Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14(2): 194-200
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253160
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Muscle Injury: The Role of Imaging in Prognostic Assignment and Monitoring of Muscle Repair

John P. Slavotinek1 , 2
  • 1Division of Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
  • 2Flinders University, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 May 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Muscle injury is common among athletes, and imaging is increasingly being used to confirm injury, to assess its location, extent, and severity, and on occasion to make inferences regarding prognosis and timing of return to sports. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are accurate for diagnosis of acute injuries, but measurements of the extent of injury (cross-sectional area and longitudinal extent of muscle injury adjacent to the musculotendinous junction) have also been shown to correlate with athlete prognosis and recovery time. Specifically, normal MRI studies shortly after injury are associated with rapid (1- to 2-week) recovery and low risk of recurrent injury. Abnormal muscle cross-sectional area >55% is associated with a convalescence interval of >6 weeks, but larger measurements are not clearly associated with higher recurrence risk. The clinical value of follow-up imaging before return to competition is not established, but residual muscle abnormality is often present at this time.

KEYWORDS

Muscle injury - ultrasound - magnetic resonance imaging - prognosis - recurrent injury

REFERENCES

  • 1 Garrett Jr W E. Muscle strain injuries.  Am J Sports Med. 1996;  24(6, suppl) S2-S8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Orchard J, Best T M. The management of muscle strain injuries: an early return versus the risk of recurrence.  Clin J Sport Med. 2002;  12(1) 3-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Woods C, Hawkins R D, Maltby S, Hulse M, Thomas A, Hodson A. Football Association Medical Research Programme . The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football—analysis of hamstring injuries.  Br J Sports Med. 2004;  38(1) 36-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australian Football League, seasons 1997–2000.  Br J Sports Med. 2002;  36(1) 39-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Orchard J, Seward H. AFL injury report 2003.  J Sci Med Sport. 2004;  7 264-265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Järvinen T AH, Järvinen T LM, Kääriäinen M, Kalimo H, Järvinen M. Muscle injuries: biology and treatment.  Am J Sports Med. 2005;  33(5) 745-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Nikolaou P K, Macdonald B L, Glisson R R, Seaber A V, Garrett Jr W E. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury.  Am J Sports Med. 1987;  15(1) 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Best T M, Shehadeh S E, Leverson G, Michel J T, Corr D T, Aeschlimann D. Analysis of changes in mRNA levels of myoblast- and fibroblast-derived gene products in healing skeletal muscle using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.  J Orthop Res. 2001;  19(4) 565-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Connell D A, Schneider-Kolsky M E, Hoving J L et al.. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  183(4) 975-984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Slavotinek J P, Verrall G M, Fon G T. Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  179(6) 1621-1628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pomeranz S J, Heidt Jr R S. MR imaging in the prognostication of hamstring injury. Work in progress.  Radiology. 1993;  189(3) 897-900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cross T M, Gibbs N, Houang M T, Cameron M. Acute quadriceps muscle strains: magnetic resonance imaging features and prognosis.  Am J Sports Med. 2004;  32(3) 710-719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gibbs N J, Cross T M, Cameron M, Houang M T. The accuracy of MRI in predicting recovery and recurrence of acute grade one hamstring muscle strains within the same season in Australian Rules football players.  J Sci Med Sport. 2004;  7(2) 248-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Speer K P, Lohnes J, Garrett Jr W E. Radiographic imaging of muscle strain injury.  Am J Sports Med. 1993;  21(1) 89-95; discussion 96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Takebayashi S, Takasawa H, Banzai Y et al.. Sonographic findings in muscle strain injury: clinical and MR imaging correlation.  J Ultrasound Med. 1995;  14(12) 899-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Silder A, Heiderscheit B C, Thelen D G, Enright T, Tuite M J. MR observations of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury.  Skeletal Radiol. 2008;  37(12) 1101-1109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Orchard J, Best T M, Verrall G M. Return to play following muscle strains.  Clin J Sport Med. 2005;  15(6) 436-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Verrall G M, Slavotinek J P, Barnes P G, Fon G T, Esterman A. Assessment of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings of hamstring injury as predictors for recurrent injury.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;  36(4) 215-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

John P SlavotinekM.B.B.S. 

Division of Medical Imaging, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive

Bedford Park 5042, South Australia, Australia

Email: john.slavotinek@flinders.edu.au

      >