Human Embryo Cryopreservation—Methods, Timing, and other Considerations for Optimizing an Embryo Cryopreservation Program

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The contribution of embryo cryopreservation to the birth rate per in vitro fertilization cycle has escalated from a rare subsidy to a vital tool that is called upon to augment the cycle outcome. Embryology laboratories must identify the embryo stage, quality criteria and methodology that will optimize their ability to preserve each embryo's reproductive potential. This chapter reviews the principles of cryopreservation, outcomes based on embryo stage and cryopreservation method and benchmarks that may be employed by the laboratory to measure the performance of their embryo cryopreservation program.

• References

• 1 Ahlström A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (5) 1199-1209
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ahlström A, Westin C, Reismer E, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (12) 3289-3296
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Racowsky C, Combelles CM, Nureddin A , et al. Day 3 and day 5 morphological predictors of embryo viability. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 6 (3) 323-331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (6) 1155-1158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Braude P. IVF results: optimize not maximize. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194 (2) 322-331
  Google Scholar
• 6 Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (1) 3-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Reynolds MA, Schieve LA. Trends in embryo transfer practices and multiple gestation for IVF procedures in the USA, 1996–2002. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (3) 694-700
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Gerris J, De Neubourg D, De Sutter P, Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M. Cryopreservation as a tool to reduce multiple birth. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7 (3) 286-294
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Schnorr JA, Doviak MJ, Muasher SJ, Jones Jr HW. Impact of a cryopreservation program on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 (1) 147-151
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Härkki P, Vuoristo P, Hyden-Granskog C. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2001; 16 (6) 1140-1144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Bhattacharya S, Kamath MS. Reducing multiple births in assisted reproduction technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28 (2) 191-199
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Griesinger G, von Otte S, Schroer A , et al. Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (5) 1348-1352
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Queenan Jr JT. Embryo freezing to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 169 (1–2) 79-83
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Pattinson HA, Hignett M, Dunphy BC, Fleetham JA. Outcome of thaw embryo transfer after cryopreservation of all embryos in patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 1994; 62 (6) 1192-1196
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Oktay K, Buyuk E, Davis O, Yermakova I, Veeck L, Rosenwaks Z. Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (1) 90-95
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Fuller B, Paynter S. Fundamentals of cryobiology in reproductive medicine. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9 (6) 680-691
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Leibo SP, Pool TB. The principal variables of cryopreservation: solutions, temperatures, and rate changes. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (2) 269-276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Nagy ZP, Vajta G, Chang C-C, Kort H. The human embryo: vitrification. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, , eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK: Informa; 2009: 275-287
  Google Scholar
• 19 Arav A, Zeron Y, Leslie SB, Behboodi E, Anderson GB, Crowe JH. Phase transition temperature and chilling sensitivity of bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 1996; 33 (6) 589-599
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Leibo SP, Martino A, Kobayashi S, Pollard JW. Stage-dependent sensitivity of oocytes and embryos to low temperatures. Anim Reprod Sci 1996; 42: 45-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ghetler Y, Yavin S, Shalgi R, Arav A. The effect of chilling on membrane lipid phase transition in human oocytes and zygotes. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (12) 3385-3389
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Songsasen N, Yu IJ, Ratterree MS, VandeVoort CA, Leibo SP. Effect of chilling on the organization of tubulin and chromosomes in rhesus monkey oocytes. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (4) 818-825
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Bianchi V, Coticchio G, Fava L, Flamigni C, Borini A. Meiotic spindle imaging in human oocytes frozen with a slow freezing procedure involving high sucrose concentration. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (4) 1078-1083
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Pedro PB, Yokoyama E, Zhu SE , et al. Permeability of mouse oocytes and embryos at various developmental stages to five cryoprotectants. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51 (2) 235-246
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Mazur P. Kinetics of water loss from cells at subzero temperatures and the likelihood of intracellular ice freezing. J Gen Physiol 1963; 47: 347-369
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Mazur P, Leibo SP, Chu EHY. A two-factor hypothesis of freezing injury. Evidence from Chinese hamster tissue-culture cells. Exp Cell Res 1972; 71 (2) 345-355
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Kleinhans FW, Mazur P. Comparison of actual vs. synthesized ternary phase diagrams for solutes of cryobiological interest. Cryobiology 2007; 54 (2) 212-222
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Rall WF, Meyer TK. Zona fracture damage and its avoidance during the cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. Theriogenology 1989; 31 (3) 683-692
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Gao D, Critser JK. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. ILAR J 2000; 41 (4) 187-196
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Rall WF. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos, gametes and ovarian tissue. Current issues and progress. In: Wolf DP, Zelinski-Wooten M, , eds. Assisted Fertilization and Nuclear Transfer in Mammals. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2001: 173-187
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 31 Bielanski A. A review of the risk of contamination of semen and embryos during cryopreservation and measures to limit cross-contamination during banking to prevent disease transmission in ET practices. Theriogenology 2012; 77 (3) 467-482
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Lindberg A, Ortman K, Alenius S, Seroconversion of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in dairy heifers after embryo transfer. In: Forsberg M, Greve T, Gustafsson H, Katila T, Kindahl H, Ropstad E. , eds. 14th International Congress on Animal Reproduction, Stockholm, Sweden; 2000: 250
  Google Scholar
• 33 Drew TW, Sandvik T, Wakeley P, Jones T, Howard P. BVD virus genotype 2 detected in British cattle. Vet Rec 2002; 151 (18) 551-552
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Bielanski A, Nadin Davis S, Sapp T, Lutze-Wallace C. Viral contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 2000; 40: 110-116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau PC, Devenish J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology 2003; 46 (2) 146-152
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Shaw JM, Kola I, MacFarlane DR, Trounson AO. An association between chromosomal abnormalities in rapidly frozen 2-cell mouse embryos and the ice-forming properties of the cryoprotective solution. J Reprod Fertil 1991; 91 (1) 9-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Houghton FD, Barr KJ, Walter G , et al. Functional significance of gap junctional coupling in preimplantation development. Biol Reprod 2002; 66 (5) 1403-1412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Vincent C, Johnson MH. Cooling, cryoprotectants, and the cytoskeleton of the mammalian oocyte. Oxf Rev Reprod Biol 1992; 14: 73-100
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Ahn HJ, Sohn IP, Kwon HC, Jo DH, Park YD, Min CK. Characteristics of the cell membrane fluidity, actin fibers, and mitochondrial dysfunctions of frozen-thawed two-cell mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2002; 61 (4) 466-476
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Van Waesberghe L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Viability of partially damaged human embryos after cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (9) 2006-2010
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Rienzi L, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi F , et al. Laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres from cryopreserved embryos that were partially damaged. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (6) 1196-1201
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Karow Jr AM. Cryopreservation: pharmacological considerations. In: Karow Am, Abouna GJ, , Humphries eds. Organ Preservation for Transplantation. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1974: 86-107
  Google Scholar
• 43 Agca Y, Liu J, Peter AT, Critser ES, Critser JK. Effect of developmental stage on bovine oocyte plasma membrane water and cryoprotectant permeability characteristics. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 49 (4) 408-415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Kasai M, Edashige K. Movement of water and cryoprotectants in mouse oocytes and embryos at different stages: relevance to cryopreservation. In: Chian RC, Quinn P, , eds. Fertility Cryopreservation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010: 16-23
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 45 Sales AD, Lobo CH, Carvalho AA, Moura AA, Rodrigues APR. Structure, function, and localization of aquaporins: their possible implications on gamete cryopreservation. Genet Mol Res 2013; 12 (4) 6718-6732
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Xiong Y, Tan YJ, Xiong YM , et al. Expression of aquaporins in human embryos and potential role of AQP3 and AQP7 in preimplantation mouse embryo development. Cell Physiol Biochem 2013; 31 (4-5) 649-658
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Alpha Scientists In Reproductive Medicine. The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 25 (2) 146-167
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18 (5) 536-554
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Veeck Gosden LL, Berrios R, Bodine R, Clarke RM, Zaninovic N. The human embryo: slow freezing. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, , eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives, 3rd ed. London, UK: Informa; 2009: 275-287
  Google Scholar
• 50 Tucker MJ, Liebermann J. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User's Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London, UK: Informa; 2007
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 51 Mazur P. Equilibrium, quasi-equilibrium, and nonequilibrium freezing of mammalian embryos. Cell Biophys 1990; 17 (1) 53-92
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Schneider U. Cryobiological principles of embryo freezing. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986; Feb;3 (1) 3-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Testart J, Lassalle B, Belaisch-Allart J , et al. High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing. Fertil Steril 1986; 46 (2) 268-272
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Leibo SP. A one-step in situ dilution method for frozen-thawed bovine embryos. Cryo Lett 1983; 4: 387-400
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Fahy GM, MacFarlane DR, Angell CA, Meryman HT. Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology 1984; 21 (4) 407-426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Reed ML, Said A-H, Thompson DJ, Caperton CL. Large-volume vitrification of human biopsied and non-biopsied blastocysts: a simple, robust technique for cryopreservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Yavin S, Arav A. Measurement of essential physical properties of vitrification solutions. Theriogenology 2007; 67 (1) 81-89
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature 1983; 305 (5936) 707-709
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril 1985; 44 (5) 645-651
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Fahy GM, Rall WF. Vitrification: an overview. Tucker MJ, Liebermann J, , eds. Vitrification in Assisted Reproduction. A User's Manual and Trouble-Shooting Guide. London, UK: Informa; 2007
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 61 Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature 1985; 313 (6003) 573-575
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Rall WF. Factors affecting the survival of mouse embryos cryopreserved by vitrification. Cryobiology 1987; 24 (5) 387-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Kola I, Kirby C, Shaw J, Davey A, Trounson A. Vitrification of mouse oocytes results in aneuploid zygotes and malformed fetuses. Teratology 1988; 38 (5) 467-474
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Quinn P, Kerin JFP. Experience with the cryopreservation of human embryos using the mouse as a model to establish successful techniques. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1986; 3 (1) 40-45
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Kuzan FB, Quinn P. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos. In: Wolf DP, , ed. In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. A Manual of Basic Technique. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1988
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 66 Trounson A, Sjöblom P. Cleavage and development of human embryos in vitro after ultrarapid freezing and thawing. Fertil Steril 1988; 50 (2) 373-376
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Ali J, Shelton JN. Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 99 (2) 471-477
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Martino A, Songsasen N, Leibo SP. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod 1996; 54 (5) 1059-1069
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Kuwayama M, Hamano S, Nagai T. Vitrification of bovine blastocysts obtained by in vitro culture of oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96 (1) 187-193
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Kasai M, Komi JH, Takakamo A, Tsudera H, Sakurai T, Machida T. A simple method for mouse embryo cryopreservation in a low toxicity vitrification solution, without appreciable loss of viability. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 89 (1) 91-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (12) 3077-3079
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998; 13 (12) 3434-3440
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Arav A. Vitrification of oocyte and embryos. In: Lauria A, Gandolfi F, , eds. New Trends in Embryo Transfer. Cambridge, UK: Portland Press; 1992: 255-264
  Google Scholar
• 74 Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12 (6) 779-796
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 AbdelHafez F, Xu J, Goldberg J, Desai N. Vitrification in open and closed carriers at different cell stages: assessment of embryo survival, development, DNA integrity and stability during vapor phase storage for transport. BMC Biotechnol 2011; 11: 29
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Valbuena D, Póo ME, Aguilar-Gallardo C , et al. Comparison of Cryotip vs. Cryotop for mouse and human blastomere vitrification. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (1) 209-217
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Wong KM, Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (1) 19-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Edgar DH, Archer J, McBain J, Bourne H. Embryonic factors affecting outcome from single cryopreserved embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14 (6) 718-723
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Surrey E, Keller J, Stevens J, Gustofson R, Minjarez D, Schoolcraft W. Freeze-all: enhanced outcomes with cryopreservation at the blastocyst stage versus pronuclear stage using slow-freeze techniques. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21 (3) 411-417
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: which one is better?. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21 (3) 270-274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Loutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA , et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (1) 186-193
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 AbdelHafez FF, Desai N, Abou-Setta AM, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20 (2) 209-222
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (4) 1061-1066
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Jones Jr HW, Jones D, Kolm P. Cryopreservation: a simplified method of evaluation. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (3) 548-553
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Gardner DK, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 1998; 69 (1) 84-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Noyes N, Reh A, McCaffrey C, Tan O, Krey L. Impact of developmental stage at cryopreservation and transfer on clinical outcome of frozen embryo cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19 (Suppl. 03) 9-15
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril 2011; 96 (2) 344-348
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 Beier HM, Beckman JO. German Embryo Protection Act: Gesetz zum Schutz von Embryonen (Embryonenshutzgesetz-EschG). Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 605-606
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Germond M, Senn A. A law affecting medically assisted procreation is on the way in Switzerland. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16 (7) 341-343
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Fugger EF, Bustillo M, Katz LP, Dorfmann AD, Bender SD, Schulman JD. Embryonic development and pregnancy from fresh and cryopreserved sibling pronucleate human zygotes. Fertil Steril 1988; 50 (2) 273-278
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Horne G, Critchlow JD, Newman MC, Edozien L, Matson PL, Lieberman BA. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer programme. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (3) 542-547
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Senn A, Vozzi C, Chanson A, De Grandi P, Germond M. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage. Fertil Steril 2000; 74 (5) 946-952
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Queenan Jr JT, Veeck LL, Toner JP, Oehninger S, Muasher SJ. Cryopreservation of all prezygotes in patients at risk of severe hyperstimulation does not eliminate the syndrome, but the chances of pregnancy are excellent with subsequent frozen-thaw transfers. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (7) 1573-1576
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a “freeze-all” strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (6) 2029-2033 , 2033.e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Fortini D, Selman HA, Feliciani E. Elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: efficiency and safety. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (6) 1457-1460
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Damario MA, Hammitt DG, Session DR, Dumesic DA. Embryo cryopreservation at the pronuclear stage and efficient embryo use optimizes the chance for a liveborn infant from a single oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (4) 767-773
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 97 Marrs RP, Greene J, Stone BA. Potential factors affecting embryo survival and clinical outcome with cryopreserved pronuclear human embryos. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (6) 1766-1771 , discussion 1771–1772
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 98 Macas E, Imthurn B, Borsos M, Rosselli M, Maurer-Major E, Keller PJ. Impairment of the developmental potential of frozen-thawed human zygotes obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 1998; 69 (4) 630-635
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 99 Damario MA, Hammitt DG, Galanits TM, Session DR, Dumesic DA. Pronuclear stage cryopreservation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional IVF: implications for timing of the freeze. Fertil Steril 1999; 72 (6) 1049-1054
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 100 Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Time-course of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in human oocytes fertilized by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1994; 9 (9) 1743-1748
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 101 Beyer DA, Amari F, Diedrich K, Al Hasani S. Embryo survival after vitrification of 2 PN oocytes. Mid East Fertil Soc 2011; 16: 45-49
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 102 Al-Hasani S, Ozmen B, Koutlaki N, Schoepper B, Diedrich K, Schultze-Mosgau A. Three years of routine vitrification of human zygotes: is it still fair to advocate slow-rate freezing?. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14 (3) 288-293
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 103 Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11 (5) 608-614
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 104 Edgar DH, Bourne H, Speirs AL, McBain JC. A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (1) 175-179
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 105 Prades M, Golmard J-L, Schubert B, Poirot C. Embryo cryopreservation: proposal for a new indicator of efficiency. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 577-82.e1 , 2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 106 Hartshorne GM, Wick K, Elder K, Dyson H. Effect of cell number at freezing upon survival and viability of cleaving embryos generated from stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod 1990; 5 (7) 857-861
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 107 Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Mäkinen S, Karro H, Roos A, Tuuri T. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (9) 2368-2374
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 108 Solé M, Santaló J, Rodríguez I , et al. Correlation between embryological factors and pregnancy rate: development of an embryo score in a cryopreservation programme. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011; 28 (2) 129-136
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 109 Guerif F, Bidault R, Cadoret V, Couet ML, Lansac J, Royere D. Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (5) 1321-1326
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 110 Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, De Vos A , et al. Influence of cell loss after vitrification or slow-freezing on further in vitro development and implantation of human day 3 embryos. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (11) 2943-2949
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 111 Nagy ZP, Taylor T, Elliott T, Massey JB, Kort HI, Shapiro DB. Removal of lysed blastomeres from frozen-thawed embryos improves implantation and pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (6) 1606-1612
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 112 Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Iacobelli M , et al. Developmental potential of fully intact and partially damaged cryopreserved embryos after laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres and post-thaw culture selection. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (4) 888-894
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 113 Jericho H, Wilton L, Gook DA, Edgar DH. A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (3) 568-571
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 114 Edgar DH, Karani J, Gook DA. Increasing dehydration of human cleavage-stage embryos prior to slow cooling significantly increases cryosurvival. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 19 (4) 521-525
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 115 Wood MJ, Mollison J, Harrild K , et al. A pragmatic RCT of conventional versus increased concentration sucrose in freezing and thawing solutions for human embryos. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (8) 1987-1996
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 116 Fasano G, Fontenelle N, Vannin A-S , et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vitrification methods versus slow-freezing for cryopreservation of human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31 (2) 241-247
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 117 Cobo A, de los Santos MJ, Castellò D, Gámiz P, Campos P, Remohí J. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (5) 1138-46.e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 118 Desai N, Abdelhafez F, Bedaiwy MA, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Clinical pregnancy and live births after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20 (6) 808-813
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 119 Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B , et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (9) 1976-1982
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 120 Wilding MG, Capobianco C, Montanaro N , et al. Human cleavage-stage embryo vitrification is comparable to slow-rate cryopreservation in cycles of assisted reproduction. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27 (9–10) 549-554
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 121 Liu SY, Teng B, Fu J, Li X, Zheng Y, Sun XX. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (8) 2093-2100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 122 Guerif F, Lemseffer M, Bidault R , et al. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (5) 1051-1058
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 123 Ryan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 2007; 88 (2) 354-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 124 Marsh CA, Farr SL, Chang J , et al. Trends and factors associated with the Day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001–2009. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (8) 2325-2331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 125 Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocysts. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, , eds. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics Beyond. Carnforth, UK: Parthenon Press; 1999: 378-388
  Google Scholar
• 126 Van Landuyt L, Stoop D, Verheyen G , et al. Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policy. Hum Reprod 2011; 26 (3) 527-534
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 127 Goto S, Kadowaki T, Tanaka S, Hashimoto H, Kokeguchi S, Shiotani M. Prediction of pregnancy rate by blastocyst morphological score and age, based on 1,488 single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (3) 948-952
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 128 Honnma H, Baba T, Sasaki M , et al. Trophectoderm morphology significantly affects the rates of ongoing pregnancy and miscarriage in frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (2) 361-367
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 129 Van den Abbeel E, Camus M, Verheyen G, Van Waesberghe L, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Slow controlled-rate freezing of sequentially cultured human blastocysts: an evaluation of two freezing strategies. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (10) 2939-2945
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 130 Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (1) 20-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 131 Liebermann J. Vitrification: a simple and successful method for cryostorage of human blastocysts. In: Wolkers WF, Oldenhof H, , eds. Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. New York, NY: Springer; 2015: 305-319
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 132 Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Hennessy S, James AN, Yauger BJ, Larsen FW. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (6) 2138-2143
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 133 Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (12) 3246-3252
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 134 Hiraoka K, Hiraoka K, Kinutani M, Kinutani K. Blastocoele collapse by micropipetting prior to vitrification gives excellent survival and pregnancy outcomes for human day 5 and 6 expanded blastocysts. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (12) 2884-2888
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 135 Cohen J, Simons RF, Edwards RG, Fehilly CB, Fishel SB. Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1985; 2 (2) 59-64
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 136 Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?. Hum Reprod Update 1997; 3 (4) 367-382
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 137 Ménézo YJR. Blastocyst freezing. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115 (Suppl. 01) S12-S15
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 138 Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki AA. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (4) 697-699
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 139 Veeck LL, Bodine R, Clarke RN , et al. High pregnancy rates can be achieved after freezing and thawing human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (5) 1418-1427
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 140 Richter KS, Shipley SK, McVearry I, Tucker MJ, Widra EA. Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos. Fertil Steril 2006; 86 (4) 862-866
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 141 Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Restrepo H, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (2) 389-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 142 Yokota Y, Sato S, Yokota M, Yokota H, Araki Y. Birth of a healthy baby following vitrification of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 2001; 75 (5) 1027-1029
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 143 Sansinena M, Santos MV, Zaritzky N, Chirife J. Numerical simulation of cooling rates in vitrification systems used for oocyte cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2011; 63 (1) 32-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 144 Roy TK, Bradley CK, Bowman MC, McArthur SJ. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers. Fertil Steril 2014; 101 (5) 1294-1301
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 145 Hashimoto S, Amo A, Hama S, Ito K, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (6) 1528-1535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 146 Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T , et al. Vitrification of human blastocysts using CryoLoops: clinical outcome of 223 cycles. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (2) 384-391
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 147 Li Z, Wang YA, Ledger W, Edgar DH, Sullivan EA. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod 2014; 29 (12) 2794-2801
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 148 Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (2) 368-77.e1 , 9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 149 Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time?. Hum Reprod 2013; 28 (1) 6-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 150 Cohen J, Alikani M. The time has come to radically rethink assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online 2013; 27 (4) 323-324
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 151 Barnhart KT. Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization?. Fertil Steril 2014; 102 (1) 1-2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 152 Rama Raju GA, Haranath GB, Krishna KM, Prakash GJ, Madan K. Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified protocol for better pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online 2005; 11 (4) 434-437
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar