Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31(05): 523-531
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1567814
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Comparison of Two Kinds of Lasers in the Treatment of Acne Scars

Markus Reinholz
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Hannah Schwaiger
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Markus V. Heppt
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
J. Poetschke
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
J. Tietze
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Andreas Epple
2   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany
,
T. Ruzicka
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
P. Kaudewitz
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
,
Gerd G. Gauglitz
1   Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 November 2015 (online)

Abstract

Acne scars are common and stigmatizing for the affected patients. Besides surgery, chemical peels, microdermabrasion, and microneedling, the treatment with fractional laser is a standard therapy. The results of reducing acne scars treated either with a fractional Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet [Er:Y3Al5O1]) or a carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser at different wavelengths were compared and evaluated in the pilot study presented here. Fourteen patients with severe scars on both cheeks were treated four times in a random split-face approach: on one side with Er:YAG laser and on the contralateral side with CO2 laser following a standardized protocol. Therapeutic success was evaluated through the use of a high-resolution, 3D small-field capture system (PRIMOS), digital photography, and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) questionnaire. The evaluation was performed by a blinded investigator. Treatment results displayed a higher efficacy of the fractional CO2 laser compared with the Er:YAG laser as displayed by digital photographs. Additionally, objective (high-resolution, 3D small-field capture; PRIMOS) and subjective (POSAS) measuring results correlated positively in certain qualities (color, stiffness, thickness, surface, overall opinion). Using a novel scientific approach, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of different fractional lasers on acne scars using a rater-blinded approach. Compared with an Er:YAG laser, better skin smoothening was achieved by fractional CO2 laser treatment.

 
  • References

  • 1 Gollnick HP, Zouboulis CC, Akamatsu H, Kurokawa I, Schulte A. Pathogenesis and pathogenesis related treatment of acne. J Dermatol 1991; 18 (9) 489-499
  • 2 Nast A, Dréno B, Bettoli V , et al; European Dermatology Forum. European evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26 (Suppl. 01) 1-29
  • 3 Ghodsi SZ, Orawa H, Zouboulis CC. Prevalence, severity, and severity risk factors of acne in high school pupils: a community-based study. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129 (9) 2136-2141
  • 4 Garg S, Baveja S. Combination therapy in the management of atrophic acne scars. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2014; 7 (1) 18-23
  • 5 Layton AM, Henderson CA, Cunliffe WJ. A clinical evaluation of acne scarring and its incidence. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19 (4) 303-308
  • 6 Fabbrocini G, Annunziata MC, D'Arco V , et al. Acne scars: pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatol Res Pract 2010; 2010: 893080
  • 7 Jacob CI, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Acne scarring: a classification system and review of treatment options. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001; 45 (1) 109-117
  • 8 Rivera AE. Acne scarring: a review and current treatment modalities. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59 (4) 659-676
  • 9 Al-Dhalimi M, Jaber A. Treatment of atrophic facial acne scars with fractional Er:Yag laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2015; 17 (4) 184-188
  • 10 Kim DH, Ryu HJ, Choi JE, Ahn HH, Kye YC, Seo SH. A comparison of the scar prevention effect between carbon dioxide fractional laser and pulsed dye laser in surgical scars. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40 (9) 973-978
  • 11 Laubach HJ, Tannous Z, Anderson RR, Manstein D. Skin responses to fractional photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38 (2) 142-149
  • 12 Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractional photothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopic patterns of thermal injury. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34 (5) 426-438
  • 13 Omi T, Numano K. The role of the CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser in dermatology. Laser Ther 2014; 23 (1) 49-60
  • 14 Riggs K, Keller M, Humphreys TR. Ablative laser resurfacing: high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25 (5) 462-473
  • 15 van Drooge AM, Vrijman C, van der Veen W, Wolkerstorfer A. A randomized controlled pilot study on ablative fractional CO2 laser for consecutive patients presenting with various scar types. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41 (3) 371-377
  • 16 Falder S, Browne A, Edgar D , et al. Core outcomes for adult burn survivors: a clinical overview. Burns 2009; 35 (5) 618-641
  • 17 Idriss N, Maibach HI. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview. Skin Res Technol 2009; 15 (1) 1-5
  • 18 van der Wal MB, Verhaegen PD, Middelkoop E, van Zuijlen PP. A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33 (2) e79-e87
  • 19 Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31 (25) 2055-2063