Endoscopy 2010; 42(8): 647-651
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1255591
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal carcinoid tumors: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection

D.  S.  Lee1 , S.  W.  Jeon1 , S.  Y.  Park1 , M.  K.  Jung1 , C.  M.  Cho1 , W.  Y.  Tak1 , Y.  O.  Kweon1 , S.  K.  Kim1
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 6 January 2010

accepted after revision 13 June 2010

Publication Date:
28 July 2010 (online)

Background and study aims: Rectal carcinoid tumors are often found incidentally during screening colonoscopy and can be resected using various endoscopic techniques. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for rectal carcinoid tumors.

Patients and methods: Between January 2003 and June 2009, 74 patients (74 lesions) underwent either EMR (n = 28) or ESD (n = 46) for rectal carcinoid tumors. The rate of endoscopic complete resection, pathological complete resection, procedure complications, and tumor recurrence were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: The endoscopic complete resection rate was significantly higher in the ESD group (46 lesions, 100 %) compared with the EMR group (25 lesions, 89.3 %) (P = 0.049). The pathological complete resection rate was higher in the ESD group (38 lesions, 82.6 %) compared with the EMR group (18 lesions, 64.3 %); however, this difference was borderline significant (P = 0.067). Overall complication rate was not significantly different between the EMR group (3.6 %) and the ESD group (6.3 %). There was one case of remnant lesion in the EMR group, which was managed by ESD, and no recurrence has been detected in either the EMR or ESD groups.

Conclusion: This study suggests that ESD might be a feasible treatment technique for small rectal carcinoid tumors. It showed superior efficacy and comparable safety to EMR.

References

  • 1 Modlin I M, Lye K D, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors.  Cancer. 2003;  97 934-959
  • 2 Jetmore A B, Ray J E, Gathright Jr. J B. et al . Rectal carcinoids: the most frequent carcinoid tumor.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 717-725
  • 3 Modlin I M, Oberg K, Chung D C. et al . Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.  Lancet Oncol. 2008;  9 61-72
  • 4 Scherubl H. Options for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.  Lancet Oncol. 2008;  9 203
  • 5 Shim K N, Yang S K, Myung S J. et al . Atypical endoscopic features of rectal carcinoids.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 313-316
  • 6 Soga J. Early-stage carcinoids of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of 1914 reported cases.  Cancer. 2005;  103 1587-1595
  • 7 Moon J H, Kim J H, Park C H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal resection with double ligation technique for treatment of small rectal carcinoid tumors.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 511-514
  • 8 Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Yano H. et al . More effective endoscopic resection with a two-channel colonoscope for carcinoid tumors of the rectum.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 1438-1439
  • 9 Imada-Shirakata Y, Sakai M, Kajiyama T. et al . Endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoid tumors using aspiration lumpectomy.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 34-38
  • 10 Oshitani N, Hamasaki N, Sawa Y. et al . Endoscopic resection of small rectal carcinoid tumours using an aspiration method with a transparent overcap.  J Int Med Res. 2000;  28 241-246
  • 11 Ono A, Fujii T, Saito Y. et al . Endoscopic submucosal resection of rectal carcinoid tumors with a ligation device.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 583-587
  • 12 Nagai T, Torishima R, Nakashima H. et al . Saline-assisted endoscopic resection of rectal carcinoids: cap aspiration method versus simple snare resection.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 202-205
  • 13 Onozato Y, Kakizaki S, Ishihara H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 423-427
  • 14 Mashimo Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T. et al . Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device is an effective and safe treatment for carcinoid tumors in the lower rectum.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  23 218-221
  • 15 Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno R M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer.  J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 929-942
  • 16 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I. et al . Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 877-883
  • 17 Onozato Y, Ishihara H, Iizuka H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and large flat adenomas.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 980-986
  • 18 Scherubl H. Rectal carcinoids are on the rise: early detection by screening endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 162-165
  • 19 Kwaan M R, Goldberg J E, Bleday R. Rectal carcinoid tumors: review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy.  Arch Surg. 2008;  143 471-475
  • 20 Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J. et al . Prognosis and risk factors of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids: results of a nationwide registry over 15 years.  Gut. 2007;  56 863-868
  • 21 Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 100-107

S. W. JeonMD 

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Department of Internal Medicine
Kyungpook National University Hospital

50 Samdukdong 2-Ga
Jung-gu
Daegu
South Korea

Fax: +82-53-4268773

Email: sw-jeon@hanmail.net

    >