CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2017; 05(04): 237-245
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1606618
Review Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Review of the Literature

Gabriele Pisanu
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
,
Federica Rosso
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
,
Corrado Bertolo
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
,
Federico Dettoni
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
,
Davide Blonna
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
,
Davide Edoardo Bonasia
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
,
Roberto Rossi
1   Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Study of Turin, Ao Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 October 2017 (online)

Abstract

Patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) can be associated with anterior knee pain, stiffness, and functional impairment. Some authors report that PFOA affects approximately 9% of patients older than 40 years with a greater prevalence in females. Etiology of PFOA is multifactorial and is related to the presence of abnormal stresses at the PF joint due to knee- and patient-related factors. The need for a joint preserving treatment by isolated replacement of the injured compartment of the knee led to the development of PF arthroplasty (PFA). When a correct PF replacement is performed, PFA preserves physiologic tibiofemoral joint, thus allowing patients for a rapid recovery with a high satisfaction. The outcomes for PFA are quite variable with a trend toward good to excellent results, mainly owing to the improvement in surgical techniques, patient selection, and implant design. The development of the second generation of PFA improved the outcomes, which is attributed to the different trochlear designs. Recently, encouraging results have been provided by the association of PFA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). In many studies, the main cause of PFA failure is progression of tibiofemoral OA. The aim of this brief review of literature is to summarize the clinical features, indications and contraindications, surgical techniques, complications, and outcomes of PFA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Duncan R, Peat G, Thomas E, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P. Does isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis matter?. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17 (09) 1151-1155
  • 2 Lüring C, Tingart M, Drescher W, Springorum HR, Kraft CN, Rath B. Therapy of isolated arthritis in the patellofemoral joint: are there evidence-based options? [Article in German]. Orthopade 2011; 40 (10) 902-906
  • 3 McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, Dieppe PA. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis 1992; 51 (07) 844-849
  • 4 Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (18) 1712-1720
  • 5 Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (08) 495-506
  • 6 Kobayashi S, Pappas E, Fransen M, Refshauge K, Simic M. The prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24 (10) 1697-1707
  • 7 Mills K, Hunter DJ. Patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis: an individualised pathomechanical approach to management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2014; 28 (01) 73-91
  • 8 Grelsamer RP, Stein DA. Patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (08) 1849-1860
  • 9 Cooper C, McAlindon T, Snow S. , et al. Mechanical and constitutional risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: differences between medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral disease. J Rheumatol 1994; 21 (02) 307-313
  • 10 Argenson JN, Guillaume JM, Aubaniac JM. Is there a place for patellofemoral arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995; (321) 162-167
  • 11 Oni JK, Hochfelder J, Dayan A. Isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2014; 72 (01) 97-103
  • 12 Culvenor AG, Cook JL, Collins NJ, Crossley KM. Is patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis an under-recognised outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A narrative literature review. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47 (02) 66-70
  • 13 Minkowitz RB, Bosco III JA. Patellofemoral arthritis. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67 (01) 30-38
  • 14 van Jonbergen HP, Poolman RW, van Kampen A. Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (02) 199-205
  • 15 Gupta RR, Zywiel MG, Leadbetter WB, Bonutti P, Mont MA. Scientific evidence for the use of modern patellofemoral arthroplasty. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010; 7 (01) 51-66
  • 16 Levitt RL. A long-term evaluation of patellar prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973; (97) 153-157
  • 17 Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM. Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (144) 98-102
  • 18 Ackroyd CE, Chir B. Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 7-13
  • 19 Senavongse W, Amis AA. The effects of articular, retinacular, or muscular deficiencies on patellofemoral joint stability: a biomechanical study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (04) 577-582
  • 20 Rauh MA, Parker RD. Patella. In: Miller MD, Thompson SR. , eds. DeLee & Drez's Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2009
  • 21 Lonner JH, Bloomfield MR. The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2013; 44 (03) 271-280 , vii
  • 22 Iwano T, Kurasawa H, Tokuyama H, Hoshikawa Y. Roentgenographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral osteoarthrosis. With special reference to its relationship to femorotibial osteoarthrosis and etiologic factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (252) 190-197
  • 23 Sabatini L, Schirò M, Atzori F, Ferrero G, Massè A. Patellofemoral Joint Arthroplasty: our experience in isolated patellofemoral and bicompartmental arthritic knees. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 9: 189-193
  • 24 Arciero RA, Toomey HE. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A three- to nine-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (236) 60-71
  • 25 Leadbetter WB, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Indications, contraindications, and pitfalls of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (Suppl. 04) 122-137
  • 26 Dejour DH. The patellofemoral joint and its historical roots: the Lyon School of Knee Surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (07) 1482-1494
  • 27 van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, Barnaart LF, van Kampen A. Long-term outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (07) 1066-1071
  • 28 Leadbetter WB, Ragland PS, Mont MA. The appropriate use of patellofemoral arthroplasty: an analysis of reported indications, contraindications, and failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 91-99
  • 29 Delanois RE, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD. , et al. Results of total knee replacement for isolated patellofemoral arthritis: when not to perform a patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2008; 39 (03) 381-388 , vii
  • 30 Vermeulen H, De Doncker E, Watillon M. The Mac Keever patellar prosthesis in femoro-patellar arthrosis [Article in French]. Acta Orthop Belg 1973; 39 (01) 79-90
  • 31 Borus T, Brilhault J, Confalonieri N, Johnson D, Thienpont E. Patellofemoral joint replacement, an evolving concept. Knee 2014; 21 (Suppl. 01) S47-S50
  • 32 Tauro B, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Shah NA. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty. A five- to ten-year prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83 (05) 696-701
  • 33 Lustig S. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100 (1, Suppl) S35-S43
  • 34 Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 2008; 39 (03) 347-354 , vi
  • 35 Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: pros, cons, and design considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 158-165
  • 36 Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Khefacha A. Long-term results with the first patellofemoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 47-54
  • 37 Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92 (01) 56-60
  • 38 Shakespeare D, Dikko B. A simple precise technique for making the anterior cut in patellofemoral resurfacing. Knee 2005; 12 (06) 454-455
  • 39 Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ. Computer-assisted patellofemoral arthroplasty: a mechanism for optimizing rotation. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21 (03) 420-427
  • 40 Newman J. Isolated patellofemoral replacement. In: Romagnoli S, Confalonieri N. , eds. Small Implants in the Knee Reconstruction. Italia: Springer-Verlag; 2013
  • 41 Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ. Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop 2010; 39 (10) 487-491
  • 42 van der List JP, Chawla H, Villa JC, Pearle AD. Why do patellofemoral arthroplasties fail today? A systematic review. Knee 2017; 24 (01) 2-8
  • 43 Amanatullah DF, Jamali AA. Patellar polyethylene spinout after low-contact stress, high-congruity, mobile-bearing patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (02) e272-e276
  • 44 Dy CJ, Franco N, Ma Y, Mazumdar M, McCarthy MM, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (11) 2174-2190
  • 45 Mulford JS, Eldridge JD, Porteous AJ, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. Revision of isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee replacement. Curr Orthop Pract 2009; 20 (04) 437-441
  • 46 Krajca-Radcliffe JB, Coker TP. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. A 2- to 18-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (330) 143-151
  • 47 Kooijman HJ, Driessen AP, van Horn JR. Long-term results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. A report of 56 arthroplasties with 17 years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (06) 836-840
  • 48 van Wagenberg JM, Speigner B, Gosens T, de Waal Malefijt J. Midterm clinical results of the Autocentric II patellofemoral prosthesis. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (06) 1603-1608
  • 49 Leadbetter WB, Kolisek FR, Levitt RL. , et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (06) 1597-1601
  • 50 Nicol SG, Loveridge JM, Weale AE, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH. Arthritis progression after patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee 2006; 13 (04) 290-295
  • 51 Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2010; 59: 67-84
  • 52 de Winter WE, Feith R, van Loon CJ. The Richards type II patellofemoral arthroplasty: 26 cases followed for 1–20 years. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (05) 487-490
  • 53 Registry Australian Oarthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement. Available at: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com . Accessed 2016
  • 54 Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JD, Joslin CC. The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (03) 310-315
  • 55 Starks I, Roberts S, White SH. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91 (12) 1579-1582
  • 56 Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Kolisek FR, Leadbetter WB. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: 7-year mean follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (03) 358-361
  • 57 Sisto DJ, Sarin VK. Custom patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (07) 1475-1480
  • 58 Butler JE, Shannon R. Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a custom-fit femoral prosthesis. Orthopedics 2009; 32 (02) 81
  • 59 Mohammed R, Jimulia T, Durve K, Bansal M, Green M, Learmonth D. Medium-term results of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 2008; 74 (04) 472-477
  • 60 Parvizi J, Stuart MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD. Total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (392) 147-152
  • 61 Laskin RS, van Steijn M. Total knee replacement for patients with patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367) 89-95
  • 62 Mont MA, Haas S, Mullick T, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (11) 1977-1981
  • 63 Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Booth Jr RE. Revision of a failed patellofemoral arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (11) 2337-2342
  • 64 van Jonbergen HP, Werkman DM, van Kampen A. Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: a matched case-control study of 13 patients. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (01) 62-66
  • 65 Leadbetter WB. Patellofemoral arthroplasty in the treatment of patellofemoral arthritis: rationale and outcomes in younger patients. Orthop Clin North Am 2008; 39 (03) 363-380 , vii
  • 66 Lonner JH. Modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty with robotic arm assistance. Am J Orthop 2009; 38 (2, Suppl) 28-31
  • 67 Argenson JN, Parratte S, Bertani A. , et al. The new arthritic patient and arthroplasty treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (Suppl. 05) 43-48
  • 68 Leffler J, Scheys L, Planté-Bordeneuve T. , et al. Joint kinematics following bi-compartmental knee replacement during daily life motor tasks. Gait Posture 2012; 36 (03) 454-460
  • 69 Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Cartier P. UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130 (10) 1227-1230
  • 70 Kamath AF, Levack A, John T, Thomas BS, Lonner JH. Minimum two-year outcomes of modular bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (01) 75-79
  • 71 Parratte S, Ollivier M, Lunebourg A, Abdel MP, Argenson JN. Long-term results of compartmental arthroplasties of the knee: Long term results of partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B (10, Suppl A) 9-15
  • 72 Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer R. Patellofemoral arthroplasty. 2-12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5 (01) 49-55
  • 73 Mertl P, Van FT, Bonhomme P, Vives P. Femoropatellar osteoarthritis treated by prosthesis. Retrospective study of 50 implants [Article in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1997; 83 (08) 712-718
  • 74 Arnbjörnsson AH, Ryd L. The use of isolated patellar prostheses in Sweden 1977-1986. Int Orthop 1998; 22 (03) 141-144
  • 75 De Cloedt P, Legaye J, Lokietek W. Femoro-patellar prosthesis. A retrospective study of 45 consecutive cases with a follow-up of 3-12 years [Article in French]. Acta Orthop Belg 1999; 65 (02) 170-175
  • 76 Smith AM, Peckett WR, Butler-Manuel PA, Venu KM, d'Arcy JC. Treatment of patello-femoral arthritis using the Lubinus patello-femoral arthroplasty: a retrospective review. Knee 2002; 9 (01) 27-30
  • 77 Board TN, Mahmood A, Ryan WG, Banks AJ. The Lubinus patellofemoral arthroplasty: a series of 17 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124 (05) 285-287
  • 78 Merchant AC. A modular prosthesis for patellofemoral arthroplasty: design and initial results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (436) 40-46
  • 79 Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440 (440) 50-53
  • 80 Jørgensen PS, Konradsen LA, Mati WB, Tørholm C. Treatment of patellofemoral arthritis with patello-femoral arthroplasties [Article in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger 2007; 169 (23) 2201-2204
  • 81 Gadeyne S, Besse JL, Galand-Desme S, Lerat JL, Moyen B. Results of self-centering patellofemoral prosthesis: a retrospective study of 57 implants [Article in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 2008; 94 (03) 228-240
  • 82 Charalambous CP, Abiddin Z, Mills SP, Rogers S, Sutton P, Parkinson R. The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93 (04) 484-489
  • 83 Hoogervorst P, de Jong RJ, Hannink G, van Kampen A. A 21% conversion rate to total knee arthroplasty of a first-generation patellofemoral prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Int Orthop 2015; 39 (09) 1857-1864
  • 84 Gao X, Xu ZJ, He RX, Yan SG, Wu LD. A preliminary report of patellofemoral arthroplasty in isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010; 123 (21) 3020-3023
  • 85 Sarda PK, Shetty A, Maheswaran SS. Medium term results of Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Indian J Orthop 2011; 45 (05) 439-444
  • 86 Beitzel K, Schöttle PB, Cotic M, Dharmesh V, Imhoff AB. Prospective clinical and radiological two-year results after patellofemoral arthroplasty using an implant with an asymmetric trochlea design. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (02) 332-339
  • 87 Yadav B, Shaw D, Radcliffe G, Dachepalli S, Kluge W. Mobile-bearing, congruent patellofemoral prosthesis: short-term results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2012; 20 (03) 348-352
  • 88 Davies AP. High early revision rate with the FPV patello-femoral unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 2013; 20 (06) 482-484
  • 89 Hofmann AA, McCandless JB, Shaeffer JF, Magee TH. Patellofemoral replacement: the third compartment. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (11, Suppl A) 124-128
  • 90 Morris MJ, Lombardi Jr AV, Berend KR, Hurst JM, Adams JB. Clinical results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (9, Suppl) 199-201
  • 91 Williams DP, Pandit HG, Athanasou NA, Murray DW, Gibbons CL. Early revisions of the Femoro-Patella Vialla joint replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (06) 793-797
  • 92 Al-Hadithy N, Patel R, Navadgi B, Deo S, Hollinghurst D, Satish V. Mid-term results of the FPV patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee 2014; 21 (01) 138-141
  • 93 Benazzo F, Rossi SM, Ghiara M. Partial knee arthroplasty: patellofemoral arthroplasty and combined unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty implants--general considerations and indications, technique and clinical experience. Knee 2014; 21 (Suppl. 01) S43-S46
  • 94 Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22 (10) 2554-2559
  • 95 Fink B, Schwenninger C. Arthroplasty of the Femoropatellar Joint-What Data are Available? [Article in German]. Z Orthop Unfall 2014; 152 (02) 182-187
  • 96 Hernigou P, Caton J. Design, operative technique and ten-year results of the Hermes™ patellofemoral arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 437-442
  • 97 Akhbari P, Malak T, Dawson-Bowling S, East D, Miles K, Butler-Manuel PA. The avon patellofemoral joint replacement: mid-term prospective results from an independent centre. Clin Orthop Surg 2015; 7 (02) 171-176
  • 98 Liow MH, Goh GS, Tay DK, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Obesity and the absence of trochlear dysplasia increase the risk of revision in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee 2016; 23 (02) 331-337