Risk Factors for Distal Contegra Stenosis: Results of a Prospective European Multicentre Study

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Objectives The EUCon study was designed to identify risk factors for distal anastomotic stenosis after bovine jugular vein (Contegra) implantation in children.

Methods Between March 2006 and August 2008, 104 devices were implanted in nine European centers. Preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up data (at discharge, 6, 12, 24 months) including standardized echocardiography were prospectively registered, source data verified and collected in a central database. Main endpoint was distal stenosis (either postvalvular gradient of ≥50 mm Hg or need for intervention for distal stenosis). Eight potential risk factors (age <2 years, diagnosis, running suture, use of glue, flapless anastomosis, oversizing less than + 2 z, anticoagulation, implantation site) were investigated. Cox regression, decision tree analyses, and “Clustering by Response” were applied.

Results Patient age ranged from 0 to18 years, mean 6.0 ± 6.1, median 3.2 years. Implantation reasons: 88% congenital malformations, 12% Ross operations. Follow-up was 88.3% complete. Durability (freedom from death, reoperation, degeneration, endocarditis, and explantation) compared well to corresponding homograft literature. Sixteen patients reached study endpoints. Age <2 years was the only invariably significant risk factor (p = 0.044); “Clustering By Response” found young anticoagulated patients with oversized conduits to be at a higher risk than the others (p = 0.018, OR = 3.2).

Conclusion Patient age is the main risk factor for development of distal anastomosis stenosis after Contegra implantation. The influence of the other investigated factors is too small to be proven in 104 patients after 2 years, or other risk factors must be taken into consideration to explain outcome differences among recipients under 2 years.

• References

• 1 Tiete AR, Sachweh JS, Roemer U, Kozlik-Feldmann R, Reichart B, Daebritz SH. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with the Contegra bovine jugular vein conduit: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (6) 2151-2156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kadner A, Dave H, Stallmach T, Turina M, Prêtre R. Formation of a stenotic fibrotic membrane at the distal anastomosis of bovine jugular vein grafts (Contegra) after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127 (1) 285-286
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Urso S, Rega F, Meuris B , et al. The Contegra conduit in the right ventricular outflow tract is an independent risk factor for graft replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 40 (3) 603-609
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Dave H, Mueggler O, Comber M , et al. Risk factor analysis of 170 single-institutional contegra implantations in pulmonary position. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91 (1) 195-302, discussion 202–203
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Breymann T, Blanz U, Wojtalik MA , et al. European Contegra multicentre study: 7-year results after 165 valved bovine jugular vein graft implantations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 57 (5) 257-269
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Therneau TMAB, Ripley B. rpart. 2010 ; Available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rpart/index.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hecker HWP. Clustering by Response. 1997 Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8V-3SWV885-F/2/e8d231c824670c0e1d134b1ffa0bc56b
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Dittrich S, Alexi-Meskishvili VV, Yankah AC , et al. Comparison of porcine xenografts and homografts for pulmonary valve replacement in children. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70 (3) 717-722
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Feier H, Collart F, Ghez O , et al. Risk factors, dynamics, and cutoff values for homograft stenosis after the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79 (5) 1669-1675, discussion 1675
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Breymann T, Thies WR, Boethig D, Goerg R, Blanz U, Koerfer R. Bovine valved venous xenografts for RVOT reconstruction: results after 71 implantations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21 (4) 703-710, discussion 710
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Boethig D, Thies WR, Hecker H, Breymann T. Mid term course after pediatric right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: a comparison of homografts, porcine xenografts and Contegras. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27 (1) 58-66
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Sekarski N, van Meir H, Rijlaarsdam ME , et al. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with the bovine jugular vein graft: 5 years' experience with 133 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84 (2) 599-605
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Meyns B, Van Garsse L, Boshoff D , et al. The Contegra conduit in the right ventricular outflow tract induces supravalvular stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128 (6) 834-840
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Karamlou T, Blackstone EH, Hawkins JA , et al; Pulmonary Conduit Working Group for the members of the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society. Can pulmonary conduit dysfunction and failure be reduced in infants and children less than age 2 years at initial implantation?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132 (4) 829-838
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Christenson JT, Sierra J, Colina Manzano NE, Jolou J, Beghetti M, Kalangos A. Homografts and xenografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (4) 1287-1293
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar