Dual-focus versus conventional magnification endoscopy for the diagnosis of superficial squamous neoplasms in the pharynx and esophagus: a randomized trial

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Conventional magnification narrow-band imaging (CM-NBI) endoscopy has demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for superficial squamous neoplasms in the pharynx and esophagus. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the newly developed dual-focus NBI (DF-NBI) compared with that of CM-NBI.

Patients and methods: We recruited patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the head and neck, or esophagus, or with a history of SCC. The primary endpoint of this prospective controlled non-inferiority trial was the sensitivity of DF-NBI and CM-NBI for detecting superficial carcinoma in the pharynx and esophagus. Secondary endpoints included other diagnostic values and the resolving power of each endoscope. Superficial carcinoma was defined as high grade dysplasia and SCC invading up to the submucosal layer.

Results: The study included 93 patients. A total of 28 superficial carcinomas were detected in the pharynx and esophagus. The sensitivities of DF-NBI and CM-NBI for superficial carcinoma were 82 % and 71 %, respectively. The lower limit of the 90 % confidence interval for the difference between the sensitivities exceeded the non-inferiority threshold. The specificity and overall accuracy of DF-NBI vs. CM-NBI were 93 % vs. 90 % and 91 % vs. 86 %, respectively (both non-significant differences). The maximum resolving power of a conventional magnification endoscope was significantly higher than a dual-focus endoscope (7.2 µm vs. 11.6 µm: P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The findings indicate the non-inferiority of DF-NBI versus CM-NBI in detecting superficial carcinoma in the pharynx and esophagus. DF-NBI appears to have a resolving power that, although significantly lower, is sufficient to achieve high diagnostic accuracy, comparable to that of CM-NBI.

University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN, No. 000007585).

• References

• 1 Slaughter DP, Southwick HW, Smejakal W. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer 1953; 6: 963-968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Ina H, Shibuya H, Ohashi I et al. The frequency of concomitant early esophageal cancer in male patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Screening results using Lugol dye endoscopy. Cancer 1994; 73: 2038-2041
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. NEJM 2003; 349: 2241-2252
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Johansen LV, Grau C, Overgaard J. Hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma—treatment results in 138 consecutively admitted patients. Acta Oncol 2000; 39: 529-536
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Goda K, Tajiri H, Kaise M et al. Flat and small squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus detected and diagnosed by endoscopy with narrow-band imaging system. Dig Endosc 2006; 18: 9-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Goda K, Tajiri H, Ikegami M et al. Clinical impact of narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy for ‘basal layer type squamous cell carcinoma’ in the esophagus. Dig Endosc 2011; 23: 75-78
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Nonaka S, Saito Y. Endoscopic diagnosis of pharyngeal carcinoma by NBI. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 347-351
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Shiozaki H, Tahara H, Kobayashi K et al. Endoscopic screening of early esophageal cancer with the Lugol dye method in patients with head and neck cancers. Cancer 1990; 15: 2068-2071
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Dubuc J, Legoux J, Winnock M et al. Endoscopic screening for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in high-risk patients: a prospective study conducted in 62 French endoscopy centers. Endoscopy 2006; 57: 690-695
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lee CT, Chang CY, Lee YC et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancers. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 613-619
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gono K, Yamazaki K, Doguchi N et al. Endoscopic observation of tissue by narrow band illumination. Opt Rev 2003; 10: 211-215
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Sano Y, Muto M, Tajiri H et al. Optical/digital chromoendoscopy using narrow-band imaging system. Dig Endosc 2005; 17: 43-S48
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Muto M, Nakane M, Katada C et al. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ at oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal mucosal sites. Cancer 2004; 101: 1375-1381
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Nonaka S, Saito Y, Oda I et al. Narrow-band imaging endoscopy with magnification is useful for detecting metachronous superficial pharyngeal cancer in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 264-249
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Muto M, Minashi K, Yano T et al. Early detection of superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region and esophagus by narrow band imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1566-1572
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Huang LY, Cui J, Wu CR et al. Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. Chin Med J 2009; 122: 776-780
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Yoshida T, Inoue H, Usui S et al. Narrow-band imaging system with magnifying endoscopy for superficial esophageal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 288-295
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Ishihara R, Inoue T, Uedo N et al. Significance of each narrow-band imaging finding in diagnosing squamous mucosal high-grade neoplasia of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 1410-1415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Yoshimura N, Goda K, Tajiri H et al. Diagnostic utility of narrow-band imaging endoscopy for pharyngeal superficial carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4999-5006
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Goda K, Dobashi A, Tajiri H. Perspectives on narrow-band imaging endoscopy for superficial squamous neoplasms of the orohypopharynx and esophagus. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 1-11
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Singh R, Jayanna M, Navadgi S et al. Narrow-band imaging with dual focus magnification in differentiating colorectal neoplasia. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 16-20
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Singh R, Shahzad MA, Tam W et al. Preliminary feasibility study using a novel narrow-band imaging system with dual focus magnification capability in Barrett’s esophagus: is the time ripe to abandon random biopsies?. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 151-156
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Wallace MB, Crook JE, Coe S et al. Accuracy of in vivo colorectal polyp discrimination by using dual-focus high-definition narrow-band imaging colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 1072-1087
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Osera S et al. Usefulness of narrow-band imaging with dual-focus magnification for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 844-850
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Takenaka R, Kawahara Y, Okada H et al. Narrow-band imaging provides reliable screening for esophageal malignancy in patients with head and neck cancers. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2942-2948
  Google Scholar
• 26 Muto M, Hironaka S, Nakane M et al. Association of multiple Lugol-voiding lesions with synchronous and metachronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 517-521
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Shimizu Y, Tukagoshi H, Fujita M et al. Metachronous squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus arising after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 190-194
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Urabe Y, Hiyama T, Tanaka S et al. Metachronous multiple esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and Lugol-voiding lesions after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 304-309
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Makuuchi H, Shimada H, Chino O et al. Multiple primary cancer in the esophagus and other organs [Japanese with English abstract]. Stomach Intestine 2003; 38: 317-330
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Japan Society of Head and Neck Cancer. General rules of clinical studies on head and neck cancer. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co Ltd; 2005
  Google Scholar
• 31 Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer. 10th English edn. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co Ltd; 2008
  Google Scholar
• 32 Non-inferiority trial considerations. Rothmann MD, Weins BL, Chan ISF, Kramer P. Design and Analysis of Non-Inferiority Trials. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis Group; 2012: 15-41
  Google Scholar
• 33 Santi EGR, Inoue H, Ikeda H et al. Microvascular caliber changes intramucosal and submucosally invasive esophageal cancer. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 585-588
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Shimizu Y, Omori T, Yokoyama A et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus with iodine staining: high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia turns pink within a few minutes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 546-550
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Ishihara R, Yamada T, Iishi H et al. Quantitative analysis of the color change after iodine staining for diagnosing esophageal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 213-218
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar