Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung – Trends und Forschungsupdate 2014

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die steigende Relevanz der betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung innerhalb des Systems der Gesundheitsversorgung stützt sich auf gesamtgesellschaftliche Entwicklungen. Trotzdem findet sich noch eine erschreckend geringe konkrete Nutzung. Obwohl nahezu alle gesetzlichen Krankenkassen dieses Thema mit Vorrang auf der Agenda haben, wurden im Jahr 2012 nur 0,3 % der Betriebe und nur 2,1 % der Mitarbeiter durch diese Programme erreicht. Ein Blick auf den internationalen Forschungsstand soll aufzeigen, welche zukünftigen Forschungstrends dies ändern können.

Summary

Workplace health promotion – trends and research update 2014

The increasing relevance of workplace health promotion is based on overall socio-economic development. Nevertheless, it is surprisingly still less utilized. Although almost all the statutory health insurance companies handle this topic with priority, only 0,3% of the companies and 2,1% of employees participate in the workplace health programs offered by the health insurance companies. A short review of international research shows the future trends that could offer a reversal of this current state of affairs.

• Literatur

• 1 Allweiss P, Brown DR, Chosewood LC et al. Cancer prevention and worksite health promotion: time to join forces. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 11: E128-E128
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Almeida FA, Wall SS, You W et al. The association between worksite physical environment and employee nutrition, and physical activity behavior and weight Status. Int J Occup Environ Med 2014; 56: 779-784
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Aneni EC, Roberson LL, Maziak W et al. A systematic review of internet-based worksite wellness approaches for cardiovascular disease risk management: outcomes, challenges & opportunities. PloS one 2014; 9 e83594
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Breaux-Shropshire TL, Whitt L, Griffin RL et al. Characterizing workers participating in a worksite wellness health screening program using blood pressure control, self-monitoring, medication adherence, depression, and exercise. Workplace Health Saf 2014; 62: 292-300
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Bronfenbrenner U. Die Ökologie der menschlichen Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 1981
  Google Scholar
• 6 Cahalin LP, Myers J, Kaminsky L et al. Current trends in reducing cardiovascular risk factors in the United States: focus on worksite health and wellness. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 56: 476-483
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Cipriano Jr G, Neves LM T, Cipriano GF B et al. Cardiovascular disease prevention and implications for worksite health promotion programs in Brazil. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 56: 493-500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Coffeng J, Van Sluijs E, Hendriksen I et al. Physical activity and relaxation during and after work are independently associated with need for recovery. J Phys Act Health 2014; 10.1123/jpah.2012-0452
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 DeJoy DM, Dyal M-A, Padilla HM et al. National workplace health promotion surveys: the affordable care act and future surveys. Am J Health Prom 2014; 28: 142-145
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Després J-P, Alméras N, Gauvin L. Worksite health and wellness programs: Canadian achievements & prospects. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 56: 484-492
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Flannery K, Resnick B. Nursing assistants’ response to participation in the pilot worksite heart health improvement project (WHHIP): a qualitative study. J Community Health Nurs 2014; 31: 49-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Goetzel RZ, Tabrizi M, Henke RM et al. Estimating the return on investment from a health risk management program offered to small Colorado-based employers. J Occup Environ Med 2014; 56: 554-560
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Harris JR, Hannon PA, Beresford SA et al. Health promotion in smaller workplaces in the United States. Ann Rev Public Health 2014; 35: 327-342
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Herman PM, Szczurko O, Cooley K et al. A naturopathic approach to the prevention of cardiovascular disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of a pragmatic multi-worksite randomized clinical trial. J Occup Environ Medicine 2014; 56: 171
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Hsu Y. Evaluation of shift fatigue and physical health intervention in paper manufacturer of workers. J Occup Environ Med 2014; 71: A92-93
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Huber G. Evaluation gesundheitsorientierter Bewegungsprogramme. Waldenburg: Sport Consult; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 17 Huber G. Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung: Ein Update zu Konzepten, Tendenzen und Forschungsstand. B&G 2013; 29: 46-50
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Jensen JD, King AJ, Carcioppolo N et al. Comparing tailored and narrative worksite interventions at in-creasing colonoscopy adherence in adults 50–75: a randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med 2014; 104: 31-40
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kuehl KS, Elliot DL, Goldberg L et al. The safety and health improvement: enhancing law enforcement departments study: feasibility and findings. Front Public Health 2014; 2: 38
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lemon SC, Wang ML, Wedick NM et al. Weight gain prevention in the school worksite setting: Results of a multi-level cluster randomized trial. Prev Med 2014; 60: 41-47
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Masanotti G. The worksite as an asset for promoting health in Europe. Final results of the MoveEurope Campaign Igiene e sanita pubblica 2013; 70: 185-196
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 McCoy K, Stinson K, Scott K et al. Health promotion in small business: a systematic review of factors influencing adoption and effectiveness of worksite wellness programs. J Occup Environ Med 2014; 56: 579
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Merrill RM, Sloan A. Effectiveness of a health promotion program among employees in a western United States school district. J Occup Environ Med 2014; 56: 639-644
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Nelson CC, Wagner GR, Caban-Martinez AJ et al. Physical activity and body mass idex: the contribution of age and workplace characteristics. Am J Prev Med 2014; 46: S42-S51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Okamura T, Sugiyama D, Tanaka T et al. Worksite wellness for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Japan: the current delivery system and future directions. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2014; 56: 515-521
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Radler DR, Marcus AF, Griehs R et al. Improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors among overweight and obese employees participating in a university worksite wellness program. Health Prom Pract 2014; DOI: 10.1177/1524839914558515.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Richard L, Gauvin L, Raine K. Ecological models revisited: their uses and evolution in health promotion over two decades. Ann Rev Public Health 2011; 32: 307-326
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Spitzenverband GKV. Präventionsbericht 2012. Leistungen der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung: Primärprävention und betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung In Internet: http://www.mds-ev.de/media/pdf/MDS_Praeventionsbericht_2012.pdf Stand: 12.12.2014
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Van Berkel J, Boot CR, Proper KI et al. Effectiveness of a worksite mindfulness-based multi-component intervention on lifestyle behaviors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014; 11: 9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Watkins C, English G. Moving the worksite health promotion profession forward is the time right for requiring standards? A review of the literature. Health Prom Pract 2014; 16: 20-27
  PubMedGoogle Scholar