Disadvantages and Advantages of Transtibial Technique for Creating the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Socket

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral socket techniques have distinct advantages and disadvantages when considering the following techniques: transtibial, anteromedial portal, outside-in, and outside-in retroconstruction. There is no one perfect technique and we have an incomplete understanding of anatomical, biomechanical, isometry, stability, and clinical outcomes. Our primary focus is transtibial technique for creating the ACL femoral socket. Advantages include less invasive, isometric graft placement, stable Lachman exam, and minimal graft impingement with the tunnel and notch. Disadvantages include nonanatomic vertical graft placement that can cause rotational instability and positive pivot shift, interference screw divergence, graft-tunnel length mismatch, femoral socket constraint, posterior cruciate ligament impingement, and a short, oblique tibial tunnel that may undermine the medial plateau in an attempt to achieve anatomic ACL reconstruction.

• References

• 1 Rue JP, Ghodadra N, Lewis PB, Bach Jr BR. Femoral and tibial tunnel position using a transtibial drilled anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (3) 246-249
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Schmieding R. Helping Surgeons Treat Their Patients Better: A History of Arthrex's Contribution to Arthroscopic Surgery. Arthrex; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 3 Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM. Definitive landmarks for reproducible tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (3) 275-288
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hwang MD, Piefer JW, Lubowitz JH. Anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (5) 728-734
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Lubowitz JH, Ahmad CS, Anderson K. All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (5) 717-727
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lubowitz JH. Anatomic ACL reconstruction produces greater graft length change during knee range-of-motion than transtibial technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (5) 1190-1195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA Football Team Physicians. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (6) 731-738
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (3) 629-634
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, Demontis A, Fabbriciani C. Clinical and radiographic results of ACL reconstruction: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study of outside-in versus inside-out reconstruction techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9 (2) 77-85
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Gill TJ, Steadman JR. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction the two-incision technique. Orthop Clin North Am 2002; 33 (4) 727-735 , vii
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T. Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (4) 439-444
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Garofalo R, Mouhsine E, Chambat P, Siegrist O. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the two-incision technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (6) 510-516
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Heming JF, Rand J, Steiner ME. Anatomical limitations of transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (10) 1708-1715
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Harner CD, Honkamp NJ, Ranawat AS. Anteromedial portal technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (1) 113-115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Gavriilidis I, Motsis EK, Pakos EE, Georgoulis AD, Mitsionis G, Xenakis TA. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Knee 2008; 15 (5) 364-367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Lopez-Vidriero E, Hugh Johnson D. Evolving concepts in tunnel placement. Sports Med Arthrosc 2009; 17 (4) 210-216
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Alentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Steinbacher G, Cugat R. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2010; 34 (5) 747-754
  Google Scholar
• 18 George MS. Femoral tunnel drilling from the anteromedial portal using the figure-4 position in ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (8) 674-677
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Mardani-Kivi M, Madadi F, Keyhani S, Karimi-Mobarake M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. Antero-medial portal vs. transtibial techniques for drilling femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring tendon: a cross-sectional study with 1-year follow-up. Med Sci Monit 2012; 18 (11) CR674-CR679
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Logan JS, Elliot RR, Wilson AJ. TransLateral ACL reconstruction: a technique for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (7) 1289-1292
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Zhang Q, Zhang S, Li R, Liu Y, Cao X. Comparison of two methods of femoral tunnel preparation in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Acta Cir Bras 2012; 27 (8) 572-576
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind MC. Increased risk of revision after anteromedial compared with transtibial drilling of the femoral tunnel during primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Register. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (1) 98-105
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (8) 1330-1337
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Wang H, Fleischli JE, Zheng NN. Transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes of knee joint kinematics during walking. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41 (8) 1847-1856
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Koutras G, Papadopoulos P, Terzidis IP, Gigis I, Pappas E. Short-term functional and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (8) 1904-1909
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Brown Jr CH, Spalding T, Robb C. Medial portal technique for single-bundle anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (2) 253-269
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Seo SS, Kim CW, Kim JG, Jin SY. Clinical results comparing transtibial technique and outside in technique in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Relat Res 2013; 25 (3) 133-140
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH. Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (9) 1566-1571
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Lubowitz JH. Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (1) 95-101
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Lubowitz JH. No-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the transtibial all-inside technique. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (8) e1-e11
  PubMedGoogle Scholar