main reason for this effect was a significant reduction in nephropathy, by 21% in relative terms (p=0.006).

Overall mortality was lowered non-significantly, by 7% in relative terms (p=0.28). Macrovascular events were lowered non-significantly, by 6% in relative terms (p=0.32).

The number of severe hypoglycaemia in the group receiving intensified therapy was 0.7%/year, higher than in the group receiving standard therapy (0.4%/year).

The group receiving intensified therapy experienced no weight gain, the group receiving standard therapy experienced an average weight loss of 1.0 kg.

4.4 Comparative consideration of ACCORD and ADVANCE

Study characteristics

ACCORD

ADVANCE

Patient characteristics at start of study

number of study participants

10,251

11,140

age (in years)

62

66

duration of diabetes (in years)

10

8

HbA1c (average) (%)

8.3

7.3

percentage with prior macrovascular diseases (%)

35

32

Intervention data

Definition of primary endpoint

non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, death due to cardiovascular causes

non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, death due to cardiovascular causes, nephropathy, retinopathy

HbA1c target value (%)

<6.0

≤6.5

Average duration of study (in years)

3.4

5.0

Pharmacotherapy at end of study (intensified vs. standard) (%)

insulin

77 vs. 55

41 vs. 24

metformin

95 vs. 87

74 vs. 67

secretagogues (sulphonylurea / glinide)

87 vs. 74

94 vs. 62

thiazolidinedione

92 vs. 58

17 vs. 11

incretin based therapies (exenatide, sitagliptin)

18 vs. 5

Not reported

statin

88 vs. 88

46 vs. 48

any antihypertensive medication

91 vs. 92

89 vs. 88

ACE inhibitors

70 vs. 72

Not reported

aspirin

76 vs. 76

57 vs. 55

Results (intensified vs. standard)

HbA1c (average at end of study (%))

6.4 vs. 7.5 +

6.5 vs. 7.3 +

mortality

all-cause

5.0 vs. 4.0 +

(%) 8.9 vs. 9.6

cardiovascular (%)

2.6 vs. 1.8 +

4.5 vs. 5.2

non-fatal myocardial infarction (%)

3.6 vs. 4.6 +

2.7 vs. 2.8

non-fatal stroke (%)

1.3 vs. 1.2

3.8 vs. 3.8

severe hypoglycaemia requiring external assistance (ACCORD), or severe hypoglycaemia (ADVANCE) (%/year)

3.1 vs. 1.0 +

0.7 vs. 0.4

weight gain (kg)

3.5 vs. 0.4

0.0 vs. – 1.0 +

nicotine abuse (%)

10 vs. 10

8 vs. 8

+ The comparison of the intervention with the standard therapy was significant. Modified according to (6)

[Table 3] shows a comparison summary of the essential parameters of the two studies.

4.4.1 Note on patient characteristics

The patient characteristics show that the patient cohorts recruited in both studies displayed similarities in terms of age, duration of diabetes and percentage with pre-existing macrovascular diseases. The HbA1c target values achieved were comparable.

4.4.2 Note on intensifying antihyperglycaemic therapy

The ways in which antihyperglycaemic therapy was intensified present marked differences: Whereas a polypharmacotherapeutic approach was adopted in the ACCORD study (by the end of the study ∼70% of patients not treated with insulin and ∼60% of those treated with insulin were receiving combination therapies with 3, 4, or 5 OADs), the ADVANCE study used an algorithm to determine a supplementary regimen of insulin with lasting effects if the HbA1c target value of <6.5% was not achieved using OADs alone. If a further escalation in therapy became necessary in order to achieve the HbA1c target value, intensified insulin therapy using basal and prandial insulin was recommended.

4.4.3 Note on results regarding effect on mortality

The conspicuous effect of increased mortality in the group receiving intensified treatment in the ACCORD study was not observed in the ADVANCE study, which recorded comparable results for HbA1c target value achievement.

4.4.4 Note on side effects of intensified therapy

4.4.4.1 Hypoglycaemia

The group receiving intensified treatment in the ACCORD study experienced severe hypoglycaemia at a rate 3.1 times greater than the standard treatment group, overall 16.2% of the patients in this group suffered a severe hypoglycaemia episode

In the ADVANCE study, the rate of severe hypogylycaemia was 0.7%/year, slightly higher than in the standard therapy group (0.4%/year), but lower than in the standard therapy group of the ACCORD study (1.0%/year) – with a difference of 1.0% (6.5% (ADVANCE (int.) vs. 7.5% (ACCORD (std.))) in the average HbA1c value.

4.4.4.2 Weight gain

The average weight gain of patients in the ACCORD study was 3.5 kg, 27.8% of the patients experienced a weight gain of > 10 kg.

The patients in the group receiving intensified treatment in the ADVANCE study experienced no weight gain (+/- 0.0 kg).

4.5 Conclusions

The results of the ADVANCE study show that intensified antihyperglycaemiec therapy that aims to achieve an HbA1c target value of <6.5% while avoiding side effects (hypoglycaemia, weight gain) is associated with significantly reduced recurrence or progression of nephropathy, by 21% in relative terms (NNT 91 for 5 years). Macrovascular endpoints were not significantly reduced by the end of the 5-year study.

The results of the ACCORD study show that lowering the HbA1c to below 6.5% – under the conditions of this study – can increase mortality due to myocardial infarction. The differing results from these two studies indicate that the way in which antihyperglycaemic therapy is intensified is of crucial importance to the success of the therapy.

The conclusion derived from the studies for application in practical therapy is that lowering HbA1c to 6.5% as compared with a target value of 7.0% can be beneficial for the patient, but should only be aimed for provided that

  • hypoglycaemia (particularly severe hypoglycaemia) can be largely prevented,

  • the therapeutic effect is not associated with significant weight gain,

  • inadequately documented combinations of multiple oral diabetics (i. e., generally more than two) are avoided, and particularly that such multiple combinations are discontinued if treatment with insulin is begun.

The polypharmacotherapeutic procedure adopted in the ACCORD study (with the side effects described above) is not recommended in the territory for which the DDG guideline is authoritative. Instead, the guideline recommends a procedure with preferential use of a non-hypoglycaemia inducing substance (metformin) as the medium of first choice [292] and also the use of insulin, if the HbA1c target value is no longer reached with a combination therapy consisting of no more than two OADs.

In the light of the results of the ACCORD and ADVANCE studies, the DDG guideline on “Antihyperglycaemic treatment of type 2 diabetes” has been supplemented with a statement to the effect that avoidance of side effects (hypoglycaemia, significant weight gain) is a primary objective, even at the cost of allowing the HbA1c target value to remain at 7.0, if a target value of <6.5% can only be achieved with the side effects described above.

The guidelines commission will respond promptly to the publications on this subject that are expected soon (e. g. further analyses of the ACCORD study, VADT, results of the 10-year follow-up review of the UKPDS (presentation on 10.9.08 on the EASD, BARI-2D etc.), and will adapt its recommendations for treating type 2 diabetes to the latest status of published evidence as necessary, in keeping with the guidelines of the the EASD and IDF.

DDG President

DDG Managing Board

DDG Pharmacotherapy Committee

DDG Guidelines Commission

(Antihyperglycaemic treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus)

4.6 References

1 UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type-2 diabetes. (UKPDS 33) . Lancet 1998 ; 352 : 837 – 853

2 Shichiri M , Kishikawa H , Ohkubo Y et al . Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients . Diabees Care 2000 ; 23 (Suppl.2) : B21 – B29

3 The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group . Effect of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes . N Eng J Med 2008 ; 358 : 2545 – 2559

4 The ADVANCE Collaborative Group . Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes . N Eng J Med 2008 ; 358 : 2560 – 2572

5 Patel A , McMahon S, The ADVANCE Collaborative Group . Effect of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus . Lancet 2007 ; 370 : 829 – 840

6 Dluhy RG , McMahon GT . Intensive Glycemic Control in the ACCORD and ADVANCE Trials. N Eng J Med 2008 ; 358 : 2630 – 2633

7 UKPDS Group . Eff ect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998 ; 352 : 854 – 865

Correspondence

Prof. Stephan Matthaei

Spokesperson for the Panel of Experts

Quakenbrück Diabetes Centre, DDG clinical diabetes centre

Department of Diabetology, Metabolism and Endocrinology at the Christliches Krankenhaus Academic Teaching Hospital of the Hannover Medical University

Danziger Straße10

49610 Quakenbrück

Phone: ++49/5431/15 2830

Fax: ++49/5431/15 2831

Email: S.Matthaei@ckq-gmbh.de

Prof. W. A. Scherbaum

Chairman of the DDG

Guidelines Committee

Clinic for Endocrinology, Diabetology and Rheumatology at Düsseldorf University

Hospital WHO Collaborating

Centre for Diabetes European

Training Centre in Endocrinology and Metabolism

Moorenstraße 05

40225 Düsseldorf

Phone: ++49/ 211/81 17810

Fax: ++49/211/81 17860

Email: scherbaum@uni-duesseldorf.de

    >