Pragmatik und Aphasie

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Patienten mit Aphasie zeigen neben typischen linguistischen Defiziten auch pragmatische Defizite, wobei die Differenzierung gegenüber funktional-kommunikativen Leistungen nicht immer leicht ist. Charakteristische pragmatische Probleme sind zum Beispiel ein reduzierter Informationsgehalt, ein veränderter Umgang mit Reparaturen, eingeschränkte Kohäsion und Kohärenz sowie andersartige Anpassungsprozesse im Gespräch. Neben Verfahren, bei denen die gesprochene Sprache anhand verschiedener Parameter analysiert wird (z. B. das Assessment Protocol of Pragmatic Linguistic Skills – APPLS [36], [56]) sind für den deutschen Sprachraum besonders Befragungen und Testbatterien relevant. Therapeutisch gibt es zum einen Materialien, die sich mit spezifischen Aspekten der Pragmatik (z. B. der Kohäsion) befassen, zum anderen wird aus dem Englischen das „Speaking Out”-Programm von Worrall und Yiu kurz vorgestellt [74]. Insgesamt lässt sich sagen, dass Aphasie und Pragmatik zurzeit noch zu wenig in Zusammenhang gebracht werden und dass in Zukunft pragmatische Aspekte einen essenziellen Teil der Betrachtung aphasischer Störungen darstellen sollten. Dieser Aspekt ist speziell unter Berücksichtigung des Teilhabegedankens der ICF von hoher Relevanz.

Abstract

Patients with aphasia primarily show linguistic deficits but they also have pragmatic difficulties. Typical pragmatic challenges of aphasic patients are modified repair sequences, reduced cohesion and coherence, limited information content, unclear thematic structure and different adaptation processes in dialogue compared to healthy control subjects. In German there are 3 categories of diagnostic methods to assess pragmatic disorders in aphasic patients. First of all we use analyses of spoken language where the aphasic speech production is rated along a variety of parameters. Good examples are the Pragmatic Protocol [57] and the Assessment Protocol of Pragmatic Linguistic Skills – APPLS [56]. Questionnaires answered by patients, relatives or speech language pathologists often comparing actual with premorbid pragmatic competence present a second possibility. Finally, there are some test batteries that focus on pragmatic and/or communicative competence like the ANELT [66], [67] and the Right Hemisphere Language Battery [70]. It is difficult to find an appropriate evaluated pragmatic therapeutic program. Specific aspects of pragmatic behaviour are trained by specially developed material. Additionally, we will present the Speaking Out Program by Worrall and Yiu [74]. In conclusion, it is argued that aphasia and pragmatics should still be more connected. In the future we will more often need a pragmatic approach to aphasic disorders. In this context the differentiation between pragmatic and communicative deficits will be discussed. Communicative aspects will be of special importance with respect to functioning and participation in terms of the ICF.

• 1 Kyrozis A, Potagas C, Ghika A. et al . Incidence and predictors of post-stroke aphasia: The Arcadia Stroke Registry.  European Journal of Neurology. 2009;  16 733-739
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H. et al . Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery.  Ann Neurol. 1995;  38 659-666
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Cutica I, Bucciarelli M, Bara BG. Neuropragmatics: extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right hemisphere damaged patients.  Brain & Language. 2006;  98 12-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Penn C. Pragmatic assessment and therapy for persons with brain damage: What have clinicians gleaned in two decades?.  Brain and Language. 1999;  68 535-552
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ulatowska HK, Streit Olness G, Williams LJ. Coherence of narratives in aphasia.  Brain and Language. 2004;  91 42-43
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Christiansen JA. Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics.  Brain & Language. 1995;  51 291-317
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Brenneise-Sarshad R, Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. Effects of apparent listener knowledge and picture stimuli on aphasic and non-brain-damaged speaker's narrative discourse.  Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1991;  34 168-176
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia.  Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1993;  36 338-350
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Laakso M, Klippi A. A closer look at the ‘hint and guess’ sequences in aphasic conversation.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 345-363
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ferguson A. The influence of aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair.  Aphasiology. 1994;  8 143-157
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Jaecks P, Hielscher-Fastabend M. Emotional Alignment in Communication.. Proceedings of the 38th Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Wyoming, USA; 2008
  Google Scholar
• 12 Cruice M, Hill R, Worrall L. et al . Conceptualising quality of life for older people with aphasia.  Aphasiology 2009; 24 327-347
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Holzhausen MU, Bornschlegel X, Fischer T. Die Patientenperspektive in der Erfassung von Lebensqualität im Alter.  Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 2009;  42 355-359
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Glindemann R, Ziegler W, Kilian B. Aphasie und Kommunikation.. In: Goldenberg G, Pössl J, Ziegler W, Hrsg. Neuropsychologie im Alltag. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2002: 78-94
  Google Scholar
• 15 Knapp K, Antos G, Becker-Mrotzek M. et al .Angewandte Linguistik. Ein Lehrbuch.. Tübingen/Basel: A. Francke Verlag; 2004
  Google Scholar
• 16 WHO .International Classification of Functioning.. Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 17 Mayer JF, Murray LL. Functional measures of naming in aphasia: word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 481-497
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Wilkinson R. Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: analysis and implications for therapy.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 327-343
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Damico JS, Simmons-Mackie NN, Schweitzer LA. Addressing the third law of gardening: Methodological alternatives in aphasiology.  Clinical Aphasiology. 1995;  23 83-93
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Perkins L, Crisp J, Walshaw D. Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: the issue of reliability.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 259-281
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ross KR, Wertz RT. Possible demographic influences on differentiating normal form aphasic performance.  Journal of Communication Disorders. 2001;  34 115-130
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Beausoleil N, Fortin R, LeBlanc B. et al . Unconstrained oral naming performance in right- and left-hemisphere-damaged individuals: when education overrides the lesion.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 143-158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Harris Wright H, Capilouto GJ, Wagovich SA. et al . Development and reliability of a quantitative measure of adults’ narratives.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 263-273
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Byrne ME, Crowe TA, Hale ST. et al . Metalinguistic and pragmatic abilities of participants in adult literacy programs.  J Commun Disord. 1996;  29 37-49
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Glosser G, Deser T. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders.  Brain and Language. 1990;  40 67-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Lock S, Armstrong L. Cohesion analysis of the expository discourse of normal, fluent aphasic and demented adults: a role in differential diagnosis?.  Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 1997;  11 299-317
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Regenbrecht F, Huber W, Glindemann R. Zum Verhältnis von Kohärenz und Kohäsion bei Aphasie.. Rickheit G, Mellies R, Winnecken A, Hrsg. Linguistische Aspekte der Sprachtherapie. Forschung und Interven­tion bei Sprachstörungen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag; 1992: 111-137
  Google Scholar
• 28 Halliday MAK, Hasan R. Cohesion in English.. Bath: Longman; 1976
  Google Scholar
• 29 Jaecks P. Restaphasie. Eine empirische Untersuchung von linguistischer Symptomatik, Gesprächsverhalten, Differenzialdiagnose und Ursache minimal aphasischer Störungen nach Schlaganfall.. Dissertation: Universität Bielefeld; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 30 Klocke P, Lingnau O. Spontansprache bei Restaphasie.. Magisterarbeit. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld; 2002
  Google Scholar
• 31 Asp ED, de Villiers J. When Language Breaks Down: Analysing Discourse in Clinical Contexts.. Cambridge University Press; 2010
  Google Scholar
• 32 Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. Presence, Completeness, and Accuracy of Main Concepts in the connected Speech of Non-Brain-Damaged Adults and Adults with Aphasia.  Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1995;  38 145-156
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Ulatowska HK, Olness GS. Pragmatics in discourse performance: Insights from aphasiology.  Seminars in Speech & Language. 2007;  28 148-157
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Lindsay J, Wilkinson R. Repair sequences in aphasic talk: a comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 305-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Bongartz R. Kommunikationstraining mit Aphasikern und Angehörigen.  Neurolinguistik. 1996;  10 1-28
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Bongartz R. Kommunikationstherapie mit Aphasikern und Angehörigen.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 37 Lesser R. Conversation analysis and aphasia therapy.. In: Papathana­siou I, Hrsg. The sciences of aphasia: from theory to therapy. European Research Conference on Aphasia (1st: Hagia Pelagia, Griechenland); 2003
  Google Scholar
• 38 Lesser R, Milroy L. Linguistics and Aphasia: psycholinguistic and pragmatic aspects of intervention.. London: Longman; 1993
  Google Scholar
• 39 Milroy L, Perkins L. Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: towards a collaborative model.  Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. 1992;  6 27-40
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Crockford C, Lesser R. Assessing functional communication in aphasia Clinical utility and time demands of three methods.  European Journal of Disorders of Communication. 1994;  29 165-182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Ferguson A. Conversational repair of word-finding difficulty.  Clinical Aphasiology. 1992;  21 299-310
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Bauer A, Auer P. Aphasie im Alltag.. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 43 Linell P, Korolija N. On the division of communicative labour within episodes in aphasic discourse.  International Journal of Psycholinguistics. 1995;  11 143-165
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Kennedy MRT, Strand EA, Burton W. et al . Analysis of first-encounter conversations of right-hemisphere-damaged adults.  Clinical Aphasiology. 1994;  22 67-80
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Ulatowska HK, Allard L, Reyes BA. et al . Conversational Discourse in Aphasia – Short Report.  Aphasiology. 1992;  6 325-331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Honda R, Tachioe M, Watamori TS. Production of discourse in high-functioning individuals with aphasia with reference to performance on the Japanese CADL.  Aphasiology. 1999;  13 475-493
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Pickering MJ, Garrod S. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2004;  27 169-226
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Hielscher-Fastabend M, Jaecks P, Schneider B. Variationen emotionaler Kommunikation.. In: Lenz S, Hrsg. Schlüsselqualifikation Sprache: Anforderungen – Standards – Vermittlung. Forum Angewandte Linguistik. Tübingen: Lang; 2009: 205-233
  Google Scholar
• 49 Rieser H. Aligned iconic gesture in different strata of mm route-description dialogue.  In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue 2008;  167-174
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Saffran EM, Martin N. Effects of structural priming on sentence production in aphasics.  Language and Cognitive Processes. 1997;  12 877-882
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Hartsuiker RJ, Kolk HHJ. Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production.  Brain and Language. 1998;  62 221-254
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Kolk HHJ. Syntactic impairment is the bottleneck to communication in nonfluent aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2001;  15 381-385
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Haker H, Rössler W. Empathy in schizophrenia: impaired resonance.  European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience. 2009;  259 352-361
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Hadjikhani N, Joseph RM, Manoach DS. et al . Body expressions of emotion do not trigger fear contagion in autism spectrum disorder.  Scan. 2009;  4 70-78
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Hartsuiker RJ, Bernolet S, Schoonbaert S. et al . Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue.  Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;  58 214-238
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Gerber S, Gurland GB. Applied pragmatics in the assessment of aphasia (APPLS).  Seminars in Speech and Language. 1989;  10 263-281
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Prutting CA, Kirchner DM. A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language.  Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. 1987;  52 105-119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Avent JR, Wertz RT. Influence of type of aphasia and type of treatment on aphasic patient's pragmatic performance.  Aphasiology. 1996;  10 253-265
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Herrmann M, Koch U, Johannsen-Horbach H. et al . Communicative skills in chronic and severe non-fluent aphasia.  Brain and Language. 1989;  37 339-352
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Whitworth A, Perkins L, Lesser R. Conversation Analysis Profile for People with Aphasia (CAPPA).. London: Whurr Publishers; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 61 Cavallo MM, Kay T, Ezrachi O. Problems and changes after traumatic brain injury: Differing perceptions within and between families.  Brain Injury. 1992;  6 327-335
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 McNeill-Brown DL, Douglas JM. Perceptions of communication skills in severely brain injured adults.  Paper presented at the Fifth International Association for the Study of Traumatic Brain Injury Conference, Melbourne (Australia). 1996; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Lomas J, Pickard L, Bester S. et al . The communicative effectiveness index: development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia.  J of Speech Hear Dis. 1989;  54 113-124
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Schlenck C, Schlenck KJ. Beratung und Betreuung von Angehörigen aphasischer Patienten.  LOGOS Interdisziplinär. 1994;  2 90-97
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Douglas JM, O’Flaherty CA, Snow PC. Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire. In: Aphasiology; 2000 14: 251-268
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Blomert L. Everday Language Test (ANELT).. Lisse, NL: Swets Test Services; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 67 Blomert L, Kean ML, Koster Ch. et al . Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test: construction, reliability and validity.  Aphasiology. 1994;  8 381-407
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 van der Meulen I, van de Sandt-Koenderman WME, Duivenvoorden HJ. et al . Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test Research Report.  International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. 2010;  im Druck
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Holland A, Frattali C, Fromm D. Communication Activities of Daily Living.. 2nd Ed. Examiner's Manual. Austin/Texas: Pro-ed; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 70 Bryan KL. The Right Hemisphere Language Battery.. Kibworth, England: Far Communications; 1989
  Google Scholar
• 71 Bryan KL, Hale JB. Differential effects of left and right cerebral vascular accidents on language competency.  J of the Int Neuropsycho Soc. 2001;  7 655-664
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Incorporating parameters of natural conversa­tion in treatment.. In: Chapey R Hrsg. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. Baltimore, London: Williams & Wilkins; 1981
  Google Scholar
• 73 Davis GA, Wilcox MJ. Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics.. London: NFER-Nelson; 1985
  Google Scholar
• 74 Worrall L, Yiu E. Effectiveness of functional communication therapy by volunteers for people with aphasia following stroke.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14 911-924
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Schreiber J, Lahrmann T. Connect: Therapiematerial zur Verarbeitung textverbindender Elemente.. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag; 2002
  Google Scholar
• 76 Volkmann B, Siebörger F, Ferstl E. Spaß beiseite?. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag; 2008
  Google Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Dr. P. Jaecks

Universität Bielefeld

Sonderforschungsbereich 673

Fakultät für Linguistik u.

Literaturwissenschaft

Postfach 100131

33501 Bielefeld

Email: petra.jaecks@uni-bielefeld.de

• Supplementary Material