Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Predictive Clinical Factors and Pregnancy Outcomes

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to identify clinical factors predictive of appendicitis in pregnant women and associated obstetric outcomes.

Study Design We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis from 2007 to 2012. Rates and odds of appendicitis based on presenting signs and symptoms were estimated. We also estimated rates and odds of adverse obstetric outcomes among women with a diagnosis of appendicitis.

Results Of 171 pregnant women evaluated, 14 (8.2%) had pathology-confirmed appendicitis. White blood cell (WBC) count on admission was moderately predictive of appendicitis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.74). A WBC count > 18,000 made the diagnosis of appendicitis more than 10 times more likely (adjusted odds ratio, 10.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.67–43.1). Of 127 women with complete pregnancy follow-up, women with appendicitis had a higher rate of pregnancy loss < 20 weeks (2/13 [15.4%] vs. 3/104 [2.9%], p < 0.01) and < 24 weeks (3/13 [23.1%] vs. 4/104 [3.8%]) than those without appendicitis. Appendicitis diagnosed in the first trimester was associated with increased risk of pregnancy loss < 24 weeks.

Conclusion WBC count > 18,000 on admission is significantly associated with appendicitis in pregnant women undergoing evaluation for appendicitis. Appendicitis during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with previable pregnancy loss.

Note

The authors have no conflict of interest or financial disclosure to report. No financial support was received for this study.

• References

• 1 Brown JJ, Wilson C, Coleman S, Joypaul BV. Appendicitis in pregnancy: an ongoing diagnostic dilemma. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11 (2) 116-122
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Yilmaz HG, Akgun Y, Bac B, Celik Y. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy--risk factors associated with principal outcomes: a case control study. Int J Surg 2007; 5 (3) 192-197
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Abbasi N, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA. Management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnancy-population-based study of over 7000 cases. BJOG 2014; 121 (12) 1509-1514
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Abbasi N, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA. Evaluation of obstetrical and fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by acute appendicitis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290 (4) 661-667
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hiersch L, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, From A, Ben-Haroush A, Peled Y. The impact of pregnancy on the accuracy and delay in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014; 27 (13) 1357-1360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ito K, Ito H, Whang EE, Tavakkolizadeh A. Appendectomy in pregnancy: evaluation of the risks of a negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (2) 145-150
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM. Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205 (4) 534-540
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Wei PL, Keller JJ, Liang HH, Lin HC. Acute appendicitis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16 (6) 1204-1211
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Zhang Y, Zhao YY, Qiao J, Ye RH. Diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy and perinatal outcome in the late pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122 (5) 521-524
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Al-Mulhim AA. Acute appendicitis in pregnancy. A review of 52 cases. Int Surg 1996; 81 (3) 295-297
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Mourad J, Elliott JP, Erickson L, Lisboa L. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182 (5) 1027-1029
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Rapp EJ, Naim F, Kadivar K, Davarpanah A, Cornfeld D. Integrating MR imaging into the clinical workup of pregnant patients suspected of having appendicitis is associated with a lower negative laparotomy rate: single-institution study. Radiology 2013; 267 (1) 137-144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Long SS, Long C, Lai H, Macura KJ. Imaging strategies for right lower quadrant pain in pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (1) 4-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM. Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 2009; 250 (3) 749-757
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kastenberg ZJ, Hurley MP, Luan A , et al. Cost-effectiveness of preoperative imaging for appendicitis after indeterminate ultrasonography in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (4) 821-829
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Nelson DW, Causey MW, Porta CR , et al. Examining the relevance of the physician's clinical assessment and the reliance on computed tomography in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 2013; 205 (4) 452-456
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, Lee JH, Park JK, Moon HJ. Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2013; 79 (1) 101-106
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY , et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (17) 1596-1605
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar