Management of Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Associated with a Parental Carrier of a Reciprocal Translocation: A Systematic Review

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This study reviews systematically the effectiveness of management strategies for carriers of a reciprocal translocation involving two chromosomes, ascertained on the basis of recurrent pregnancy loss. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes were tabulated based on whether management was medical or involved in vitro fertilization/preimplantation genetic diagnosis (IVF/PGD). A total of 129 cases from 13 articles met the criteria, of which 89% were managed medically. Before management, the overall live birthrate was 4% (19 of 484 pregnancies). Management was medical in 109 cases and IVF/PGD in 20 cases. Cumulative live birthrate was 74% (81 of 109 cases) in the medical management group and 35% (7 of 20) in the IVF/PGD group. Based on this systematic review, successful pregnancy outcomes are high following either medical management or IVF/PGD for carriers of a reciprocal translocation, ascertained on the basis of recurrent pregnancy loss. But it is difficult to compare outcomes directly for these two strategies because of the different end points reported. Understanding the differences is essential for effective counseling. Until a well-designed study comparing the two strategies is performed, or at least prospective cohort studies with strict entry criteria and definitions, the cumulative experience and success of both medical management and IVF/PGD must be used to counsel patients who are carriers of a reciprocal translocation, ascertained on the basis of recurrent pregnancy loss.

REFERENCES

• 1 Roman E. Fetal loss rates and their relation to pregnancy order.  J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984;  38 (1) 29-35
  Google Scholar
• 2 Stephenson M D. Management of recurrent early pregnancy loss.  J Reprod Med. 2006;  51 (4) 303-310
  Google Scholar
• 3 Goddijn M, Joosten J H, Knegt A C et al.. Clinical relevance of diagnosing structural chromosome abnormalities in couples with repeated miscarriage.  Hum Reprod. 2004;  19 (4) 1013-1017
  Google Scholar
• 4 Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Fujii T et al.. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes in recurrent miscarriage patients with a paternal or maternal carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement.  J Hum Genet. 2008;  53 (7) 622-628
  Google Scholar
• 5 Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sato T, Suzumori N, Suzumori K. Poor prognosis of recurrent aborters with either maternal or paternal reciprocal translocations.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 (2) 367-373
  Google Scholar
• 6 Stephenson M D. Frequency of factors associated with habitual abortion in 197 couples.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  66 (1) 24-29
  Google Scholar
• 7 Stephenson M D, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement.  Hum Reprod. 2006;  21 (4) 1076-1082
  Google Scholar
• 8 Carp H, Feldman B, Oelsner G, Schiff E. Parental karyotype and subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage.  Fertil Steril. 2004;  81 (5) 1296-1301
  Google Scholar
• 9 Franssen M T, Korevaar J C, van der Veen F, Leschot N J, Bossuyt P M, Goddijn M. Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study.  BMJ. 2006;  332 (7544) 759-763
  Google Scholar
• 10 Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  94 (1) 283-289
  Google Scholar
• 11 Verlinsky Y, Tur-Kaspa I, Cieslak J et al.. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-prognosis patients.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;  11 (2) 219-225
  Google Scholar
• 12 Otani T, Roche M, Mizuike M, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly improves the pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers with a history of recurrent miscarriage and unsuccessful pregnancies.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;  13 (6) 869-874
  Google Scholar
• 13 Ozawa N, Maruyama T, Nagashima T et al.. Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers who have a history of repeated pregnancy loss.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  90 (4) 1301-1304
  Google Scholar
• 14 Escudero T, Estop A, Fischer J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements.  Am J Med Genet A. 2008;  146A (13) 1662-1669
  Google Scholar
• 15 Coonen E, Martini E, Dumoulin J C et al.. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a reciprocal translocation t(3;11)(q27.3;q24.3) in siblings.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;  6 (3) 199-206
  Google Scholar
• 16 Escudero T, Lee M, Sandalinas M, Munné S. Female gamete segregation in two carriers of translocations involving 2q and 14q.  Prenat Diagn. 2000;  20 (3) 235-237
  Google Scholar
• 17 Jobanputra V, Chung W K, Hacker A M, Emanuel B S, Warburton D. A unique case of der(11)t(11;22),-22 arising from 3:1 segregation of a maternal t(11;22) in a family with co-segregation of the translocation and breast cancer.  Prenat Diagn. 2005;  25 (8) 683-686
  Google Scholar
• 18 Lim C K, Cho J W, Kim J Y, Kang I S, Shim S H, Jun J H. A healthy live birth after successful preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers of complex chromosome rearrangements.  Fertil Steril. 2008;  90 (5) 1680-1684
  Google Scholar
• 19 Munné S, Morrison L, Fung J et al.. Spontaneous abortions are reduced after preconception diagnosis of translocations.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;  15 (5) 290-296
  Google Scholar
• 20 Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L, Cohen J. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  73 (6) 1209-1218
  Google Scholar
• 21 Munné S, Scott R, Sable D, Cohen J. First pregnancies after preconception diagnosis of translocations of maternal origin.  Fertil Steril. 1998;  69 (4) 675-681
  Google Scholar
• 22 Pal S, Ma S O, Norhasimah M et al.. Chromosomal abnormalities and reproductive outcome in Malaysian couples with miscarriages.  Singapore Med J. 2009;  50 (10) 1008-1012
  Google Scholar
• 23 Simopoulou M, Harper J C, Fragouli E et al.. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities: implications from the outcome for couples with chromosomal rearrangements.  Prenat Diagn. 2003;  23 (8) 652-662
  Google Scholar
• 24 Wiland E, Hobel C J, Hill D, Kurpisz M. Successful pregnancy after preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carrier of t(2;7)(p11.2;q22) with high rates of unbalanced sperm and embryos: a case report.  Prenat Diagn. 2008;  28 (1) 36-41
  Google Scholar
• 25 Willadsen S, Levron J, Munné S et al.. Rapid visualization of metaphase chromosomes in single human blastomeres after fusion with in-vitro matured bovine eggs.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 (2) 470-475
  Google Scholar
• 26 Lee R M, Silver R M. Recurrent pregnancy loss: summary and clinical recommendations.  Semin Reprod Med. 2000;  18 (4) 433-440
  Google Scholar
• 27 Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage.  Lancet. 2006;  368 (9535) 601-611
  Google Scholar
• 28 Stephenson M D, Awartani K A, Robinson W P. Cytogenetic analysis of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-control study.  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 (2) 446-451
  Google Scholar
• 29 De Braekeleer M, Dao T N. Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses.  Hum Reprod. 1990;  5 (5) 519-528
  Google Scholar
• 30 Simpson J L, Elias S, Martin A O. Parental chromosomal rearrangements associated with repetitive spontaneous abortions.  Fertil Steril. 1981;  36 (5) 584-590
  Google Scholar
• 31 Stephenson M D, Goddijn M. A critical look at the evidence does not support PGD for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses.  Fertil Steril. 2011;  95 (1) e1, author reply e2
  Google Scholar
• 32 Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology PGD Consortium et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VIII: cycles from January to December 2005 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2006.  Hum Reprod. 2008;  23 (12) 2629-2645
  Google Scholar
• 33 Goossens V, Harton G, Moutou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Van Rij M, Harper J C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IX: cycles from January to December 2006 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2007.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 (8) 1786-1810
  Google Scholar
• 34 Harper J C, de Die-Smulders C, Goossens V et al.. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection VII: cycles from January to December 2004 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2005.  Hum Reprod. 2008;  23 (4) 741-755
  Google Scholar
• 35 Barlow D H. The design, publication and interpretation of research in Subfertility Medicine: uncomfortable issues and challenges to be faced.  Hum Reprod. 2003;  18 (5) 899-901
  Google Scholar
• 36 Grimes D A, Schulz K F, Raymond E G. Surrogate end points in women's health research: science, protoscience, and pseudoscience.  Fertil Steril. 2010;  93 (6) 1731-1734
  Google Scholar
• 37 Franssen M T, Musters A M, van der Veen F et al.. Reproductive outcome after PGD in couples with recurrent miscarriage carrying a structural chromosome abnormality: a systematic review.  Hum Reprod Update. 2011;  17 (4) 467-475
  Google Scholar
• 38 Musters A M, Repping S, Korevaar J C et al.. Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of the best available evidence.  Fertil Steril. 2011;  95 (6) 2153-2157, 2157, e1–e3
  Google Scholar

Mary D. StephensonM.D. M.Sc. 

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago

5841 S. Maryland Avenue (MC 2050), Chicago, IL 60637

Email: mstephen@babies.bsd.uchicago.edu