Nutzenpotenziale von betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Bedeutung betrieblicher Gesundheitsförderung hat in den letzten Jahren zugenommen. Das ist in erster Linie dem demografischen Wandel geschuldet: der immer älter werdenden Bevölkerung und der negativen Geburtenentwicklung. Der präventive Nutzen von Interventionen der betrieblichen Gesundheitsförderung im deutschsprachigen Raum ist bisher unzureichend aufgearbeitet. Hierfür wurde ein Review angefertigt. Speziell zur Prävention im unternehmerischen Umfeld konnten 15 Studien aus Australien, Großbritannien, Korea, USA, Dänemark und lediglich eine aus Deutschland identifiziert werden. Die bewegungsbezogenen Studien, die Erfolge im Return on Investment, der Reduzierung der Sitzzeiten, dem E-Learning und körperlichen Benefit erzielen konnten, stellen einen zusammenfassenden Überblick dar. Jetzt gilt es, einen Goldstandard zu entwickeln, der Beschäftigte erreicht, die Probleme haben, Bewegung umzusetzen.

Summary

Potential benefits of occupational health promotion

The importance of workplace health promotion has increased in the past years. This is mainly due to demographic changes; on the one hand because of the increasing aging structure and on the other because of the reduced birth development. In German-speaking countries, the preventive benefits of workplace health promotion interventions have so far not been developed sufficiently enough. Therefore, a review was established and it turned out that especially for the prevention at the entrepreneurial environment, 15 studies from Australia, Great-Britain, Korea, USA, and Denmark were identified, but only one from Germany. It shows that the motion-based studies, which were able to achieve success regarding return on investment, reduced sitting time, e-learning, and physical benefit only represent a small overview. For now it is important to develop a gold standard, which could reach employees who have problems to implement physical activity into their daily life.

• Literatur

• 1 Alkhajah T, Reeves M, Eakin E et al. Sit-stand workstations. A pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: 298-303
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Badura B. Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement. Was ist das, und wie lässt es sich erfolgreich praktizieren?. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 2001; 44: 780-787
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Blake H, Zhou D, Batt M et al. Five-year workplace wellness intervention in the NHS. Perspect Public Health 2013; 133: 262-271
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Bundesamt für Statistik. Arbeitsmarktindikatoren 2011. Neuchatel: BFS; 2011
  Google Scholar
• 5 Christensen J, Faber A, Ekner D et al. Diet, physical exercise and cognitive behavioral training as a combined workplace based intervention to reduce body weight and increase physical capacity in health care workers – a randomized controlled trial. BMS Public Health 2011; 671: 1-11
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Christensen J, Overgaard K, Carneiro I et al. Weight loss among female health care workers – a 1-year workplace based randomized controlled trial in the FINALE-health study. BMS Public Health 2012; 625: 1-10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Cousins MS, Liu Y. Cost saving for a preferred provider organization population with multi-condition disease management: evaluating program impact using predictive modeling with a control group. Dis Manag 2003; 6: 207-2017
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Europäische Kommision. Health and food. Special Eurobarometer 246. Brüssel: TNS Opinion & Social; 2006
  Google Scholar
• 9 Evans R, Fawole H, Sheriff S et al. Point of choice promots to reduce sitting time at work. A randomized trial Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: 293-297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Freak-Poli R, Wolfe R, Backholer K et al. Impact of a pedometer-based workplace health program on cardiovascular and diabetes risk profile. Prev Med 2011; 52: 162-171
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Freak-Poli R, Wolfe R, Brand M et al. 8-month postprogram cCompletion: change in risk factors for chronic disease amongst participants in a 4-month pedometer-based workplace health program. Obesity J 2013; 21: 360-368
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obesity 1992; 6: 397-415
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Hjarnoe L, Leppin A. Health promotion in the Danish maritime setting: challenges and possibilities for changing lifestyle behavior and health among seafarers. BMC Public Health 2013; 1165: 1-12
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Huber G. Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung – nur mit Evaluation langfristig erfolgreich. B&G 2010; 26: 223-227
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Hwang G, Jung H, Kim Y. Evaluation of an incentive-based obesity management program in a workplace. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2011; 17: 147-154
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Jans P, Proper K, Hildebrandt V. Sedentary behavior in Dutch workers. Differences between occupations and business sectors. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33: 450-454
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Katzmarzyk P, Church T, Craig L et al. Sitting time and mortality from alll causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Basic Sc 2009; 51: 998-1005
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Kuehl KS, Elliot DL, Goldberg L et al. Economic benefit of the PHLAME wellness programme on firefighter injury. Occup Med 2013; 63: 203-209
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lerner D, Rodday A, Cohen J et al. A systematic review of the evidence concerning the economic impact of employee- focused health promotion and wellness programs. Econ Impact Worker Health Prom 2013; 55: 209-222
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lissner L, Johansson S-E, Quist J et al. Social mapping of the obesity epidemic in Sweden. Int J Obes 2000; 24: 801
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS et al. Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167: 875-881
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Meyer M, Modde J, Glushanok I. Krankheitsbedingte Fehlzeiten in der deutschen Wirtschaft im Jahr 2013. In: Badura B, et al., Hrsg. Fehlzeiten-Report 2014. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014: 323-376
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 23 Morgan P, Collins C, Plotnikoff R et al. Efficacy of a workplace-based weight loss program for overweight male shift workers: The Workplace POWER (Preventing Obesity Without Eating like a Rabbit) randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2011; 52: 317-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Parry S, Straker L, Gilson N et al. Participatory workplace interventions can reduce sedentary time for office workers – a randomized controlled trial. PLOS One 2013; 8: 1-10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Pressler A, Knebel U, Esch S et al. An internet-delivered exercise intervention for workplace health promotion in overweight sedentary employees: A randomized trial. Prev Med 2010; 51: 234-239
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 27 Slesina W. Betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Gesundheitsblatt–Gesundheitsforschung–Gesundheitsschutz 2008; 51: 296-304
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Straker L, Abbott R, Heiden M et al. Sit-stand desks in call centres: Association of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior. Applied Ergonomics 2013; 44: 517-522
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Thorndike A, Healey E, Sonnenberg L. Participation and cardiovascular risk reduction in a voluntary worksite nutrition and physical activity program. NIH Public Access 2011; 52: 164-166
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and metaanalysis. Diabetologia 2012; 55: 2895-2905
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar