Controversies Surrounding Quality Measurement in Colon and Rectal Surgery

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Quality improvement in health care has become a major topic of discussion among health care providers, patients, insurance companies, and the government. National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), along with a multitude of other programs, exists in an attempt to create objective data that can be used to compare hospitals and providers against a national average. Studies have shown that despite good patient care and proper surgical technique, patients who undergo procedures such as colectomy have a higher incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and other morbidities. Therefore, hospitals with a large volume of colon and rectal surgery cases are routinely identified as “high outliers” in these quality improvement programs. Programs, such as NSQIP, may not be the best way to measure quality in specific subspecialties such as colon and rectal surgery.

• References

• 1 Russell MM. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: background and methodology. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2012; 23 (4) 141-145
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Rowell KS, Turrentine FE, Hutter MM, Khuri SF, Henderson WG. Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204 (6) 1293-1300
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Surgical Care Improvement Project website: http://www.jointcommission.org/surgical_care_improvement_project/ . Accessed June 20, 2013
  PubMed
• 4 Delaney CP. Quality improvement and efficiency of care: are acronyms really the way of the future?. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 2011; 22 (4) 192-196
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 National Association for Healthcare Quality website. http://www.nahq.org/ . Accessed June 30, 2013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 National Patient Safety Foundation website. http://www.npsf.org/ . Access June 30, 2013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 National Quality Forum website: http://www.qualityforum.org/Home.aspx . Access June 27, 2013
  PubMed
• 8 Consumers Advancing Patient Safety website: http://www.patientsafety.org/ . Accessed June 30, 2013
  PubMed
• 9 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website: http://www.ahrq.gov/index.html . Accessed June 30, 2013
  PubMed
• 10 University HealthSystems Consortium website: https://www.uhc.edu/1244.htm . Access June 29, 2013
  PubMed
• 11 Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg 2006; 244 (5) 758-763
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Regenbogen SE, Read TE, Roberts PL, Marcello PW, Schoetz DJ, Ricciardi R. Urinary tract infection after colon and rectal resections: more common than predicted by risk-adjustment models. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 213 (6) 784-792
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Schilling PL, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD. Prioritizing quality improvement in general surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207 (5) 698-704
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 James J. Health policy brief: pay-for-performance. Health Aff 2012; (October): 1-6
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Wick EC, Vogel JD, Church JM, Remzi F, Fazio VW. Surgical site infections in a “high outlier” institution: are colorectal surgeons to blame?. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52 (3) 374-379
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Raval MV, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM , et al. Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211 (6) 715-723
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J , et al; Principal Investigators of the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study. Ann Surg 2008; 248 (2) 329-336
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY , et al. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211 (6) 705-714
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA 2010; 303 (24) 2479-2485
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Tillman M, Wehbe-Janek H, Hodges B, Smythe WR, Papaconstantinou HT. Surgical care improvement project and surgical site infections: can integration in the surgical safety checklist improve quality performance and clinical outcomes?. J Surg Res 2013; 184 (1) 150-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hechenbleikner EM, Makary MA, Samarov DV , et al. Hospital readmission by method of data collection. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216 (6) 1150-1158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Lawson EH, Wang X, Cohen ME, Hall BL, Tanzman H, Ko CY. Morbidity and mortality after colorectal procedures: comparison of data from the American College of Surgeons case log system and the ACS NSQIP. J Am Coll Surg 2011; 212 (6) 1077-1085
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Steinberg SM, Popa MR, Michalek JA, Bethel MJ, Ellison EC. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement. Surgery 2008; 144 (4) 662-667 , discussion 662–667
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Reinke CE, Showalter S, Mahmoud NN, Kelz RR. Comparison of anastomotic leak rate after colorectal surgery using different databases. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (5) 638-644
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Anderson J. ACS strives to help rural areas adopt NSQIP. ACS Surgery News 2012; 8 (5) 1 , 8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Audet AM, Doty MM, Shamasdin J, Schoenbaum SC. Measure, learn and improve: physicians' involvement in quality improvement. Health Aff 2005; 24 (3) 843-853
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Harris G. More Doctors Giving Up Private Practices. New York Times. March 26, 2010:B1
  PubMedGoogle Scholar