Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection using novel 2.6-mm articulating devices: an ex vivo comparative and in vivo feasibility study

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: The conventional procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically demanding. This study investigated the efficiency of novel articulating devices (maximum diameter 2.6 mm), which can be used with commercially available, standard endoscopes.

Patients and methods: In an ex vivo comparative study, eight endoscopists were divided into novices and experienced operators, and performed ESD using new devices and the conventional setup. An in vivo animal experiment was performed by two experts. Procedure times for incision and dissection were recorded, and unit times for circumferential length and area of specimens were calculated.

Results: All procedures were successfully completed with en bloc resection. In the ex vivo study, the unit procedure times for incision and dissection by novices were significantly shorter using the new system (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference for experienced endoscopists. Perforation occurred during one procedure in which the new system was used. The in vivo experiments were successfully completed without adverse events.

Conclusions: ESD using novel articulating devices was feasible. These devices were able to reduce the procedure time for novices.

• References

• 1 Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H et al. A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 560-563
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Kakushima N et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer using the tip of an electrosurgical snare (thin type). Dig Endosc 2004; 16: 34-38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 853-858
  Google Scholar
• 4 Fukami N. What we want for ESD is a second hand! Traction method. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 274-276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Wang Z, Phee SJ, Lomanto D et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot: an animal survival study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 690-694
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Thompson CC, Ryou M, Soper NJ et al. Evaluation of a manually driven, multitasking platform for complex endoluminal and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery applications (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 121-125
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Fuchs KH, Breithaupt W. Transgastric small bowel resection with the new multitasking platform EndoSAMURAI™ for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2281-2287
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Dallemagne B, Marescaux J. The ANUBIS™ project. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2010; 19: 257-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Nakadate R, Kenmotsu H, Nakamura S et al. 2.6 mm articulating endoscopic submucosal dissection device insertable into standard endoscope. Int J CARS 2014; 9: S181-S182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Sakurazawa N, Kato S, Miyashita M et al. An innovative technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer using a new spring device. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 929-933
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Akahoshi K, Okamoto R, Akahane H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal tumors using a grasping-type scissors forceps: a preliminary clinical study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 419-422
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Homma K, Otaki Y, Sugawara M et al. Efficacy of novel SB knife jr examined in a multicenter study on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 419-422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar