J Knee Surg 2013; 26(06): 429-434
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1343615
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reliability of Templating with Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Kimona Issa
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Aiman Rifai
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St Joseph's Hospital, Seton Hall University, Paterson, New Jersey
,
Mike S. McGrath
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St Joseph's Hospital, Seton Hall University, Paterson, New Jersey
,
John J. Callaghan
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St Joseph's Hospital, Seton Hall University, Paterson, New Jersey
,
Craig Wright
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St Joseph's Hospital, Seton Hall University, Paterson, New Jersey
,
Arthur L. Malkani
3   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Vincent K. McInerney
2   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St Joseph's Hospital, Seton Hall University, Paterson, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 February 2013

26 February 2013

Publication Date:
10 April 2013 (online)

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography–based patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) may allow for reliable alignment and fewer outliers when compared with conventionally instrumented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, some authors have suggested that frequent intraoperative surgeon-directed changes may still be required. This study evaluated the accuracy of PSI to predict component sizing and alignment during TKA. A total of 84 patients (89 knees) who underwent a TKA using a PSI system were evaluated. An MRI-based preoperative plan of every knee was provided and approved by the surgeons. This demonstrated the proposed prosthetic component alignment, as well as the femoral, tibial, and bearing insert component size and position. Intraoperative changes to these components were prospectively recorded and compared with the computerized preoperative plan. Major changes were defined as any changes in femoral or tibial resection, size, and position of the components. Minor changes were defined as any change in the size of the polyethylene bearing insert. The preoperative plan was able to correctly predict the size of the implanted tibial and femoral component in 93 and 95.5% of the cases, respectively. Thirteen major intraoperative changes were made. In one knee, the proposed femoral resection was not acceptable (because of the presence of significant amount of osteophytes) and was abandoned in favor of a manual extramedullary guide. In another patient, the proposed femoral and tibial components were upsized. In two other patients, the femoral components were downsized, in four patients, the tibial components were downsized, and in another patient, it was upsized. There were also 16 minor changes, which included 2-mm upsizing of the polyethylene liner in 13 knees and 4-mm upsizing in 3 knees. Surgical experience is necessary to recognize improper component size, incorrect surgical resection, or nonideal alignment when performing TKA using PSI. The authors believe that the design and manufacture of PSI combined with a comprehensive templating resulted in excellent intraoperative concordance of the preoperative plan at the default settings with minimal changes.

 
  • References

  • 1 Callaghan JJ, Wells CW, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (7) 1635-1639
  • 2 Gill GS, Joshi AB, Mills DM. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 210-215
  • 3 Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (388) 10-17
  • 4 Ranawat CS, Flynn Jr WF, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286) 94-102
  • 5 Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (4) 560-569
  • 6 Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 35-43
  • 7 Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (1) 57-63
  • 8 Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356) 111-118
  • 9 Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73 (5) 709-714
  • 10 Kennedy WR, White RP. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (221) 278-285
  • 11 Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59 (1) 77-79
  • 12 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
  • 13 Petersen TL, Engh GA. Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3 (1) 67-72
  • 14 Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (299) 153-156
  • 15 Bargren JH, Blaha JD, Freeman MA. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (173) 178-183
  • 16 Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (5) 682-687
  • 17 Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB , et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 26-34
  • 18 Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, Gulick BC, Lombardi Jr AV. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (1) 99-107
  • 19 Cheung KW, Chiu KH. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Hong Kong Med J 2009; 15 (5) 353-358
  • 20 Rosenberger RE, Hoser C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Hennerbichler A, Fink C. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16 (3) 249-257
  • 21 Ek ET, Dowsey MM, Tse LF , et al. Comparison of functional and radiological outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a matched-control retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008; 16 (2) 192-196
  • 22 Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (1) 2-9
  • 23 Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (5) 618-626
  • 24 Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Tsumura N , et al. Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (7) 1107-1112
  • 25 Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Sandoval-Garcia MA, Noriega-Fernandez A. Computer assistance increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty with articular deformity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (5) 1237-1241
  • 26 Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (4) 471-476
  • 27 Maculé-Beneyto F, Hernández-Vaquero D, Segur-Vilalta JM , et al. Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study. Int Orthop 2006; 30 (6) 536-540
  • 28 Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, Padhy D, Jeong WK, Han SB. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (3) 381-387
  • 29 Matsumoto T, Tsumura N, Kurosaka M , et al. Prosthetic alignment and sizing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2004; 28 (5) 282-285
  • 30 Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (7) 1054-1059
  • 31 Skowroński J, Bielecki M, Hermanowicz K, Skowroński R. The radiological outcomes of total knee arthroplasty using computer assisted navigation ORTHOPILOT. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2005; 70 (1) 5-8
  • 32 Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, Siston RA. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (9) 857-863
  • 33 Watters TS, Mather III RC, Browne JA, Berend KR, Lombardi Jr AV, Bolognesi MP. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2011; 20 (2) 112-116
  • 34 Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (6) 1571-1575
  • 35 Daniilidis K, Tibesku CO. Frontal plane alignment after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (1) 45-50
  • 36 Heyse TJ, Tibesku CO. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee 2012; (Nov) 7
  • 37 Mayer SW, Hug KT, Hansen BJ, Bolognesi MP. Total knee arthroplasty in osteopetrosis using patient-specific instrumentation. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (8) e1-e4
  • 38 Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson J, Peters CL. Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty required frequent surgeon-directed changes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (1) 169-174
  • 39 Healy WL, Della Valle CJ, Iorio R , et al. Complications of Total Knee Arthroplasty: Standardized List and Definitions of The Knee Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (1) 215-220