Using DNA Barcoding to Identify Species within Euphorbiaceae

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In this study, we tested the applicability of four DNA regions (rbcL, matK, ITS, and ITS2) as barcodes for identifying species within Euphorbiaceae. Based on assessments of the specific genetic divergence, the DNA barcoding gap, and the ability for species discrimination, the present results affirmed that ITS/ITS2 is a potential barcode for the Euphorbiaceae species. This study also provided a large-scale test to evaluate the effectiveness of ITS/ITS2 for differentiating species within Euphorbiaceae. Of the 1183 plant samples collected from 871 species in 66 diverse genera, ITS/ITS2 successfully identified > 90 % and 100 % of them at the species and genus levels, respectively. Therefore, our research indicates that use of the ITS/ITS2 region is a powerful technique for Euphorbiaceae identification.

References

• 1 Heinrich M. The identification of medicinal plants.  J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;  111 440
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Hebert P D N, Cywinska A, Ball S L, de Waard J R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.  Proc Biol Sci. 2003;  270 313-321
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Moritz C, Cicero C. DNA barcoding: promises and pitfalls.  PLoS Biol. 2004;  2 1529-1534
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hebert P D N, Gregory T R. The promise barcoding for taxonomy.  Syst Biol. 2005;  54 852-859
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Evans K M, Wortley A H, Mann D G. An assessment of potential diatom “barcode” genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta).  Protist. 2007;  158 349-364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G. DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;  105 2923-2928
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 CBOL Plant Working Group . A DNA barcode for land plants.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;  106 12794-12797
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Chen S L, Yao H, Han J P, Liu C, Song J Y, Shi L C, Zhu Y J, Ma X Y, Gao T, Pang X H, Luo K, Li Y, Li X W, Jia X C, Lin Y L, Leon C. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species.  PLoS ONE. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008613 , advance online publication 7 January 2010
  
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Wilson S R, Neubert L A, Huffman J C. The chemistry of the Euphorbiaceae. A new diterpene from Croton californicus.  J Am Chem Soc. 1979;  98 3669-3674
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Agra M F, França P F, Barbosa-Filho J M. Synopsis of the plants known as medicinal and poisonous in Northeast of Brazil.  Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2007;  17 114-140
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Yadav R P, Singh D, Singh S K, Singh A. Metabolic changes in freshwater fish Channa punctatus due to stem-bark extract of Croton tiglium.  Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2003;  6 1223-1228
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Rodriguez J A, Hiruma-Lima C A. Antiulcer activity and subacute toxicity of trans-dehydrocrotonin from Croton cajucara.  Hum Exp Toxicol. 2004;  23 455-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Antonio S, Maria L, Faria S, Giuseppina N. Traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology of Croton species (Euphorbiaceae).  J Braz Chem Soc. 2007;  18 11-33
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Tagwireyi D, Ball D E, Loga P J, Moyo S. Cantharidin poisoning due to “blister beetle” ingestion.  Toxicon. 2000;  12 1865-1869
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Meyer C P, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling.  PLoS Biol. 2005;  3 2229-2238
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Alvarez I, Wendel J F. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference.  Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003;  29 417-434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Feliner G N, Rosselló J A. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants.  Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;  44 911-919
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Chase M W, Cowan R S, Hollingsworth P M, van den Berg C, Madriñán S, Petersen G, Seberg O, Jørgsensen T, Cameron K M, Carine M. A proposal for a standardised protocol to barcode all land plants.  Taxon. 2007;  56 295-299
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kress W J, Erickson D L. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region.  PLoS ONE. 2007;  2 e508
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Coleman A W. Pan-eukaryote ITS2 homologies revealed by RNA secondary structure.  Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;  35 3322-3329
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Miao M, Warren A, Song W, Wang S, Shang H, Chen Z. Analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of scuticociliates and related taxa (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea) to infer their evolution and phylogeny.  Protist. 2008;  159 519-533
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Schultz J, Maisel S, Gerlach D, Müller T, Wolf M. A common core of secondary structure of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) throughout the Eukaryota.  RNA. 2005;  11 361-364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.  Mol Biol Evol. 2007;  24 1596-1599
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Meier R, Zhang G Y, Ali F. The use of mean instead of smallest interspecific distances exaggerates the size of the “barcoding gap” and leads to misidentification.  Syst Biol. 2008;  57 809-813
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Ross H A, Murugan S, Li W L S. Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation.  Syst Biol. 2008;  57 216-230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. PhD Shilin Chen

Institute of Medicinal Plant Development
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

No. 151 Malianwa North Road, Haidian District

100193 Beijing

China

Phone: + 86 10 62 89 97 00

Fax: + 86 10 62 89 97 76

Email: slchen@implad.ac.cn

• Supplementary Material