Comparative Analysis of 2-D Versus 3-D Ultrasound Estimation of the Fetal Adrenal Gland Volume and Prediction of Preterm Birth

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective We aim to test the hypothesis that two-dimensional (2-D) fetal adrenal gland volume (AGV) measurements offer similar volume estimates as volume calculations based on 3-D technique.

Methods Fetal AGV was estimated by three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound (VOCAL) in 93 women with signs/symptoms of preterm labor and 73 controls. Fetal AGV was calculated using an ellipsoid formula derived from 2-D measurements of the same blocks (0.523 × length × width × depth). Comparisons were performed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of repeatability, and Bland-Altman method. The corrected AGV (cAGV; AGV/fetal weight) was calculated for both methods and compared for prediction of preterm birth (PTB) within 7 days.

Results Among 168 volumes, there was a significant correlation between 3-D and 2-D methods (ICC = 0.979; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.971 to 0.984). The coefficient of repeatability for the 3-D was superior to the 2-D method (intraobserver 3-D: 30.8, 2-D:57.6; interobserver 3-D:12.2, 2-D: 15.6). Based on 2-D calculations, cAGV ≥ 433 mm³/kg was best for prediction of PTB (sensitivity: 75%, 95% CI = 59 to 87; specificity: 89%, 95% CI = 82 to 94). Sensitivity and specificity for the 3-D cAGV (cutoff ≥ 420 mm³/kg) was 85% (95% CI = 70 to 94) and 95% (95% CI = 90 to 98), respectively. In receiver-operating-curve curve analysis, 3-D cAGV was superior to 2-D cAGV for prediction of PTB (z = 1.99, p = 0.047).

Conclusion 2-D volume estimation of fetal adrenal gland using ellipsoid formula cannot replace 3-D AGV calculations for prediction of PTB.

• References

• 1 ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin. Management of preterm labor. Number 43, May 2003. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003; 82: 127-135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Liu S, Heaman M, Sauve R , et al; Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991–2003. Matern Child Health J 2007; 11: 181-187
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Heron M, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: leading causes for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 58: 1-97
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD , et al. Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010; 58: 1-85
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 402-412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Sanchez-Ramos L, Delke I, Zamora J, Kaunitz AM. Fetal fibronectin as a short-term predictor of preterm birth in symptomatic patients: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 631-640
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Turan OM, Turan S, Funai EF, Buhimschi IA, Copel JA, Buhimschi CS. Fetal adrenal gland volume: a novel method to identify women at risk for impending preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 855-862
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Droste S, Fitzsimmons J, Pascoe-Mason J, Shepard TH, Mack LA. Size of the fetal adrenal in bilateral renal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 206-209
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Ravichandran G, Fellows GJ. The accuracy of a hand-held real time ultrasound scanner for estimating bladder volume. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 25-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Partik BL, Stadler A, Schamp S , et al. 3D versus 2D ultrasound: accuracy of volume measurement in human cadaver kidneys. Invest Radiol 2002; 37: 489-495
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Goldstein SR, Horii SC, Snyder JR, Raghavendra BN, Subramanyam B. Estimation of nongravid uterine volume based on a nomogram of gravid uterine volume: its value in gynecologic uterine abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72: 86-90
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Turan OM, Turan S, Funai EF , et al. Ultrasound measurement of fetal adrenal gland enlargement: an accurate predictor of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204: 311 , e1–e10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Koch GG. Intraclass correlation coefficient. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL, eds. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1982: 213-217
  Google Scholar
• 14 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Foy R, Warner P. About time: diagnostic guidelines that help clinicians. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 205-209
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Wang ST, Pizzolato S, Demshar HP. Receiver operating characteristic plots to evaluate Guthrie, Wallac, and Isolab phenylalanine kit performance for newborn phenylketonuria screening. Clin Chem 1997; 43: 1838-1842
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Attia J. Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests. Aust Prescr 2003; 26: 111-113
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Gilja OH, Hausken T, Berstad A, Odegaard S. Measurements of organ volume by ultrasonography. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1999; 213: 247-259
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Matre K, Stokke EM, Martens D, Gilja OH. In vitro volume estimation of kidneys using three-dimensional ultrasonography and a position sensor. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 10: 65-73
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Chou CY, Hsu KF, Wang ST, Huang SC, Tzeng CC, Huang KE. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66: 89-93
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Kyei-Mensah A, Maconochie N, Zaidi J, Pittrof R, Campbell S, Tan SL. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound: reproducibility of ovarian and endometrial volume measurements. Fertil Steril 1996; 66: 718-722
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Riccabona M, Nelson TR, Pretorius DH. Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 429-434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Wong JB, Gerscovich EO, Cronan MS, Seibert JA. Accuracy and precision of in vitro volumetric measurements by three-dimensional sonography. Invest Radiol 1996; 31: 26-29
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Brett S, Bee N, Wallace WH, Rajkhowa M, Kelsey TW. Individual ovarian volumes obtained from 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional ultrasound lack precision. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18: 348-351
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Emamian SA, Nielsen MB, Pedersen JF. Intraobserver and interobserver variations in sonographic measurements of kidney size in adult volunteers. A comparison of linear measurements and volumetric estimates. Acta Radiol 1995; 36: 399-401
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Iams JD. Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 402-412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Sanchez-Ramos L, Delke I, Zamora J, Kaunitz AM. Fetal fibronectin as a short-term predictor of preterm birth in symptomatic patients: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 631-640
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar