Rofo 2015; 187(08): 697-702
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399648
Interventional Radiology
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Complications in CT-Guided, Semi-Automatic Coaxial Core Biopsy of Potentially Malignant Pulmonary Lesions

Komplikationen bei CT gesteuerter, koaxialer Stanzbiopsie malignomverdächtiger Lungenherde in halbautomatischer Technik
R. Schulze
1   Department of Radiology, Klinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
,
G. Seebacher
2   Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Klinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
,
B. Enderes
2   Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Klinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
,
G. Kugler
2   Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Klinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
,
J. R. Fischer
3   Department of Oncology, Klinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
,
T. P. Graeter
2   Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Klinik Löwenstein, Löwenstein, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

08 January 2015

31 March 2015

Publication Date:
10 June 2015 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: Histological verification of pulmonary lesions is important to ensure correct treatment. Computed tomographic (CT) transthoracic core biopsy is a well-established procedure for this. Comparison of available studies is difficult though, as technical and patient characteristics vary. Using a standardized biopsy technique, we evaluated our results for CT-guided coaxial core biopsy in a semi-automatic technique.

Materials and Methods: Within 2 years, 664 consecutive transpulmonary biopsies were analyzed retrospectively. All interventions were performed using a 17/18G semi-automatic core biopsy system (4 to 8 specimens). The incidence of complications and technical and patient-dependent risk factors were evaluated.

Results: Comparing the histology with the final diagnosis, the sensitivity was 96.3 %, and the specificity was 100 %. 24 procedures were not diagnostic. In all others immunohistological staining was possible. The main complication was pneumothorax (PT, 21.7 %), with chest tube insertion in 6 % of the procedures (n = 40). Bleeding without therapeutic consequences was seen in 43 patients. There was no patient mortality. The rate of PT with chest tube insertion was 9.6 % in emphysema patients and 2.8 % without emphysema (p = 0.001). Smokers with emphysema had a 5 times higher risk of developing PT (p = 0.001). Correlation of tumor size or biopsy angle and the risk of PT was not significant. The risk of developing a PT was associated with an increasing intrapulmonary depth of the lesion (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: CT-guided, semiautomatic coaxial core biopsy of the lung is a safe diagnostic procedure. The rate of major complications is low, and the sensitivity and specificity of the procedure are high. Smokers with emphysema are at a significantly higher risk of developing pneumothorax and should be monitored accordingly.

Key points:

• Using an 18G core biopsy system with 6 specimens will allow immunohistological staining with high sensitivity and specificity.

• Smokers with emphysema are at a significantly higher risk of developing a pneumothorax.

Citation Format:

• Schulze R, Seebacher G, Enderes B. et al. Complications in CT-Guided, Semi-Automatic Coaxial Core Biopsy of Potentially Malignant Pulmonary Lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2015; 187: 697 – 702

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die histologische Sicherung eines malignomsuspekten Lungenherdbefundes ist die Grundvoraussetzung für eine adäquate Behandlung. Die computertomografische (CT), transthorakale Histologiesicherung ist dabei ein etabliertes Verfahren. Die Vergleichbarkeit der vorhandenen Studien ist aber schwierig, da sowohl technische Einflüsse als auch die Patientencharakteristika stark variieren. Unsere Ergebnisse nach CT-gesteuerter, koaxialer Stanzbiopsie in halbautomatischer Technik werden präsentiert.

Material und Methoden: 664 konsekutive Interventionen in einem 2-Jahres-Zeitraum wurden retrospektiv analysiert. Alle Eingriffe wurden mit einer halbautomatischen 17/18G Koaxialnadel durchgeführt, dabei 4 – 8 Proben entnommen. Komplikationsraten und der Einfluss technischer wie patientenabhängiger Risikofaktoren wurden analysiert.

Ergebnisse: Bei Vergleich der histologischen Ergebnisse mit der endgültigen Diagnose lag die Sensitivität bei 96,3 %, die Spezifität bei 100 %. 24 Untersuchungen waren nicht diagnostisch. In allen anderen Fällen wurde ausreichend Gewebe für eine immunhistologische Differenzierung gewonnen. Bei 21,7 % der Patienten (n = 144) zeigte sich ein Pneumothorax (PT), der in 6 % drainiert werden musste (n = 40). Bei 43 Patienten zeigte sich eine nicht interventionsbedürftige, selbstlimitierende Blutung. Die Letalität lag bei 0 %. Die drainagepflichtige PT-Rate bei Emphysempatienten betrug 9,6 %, ohne Empatienten 2,8 % (p = 0,001). Die PT-Rate bei Rauchern mit Emphysem war 5fach erhöht (p = 0,001). Punktionswinkel und die Größe des Lungenherdes zeigten keine Korrelation mit der PT Inzidenz. Das PT-Risiko korrelierte mit zunehmender Länge der intrapulmonalen Punktionsstrecke (p = 0,001).

Schlussfolgerung: Die CT-gesteuerte, koaxiale Punktion von Lungenherden in halbautomatischer Technik ist ein sicheres diagnostisches Verfahren. Die Rate an therapierelevanten Komplikationen ist niedrig, die Sensitivität und Spezifität hoch. Patienten mit Emphysem und Raucheranamnese haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Pneumothoraxrisiko und sollten entsprechend überwacht werden.

Deutscher Artikel/German Article

 
  • References

  • 1 Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT et al. Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest 2004; 126: 748-754
  • 2 Nour-Eldin NE, Alsubhi M, Naguib NN et al. Risk factor analysis of pulmonary hemorrhage complicating CT-guided lung biopsy in coaxial and non-coaxial core biopsy techniques in 650 patients. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 1945-1952
  • 3 Hsia DW, Jensen KW, Curran-Everett D et al. Diagnosis of lung nodules with peripheral/radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2012; 19: 5-11
  • 4 Linden PA, D'Amico TA, Perry Y et al. Quantifying the safety benefits of wedge resection: a society of thoracic surgery database propensity-matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 98: 1705-1712
  • 5 Leyden OO. Ueber infectiöse Pneumonie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1883; 9: 52-53
  • 6 Haaga JR, Alfidi RJ. Precise biopsy localization by computed tomography. Radiology 1976; 118: 603-607
  • 7 Manhire AR, Richardson CM, Gleeson FV. Lung biopsy guidelines – for the obedience of fools and guidance of wise men. Thorax 2003; 58: 913-914
  • 8 Schlolaut KH, Lackner K, von Uexküll-Güldenband V et al. Results and complications of CT-guided puncture biopsies with a wide-lumen puncture needle. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1987; 147: 25-32
  • 9 Keulers P, Adam G, Günther RW. Fine needle punch biopsy of the lung. Results and complications. Radiologe 1994; 34: 576-580
  • 10 Swerdlow DR, Thaete FL. CT-guided core biopsy of difficult lesions: a modified coaxial approach. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 195-196
  • 11 Stern EJ, Frank MS. CT of the lung in patients with pulmonary emphysema: diagnosis, quantification, and correlation with pathologic and physiologic findings. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 791-798
  • 12 Manhire A, Charig M, Celland C et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax 2003; 58: 920-936
  • 13 Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 21: 969-975
  • 14 Wutke R, Schmid A, Fellner F et al. CT-guided percutaneous core biopsy: Effective accuracy, diagnostic utility and effective costs. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 1025-1033
  • 15 Sox HC. Better Evidence about Screening for Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2011; 365: 455-457
  • 16 Schreiber G, McCrory DC. Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence. Chest 2003; 123: 115S-128S
  • 17 Choi CM, Um SW, Yoo CG et al. Incidence and risk factors of delayed pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung. Chest 2004; 126: 1516-1521
  • 18 Takeshita J, Masago K, Kato R et al. CT-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsies of Pulmonary Lesions: A Single-Center Experience With 750 Biopsies in Japan. Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204: 29-34
  • 19 Ishida M, Suzuki M, Furumoto A et al. Transbronchial Biopsy Using Endobronchial. Ultrasonography with a Guide Sheath Increased the Diagnostic Yield of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. Intern Med 2012; 51: 455-460
  • 20 Varela-Lema L, Fernández-Villar A, Ruano-Ravina A. Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review. Eur Respir J 2009; 33: 1156-1164
  • 21 Albanna AS, Kasymjanova G, Robitaille C et al. Comparison of the yield of different diagnostic procedures for cellular differentiation and genetic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9: 1120-1125
  • 22 Rotte KH. CT-assisted needle biopsy in pulmonary and mediastinal space-occupying lesions. The effect of spiral CT and various biopsy needles on results. Akt Radiol 1995; 5: 136-139
  • 23 Williams JL, Hathaway CA, Kloster KL et al. Low power, type II errors, and other statistical problems in recent cardiovascular research. Am J Physiol 1997; 273: 487-493
  • 24 Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G et al. CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 2003; 229: 475-481
  • 25 Ko JP, Shepard JO, Drucker EA et al. Factors influencing pneumothorax rate at lung biopsy: are dwell time and angle of pleural puncture contributing factors?. Radiology 2001; 218: 491-496
  • 26 Dennie CJ, Matzinger FR, Marriner JR et al. Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of the Lung: Results of Early Discharge in 506 Outpatients. Radiology 2001; 219: 247-251
  • 27 Kim JI, Park CM, Lee SM et al. Rapid needle-out patient-rollover approach after cone beam CT-guided lung biopsy: effect on pneumothorax rate in 1191 consecutive patients. Eur Radiol 2015; Epub ahead of print
  • 28 De Filippo M, Saba L, Silva M et al. CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary nodules: is pulmonary hemorrhage a complication or an advantage?. Diagnostic and interventional radiology 2014; 20: 421-425
  • 29 Wagner JM, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG et al. CT-guided lung biopsies: pleural blood patching reduces the rate of chest tube placement for postbiopsy pneumothorax. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 783-788
  • 30 Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S et al. Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Annals of Internal Medicine 2011; 155: 137-144