Diagnosis of colorectal lesions with a novel endocytoscopic classification – a pilot study

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Recent advances in endocytoscopy have enabled in vivo evaluation not on ly of structural atypia, but also of cellular atypia with observation of lumens and nuclei in the surface layer of the mucosa. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the usefulness of our novel endocytoscopic classification in colorectal lesions.

Patients and methods: A total of 206 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study and underwent endocytoscopic examination. Endocytoscopic images were stored electronically and two endoscopists blinded to the findings at live examination assigned them diagnoses using the endocytoscopic (EC) classification. The endocytoscopic diagnosis was then compared to the final histopathological diagnosis.

Results: In all, 196 patients with 213 specimens were available for analysis. All normal mucosae were classified as EC1a and all hyperplastic polyps as EC1b. Dysplasias were mainly classified as EC2, while massively invasive submucosal cancers (SMm) or worse, which have the possibility of metastasis, were mainly EC3b. Assuming that an EC1b classification was diagnostic of hyperplastic polyps, we were able to differentiate nonneoplastic from neoplastic lesions with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 100 % (P < 0.05). Assuming that an EC3b classification was diagnostic of SMm or worse, we were able to differentiate “SMm or worse” from other neoplastic lesions (dysplasias and slightly invasive submucosal cancers) with a sensitivity of 90.1 % and a specificity of 99.2 % (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The endocytoscopic classification was particularly useful for differentiating between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions and between “SMm or worse” and other neoplastic lesions, which in the case of colorectal neoplasms would help to determine treatment.

• References

• 1 Kudo S, Hirota S, Nakajima T et al Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47: 880-885
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR et al Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 367-373
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Inoue H, Kazawa T, Sato Y et al In vivo observation of living cancer cells in the esophagus, stomach, and colon using catheter-type contact endoscope, “Endo–Cytoscopy system”. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2004; 14: 589-594, x - xi
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Sasajima K, Kudo SE, Inoue H et al Real-time in vivo virtual histology of colorectal lesions when using the endocytoscopy system. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 1010-1017
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hamou J, Salat-Baroux J, Coupez F, De Brux J. Microhysteroscopy: a new approach to the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 567-574
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Andrea M, Dias O, Santos A. Contact endoscopy of the vocal cord: normal and pathological patterns. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115: 314-316
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Kumagai Y, Monma K, Kawada K. Magnifying chromoendoscopy of the esophagus: in-vivo pathological diagnosis using an endocytoscopy system. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 590-594
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Inoue H, Kudo SE, Shiokawa A. Technology insight: Laser-scanning confocal microscopy and endocytoscopy for cellular observation of the gastrointestinal tract. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 2: 31-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Inoue H, Sasajima K, Kaga M et al Endoscopic in vivo evaluation of tissue atypia in the esophagus using a newly designed integrated endocytoscope: a pilot trial. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 891-895
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Salerno R et al Endocytoscopic classification of preneoplastic lesions in the colorectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 1111-1116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Kudo S-E, Wakamura K, Kashida H, Ikehara N. Real time diagnosis in the colorectum with integrated type endocytoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB209
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T et al Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 8-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Kudo S, Tamegai Y, Yamano H et al Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2001; 11: 519-535
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Tsuruta O, Toyonaga A, Ikeda H, Tanikawa K. Clinicopathological study of superficial-type invasive carcinoma of the colorectum: special reference to lymph node metastasis. Int J Oncol 1997; 10: 1003-1008
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Inoue H, Kudo SE, Shiokawa A. Novel endoscopic imaging techniques toward in vivo observation of living cancer cells in the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 334-337
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Kudo SE, Takemura O, Ohtsuka K. Flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancers: from East to West. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008; 18: 581-593, xi
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Sakashita M, Inoue H, Kashida H et al Virtual histology of colorectal lesions using laser - scanning confocal microscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 1033-1038
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Kiesslich R, Burg J, Vieth M et al Confocal laser endoscopy for diagnosing intraepithelial neoplasias and colorectal cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 706-713
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Olliver JR, Wild CP, Sahay P et al Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue and associated DNA damage in Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet 2003; 362: 373-374
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kodashima S, Fujishiro M, Takubo K et al Ex - vivo study of high-magnification chromoendoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract to determine the optimal staining conditions for endocytoscopy. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 1115-1121
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar