J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2015; 76(02): 122-128
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390403
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

To Preserve or Not to Preserve the Orbit in Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis

Camilo Reyes
1   Department of Otolaryngology, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
,
Eric Mason
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
3   Center for Skull Base Surgery, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
C. Arturo Solares
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
3   Center for Skull Base Surgery, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
Carrie Bush
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, United States
,
Ricardo Carrau
4   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 June 2014

21 July 2014

Publication Date:
06 November 2014 (online)

Abstract

Context The effect on survival of orbital evisceration on patients with paranasal sinus neoplasms has not been well established.

Objective To review systematically the available literature concerning survival in patients who undergo surgery for paranasal sinus neoplasm with and without preservation of the eye.

Data Source A retrospective meta-analysis of English and non-English articles using Medline and the Cochrane database.

Eligibility Criteria Studies analyzing 5-year survival rates in patients who had orbital evisceration compared with orbital preservation for the treatment of paranasal sinus neoplasms were included in the final analysis.

Data Extraction Independent review by two authors using predefined data fields.

Data Synthesis A meta-analysis of four articles involving 443 patients was performed using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects method.

Results Our analysis revealed a total effect size of 0.964 in favor of preservation of the eye; however, these results are not robust, having a true effect size anywhere from 0.785 to 1.142 with a 95% confidence interval.

Limitations Only retrospective observational studies were included because a prospective randomized study cannot be performed in this population.

Conclusion Our study supports the notion that in select patients preservation of the eye may yield a different outcome when compared with orbital evisceration.

 
  • References

  • 1 Haerle SK, Gullane PJ, Witterick IJ, Zweifel C, Gentili F. Sinonasal carcinomas: epidemiology, pathology, and management. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2013; 24 (1) 39-49
  • 2 Suarez C, Llorente JL, Fernandez De Leon R, Maseda E, Lopez A. Prognostic factors in sinonasal tumors involving the anterior skull base. Head Neck 2004; 26 (2) 136-144
  • 3 Sheskin DJ. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. 5th ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Taylor & Francis Group; 2011
  • 4 Stern SJ, Goepfert H, Clayman G, Byers R, Wolf P. Orbital preservation in maxillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 109 (1) 111-115
  • 5 Shah JP, Kraus DH, Bilsky MH, Gutin PH, Harrison LH, Strong EW. Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the anterior skull base. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123 (12) 1312-1317
  • 6 Nishino H, Ichimura K, Tanaka H , et al. Results of orbital preservation for advanced malignant maxillary sinus tumors. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (6) 1064-1069
  • 7 Essig GF, Newman SA, Levine PA. Sparing the eye in craniofacial surgery for superior nasal vault malignant neoplasms: analysis of benefit. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007; 9 (6) 406-411
  • 8 Rajapurkar M, Thankappan K, Sampathirao LMCS, Kuriakose MA, Iyer S. Oncologic and functional outcome of the preserved eye in malignant sinonasal tumors. Head Neck 2013; 35 (10) 1379-1384
  • 9 McCary WS, Levine PA, Cantrell RW. Preservation of the eye in the treatment of sinonasal malignant neoplasms with orbital involvement. A confirmation of the original treatise. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (6) 657-659
  • 10 Nazar G, Rodrigo JP, Llorente JL, Baragaño L, Suárez C. Prognostic factors of maxillary sinus malignancies. Am J Rhinol 2004; 18 (4) 233-238
  • 11 Howard DJ, Lund VJ, Wei WI. Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: a 25-year experience. Head Neck 2006; 28 (10) 867-873
  • 12 Kuo C-H, Gao K, Clifford A, Shannon K, Clark J. Orbital exenterations: an 18-year experience from a single head and neck unit. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81 (5) 326-330
  • 13 Tiwari R, van der Wal J, van der Waal I, Snow G. Studies of the anatomy and pathology of the orbit in carcinoma of the maxillary sinus and their impact on preservation of the eye in maxillectomy. Head Neck 1998; 20 (3) 193-196
  • 14 Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Ginsberg LE, Garden AS , et al. Intraarterial cisplatin with intravenous paclitaxel and ifosfamide as an organ-preservation approach in patients with paranasal sinus carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 98 (10) 2214-2223
  • 15 Som ML. Surgical management of carcinoma of the maxilla. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99 (4) 270-273
  • 16 Perry C, Levine PA, Williamson BR, Cantrell RW. Preservation of the eye in paranasal sinus cancer surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114 (6) 632-634
  • 17 Wu X, Tang P, Qi Y. Management of the orbital contents in radical surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus. Chin Med J (Engl) 1995; 108 (2) 123-125
  • 18 Iannetti G, Valentini V, Rinna C, Ventucci E, Marianetti TM. Ethmoido-orbital tumors: our experience. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16 (6) 1085-1091
  • 19 Lund VJ, Howard DJ, Wei WI, Cheesman AD. Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses—a 17-year experience. Head Neck 1998; 20 (2) 97-105
  • 20 Imola MJ, Schramm Jr VL. Orbital preservation in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy. Laryngoscope 2002; 112 (8 Pt 1) 1357-1365
  • 21 Carrau RL, Segas J, Nuss DW , et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the sinonasal tract invading the orbit. Laryngoscope 1999; 109 (2 Pt 1) 230-235