Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(10): 857-862
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1367050
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Anatomical Research on the Subacromial Interval Following Implantation of Clavicle Hook Plates

Z. Deng
1   Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Orthopaedics, Wuhan, China
,
L. Cai
1   Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Orthopaedics, Wuhan, China
,
A. Ping
1   Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Orthopaedics, Wuhan, China
,
Q. Ai
1   Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Orthopaedics, Wuhan, China
,
Y. Wang
1   Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Orthopaedics, Wuhan, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 06 January 2014

Publication Date:
27 February 2014 (online)

Abstract

This article aimed to explore whether hook plate implantation significantly narrowed the subacromial space. 24 shoulder joints were implanted with clavicle hook plates. A Vernier caliper was used to measure the length and thickness of the acromion. In addition, the length and thickness of the hook of the plate were measured. The data from all measurements recorded were divided into 2 groups Group A, the length group: the length of acromion and the hook, and Group B, the thickness group: the thickness of acromion and the depth of hook. There are significant statistical differences when comparing between the subgroups within each group. The depth of the hook exceeds the thickness of the acromion (12.41±2.80 mm vs. 10.44±2.59 mm, respectively), the hook plate implantation significantly narrowed the subacromial space by 1.97±1.19 mm (p<0.01), and the length of the hook was shorter than that of the acromion by 9.75±3.64 mm (p<0.01). Our findings revealed that the hook plate with only 3 depths could not match the acromion satisfactorily and the hook plate implantation significantly narrowed the subacromial space. A hook plate with a variable depth, which can match better with patient’s anatomy, is worthy of further investigation in the future.

 
  • References

  • 1 Chandrasenan S, Badhe S, Cresswell T, De Beer J. The Clavicular Hook Plate: Consequences in Three Cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2007; 33: 557-559
  • 2 Chaudry SN, Waseem M. Clavicular hook plate: complications of retaining the implant. Injury 2006; 37: 665
  • 3 Di Francesco A, Zoccali C, Colafarina O, Pizzoferrato R, Flamini S. The use of hook plate in type III and V acromio-clavicular Rockwood dislocations: clinical and radiological midterm results and MRI evaluation in 42 patients. Injury 2012; 43: 147-152
  • 4 ElMaraghy AW, Devereaux MW, Ravichandiran K, Agur AM. Subacromial morphometric assessment of the clavicle hook plate. Injury 2010; 41: 613-619
  • 5 Fung M, Kato S, Barrance PJ, Elias JJ, McFarland EG, Nobuhara K, Chao EY. Scapular and clavicular kinematics during humeral elevation: a study with cadavers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001; 10: 278-285
  • 6 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2014 update. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
  • 7 Hyvonen P, Lantto V, Jalovaara P. Local pressures in the subacromial space. Int Orthop 2003; 27: 373-377
  • 8 Kashii M, Inui H, Yamamoto K. Surgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures using the clavicular hook plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 447: 158-164
  • 9 Klein SM, Badman BL, Keating CJ, Devinney DS, Frankle MA, Mighell MA. Results of surgical treatment for unstable distal clavicular fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19: 1049-1055
  • 10 Lee KW, Lee SK, Kim KJ, Kim YI, Kwon WC, Choy WS. Arthroscopic-assisted locking compression plate clavicular hook fixation for unstable fractures of the lateral end of the clavicle: a prospective study. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 839-845
  • 11 Lee YS, Lau MJ, Tseng YC, Chen WC, Kao HY, Wei JD. Comparison of the efficacy of hook plate versus tension band wire in the treatment of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 1401-1405
  • 12 Meda PV, Machani B, Sinopidis C, Braithwaite I, Brownson P, Frostick SP. Clavicular hook plate for lateral end fractures: – a prospective study. Injury 2006; 37: 277-283
  • 13 Michener LA, McClure PW, Karduna AR. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003; 18: 369-379
  • 14 Muramatsu K, Shigetomi M, Matsunaga T, Murata Y, Taguchi T. Use of the AO hook-plate for treatment of unstable fractures of the distal clavicle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2007; 127: 191-194
  • 15 Manufacture’s technique guide: Clavicular hook plate. Synthes-Stratec Medical. Switzerland
  • 16 Nicholson GP, Goodman DA, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. The acromion: morphologic condition and age-related changes. A study of 420 scapulas. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5: 1-11
  • 17 Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Shin SH, Gong HS. Treatment of distal clavicle fracture: a systematic review of treatment modalities in 425 fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 525-533
  • 18 Renger RJ, Roukema GR, Reurings JC, Raams PM, Font J, Verleisdonk EJ. The clavicle hook plate for Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23: 570-574
  • 19 Rolf O, Hann VWA, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2008; 128: 1153-1157
  • 20 Tan HL, Zhao JK, Qian C, Shi Y, Zhou Q. Clinical results of treatment using a clavicular hook plate versus a T-plate in neer type II distal clavicle fractures. Orthopedics 2012; 35: e1191-e1197
  • 21 Tiren D, van Bemmel AJ, Swank DJ, van der Linden FM. Hook plate fixation of acute displaced lateral clavicle fractures: mid-term results and a brief literature overview. J Orthop Surg Res 2012; 7: 2
  • 22 Umer M, Qadir I, Azam M. Subacromial impingement syndrome. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2012; 4: e18
  • 23 von Heideken J, Bostrom WH, Une-Larsson V, Ekelund A. Acute surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation type V with a hook plate: superiority to late reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 9-17
  • 24 Yanagisawa K, Hamada K, Gotoh M, Tokunaga T, Oshika Y, Tomisawa M, Lee YH, Handa A, Kijima H, Yamazaki H, Nakamura M, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N, Fukuda H. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in the subacromial bursa is increased in patients with impingement syndrome. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 448-455