Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2010; 14(3): 98-105
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245512
Fallbeispiel

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Stabilisationstraining mit Patienten im Kaltenborn-Evjenth-Konzept

Exercise with Patients according to the Kaltenborn-Evjenth ConceptF. Zahnd1
  • 1 provital Physiotherapie, CH-8132 Egg
Further Information

Publication History

Manuskript eingetroffen: 27.4.2010

Manuskript akzeptiert: 28.4.2010

Publication Date:
29 July 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Das vorliegende Fallbeispiel beschreibt die erfolgreiche Behandlung nach dem Kaltenborn-Evjenth-Konzept bei einer Patientin mit Verlust der Kontrolle der segmentalen und globalen Muskulatur sowie gleichzeitiger segmentaler Hypermobilität.

Abstract

This case study describes the successful treatment according to Kaltenborn-Evjenth concept in a patient with loss of segmental as well as global muscular control combined with concomitant segmental hypermobility.

Schlüsselwörter

muskulärer Kontrollverlust - segmentale Hypermobilität - Kaltenborn-Evjenth-Konzept

Key words

loss of muscular control - segmental hypermobility - Kaltenborn Evjenth concept

Literatur

  • 1 American College of Sports Medicine .ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Brady M, Gunnari H, Evjenth O. Sekvenstrening med og uten utstyr.  Alfta: Areyers,. 1983; 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Butler D, Moseley L G. Explain Pain. Adelaide: Noigroup; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Butler D, Moseley L G. Schmerzen verstehen. Berlin: Springer; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Hamilton C, Schillinger A. Leserbrief zu: Boettcher N et al. Lässt sich die Aktivität des M. transversus abdominis selektiv messen? Der M. transversus abdominis im Blickwinkel – Wissenschaftlicher Kommentar.  Manuelle Therapie. 2008;  12 101-102
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Hides J A, Richardson C A, Jull G A. Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute first episode low back pain.  Spine. 1996;  21 2763-2769
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Luomajoki H, Kool J, Bruin de E et al. Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2007;  8 90
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Moseley G L. Joining Forces – Combining Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training with Group or Individual Pain Physiology Education: A Successful Treatment for Low Back Pain.  The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy. 2003;  11 88-94
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Moseley G L. Reconceptualising Pain according to Modern Pain Science.  Physical Therapy Reviews. 2007;  12 169-178
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Pandjabi M. The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part 1: Function, Dysfunction, Adaptation and Inhancement.  Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1992;  5 383-389
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Pandjabi M. The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part 2: Neutral Zone and Stability Hypothesis.  Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1992;  5 390-396
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Richardson C, Hodges P W, Hides J. Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbopelvic Stabilisation – A Motor Control Approach of the Treatment and Prevention of Low Back Pain. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone; 2004
    Google Scholar

Fritz Zahnd

Im Ahorn 13

8702 Zollikerberg

Schweiz

Email: fzahnd@bluewin.ch

      >