Current Concept in Adult Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Surgery

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries and brachial plexus injuries are relatively frequent. Significance of these injuries lies in the fact that the majority of patients with these types of injuries constitute working population. Since these injuries may create disability, they present substantial socioeconomic problem nowadays. This article will present current state-of-the-art achievements of minimal invasive brachial plexus and peripheral nerve surgery. It is considered that the age of the patient, the mechanism of the injury, and the associated vascular and soft-tissue injuries are factors that primarily influence the extent of recovery of the injured nerve. The majority of patients are treated using classical open surgical approach. However, new minimally invasive open and endoscopic approaches are being developed in recent years—endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel release, targeted minimally invasive approaches in brachial plexus surgery, endoscopic single-incision sural nerve harvesting, and there were even attempts to perform endoscopic brachial plexus surgery. The use of the commercially available nerve conduits for bridging short nerve gap has shown promising results. Multidisciplinary approach individually designed for every patient is of the utmost importance for the successful treatment of these injuries. In the future, integration of biology and nanotechnology may fabricate a new generation of nerve conduits that will allow nerve regeneration over longer nerve gaps and start new chapter in peripheral nerve surgery.

• References

• 1 Siemionow M, Brzezicki G. Chapter 8: Current techniques and concepts in peripheral nerve repair. Int Rev Neurobiol 2009; 87: 141-172
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kingham PJ, Terenghi G. Bioengineered nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation. J Anat 2006; 209 (04) 511-526
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Ducker TB, Kempe LG, Hayes GJ. The metabolic background for peripheral nerve surgery. J Neurosurg 1969; 30 (03) 270-280
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kim SM, Lee SK, Lee JH. Peripheral nerve regeneration using a three dimensionally cultured Schwann cell conduit. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18 (03) 475-488
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Perry VH, Brown MC, Gordon S. The macrophage response to central and peripheral nerve injury. A possible role for macrophages in regeneration. J Exp Med 1987; 165 (04) 1218-1223
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Terenghi G. Peripheral nerve regeneration and neurotrophic factors. J Anat 1999; 194 (Pt 1): 1-14
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Mitchell JR, Osterman AL. Physiology of nerve repair: a research update. Hand Clin 1991; 7 (03) 481-490
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kim DH, Kline DG. Kline & Hudson's Nerve Injuries Operative Results for Major Nerve Injuries, Entrapments and Tumors. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008
  Google Scholar
• 9 Millesi H. Factors affecting the outcome of peripheral nerve surgery. Microsurgery 2006; 26 (04) 295-302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Doi K, Otsuka K, Okamoto Y, Fujii H, Hattori Y, Baliarsing AS. Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography. J Neurosurg 2002; 96 (3, Suppl): 277-284
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Weber RV, Mackinnon SE. Bridging the neural gap. Clin Plast Surg 2005; 32 (04) 605-616 , viii
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Zhao Q, Dahlin LB, Kanje M, Lundborg G. Specificity of muscle reinnervation following repair of the transected sciatic nerve. A comparative study of different repair techniques in the rat. J Hand Surg [Br] 1992; 17 (03) 257-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Driscoll PJ, Glasby MA, Lawson GM. An in vivo study of peripheral nerves in continuity: biomechanical and physiological responses to elongation. J Orthop Res 2002; 20 (02) 370-375
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (03) 391-414
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Battiston B, Geuna S, Ferrero M, Tos P. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (04) 258-267
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Meek MF, Coert JH. US Food and Drug Administration /Conformit Europe- approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (04) 466-472
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Schlosshauer B, Dreesmann L, Schaller HE, Sinis N. Synthetic nerve guide implants in humans: a comprehensive survey. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (04) 740-747 , discussion 747–748
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Transfer of supinator motor branches to the posterior interosseous nerve in C7-T1 brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (01) 129-132
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bertelli JA, Tacca CP, Winkelmann Duarte EC, Ghizoni MF, Duarte H. Transfer of the pronator quadratus motor branch for wrist extension reconstruction in brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130 (06) 1269-1278
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Improved technique for harvesting the accessory nerve for transfer in brachial plexus injuries. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (04) (Suppl. 02) ONS-366-ONS-370 , discussion ONS-370
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hankins CL, Brown MG, Lopez RA, Lee AK, Dang J, Harper RD. A 12-year experience using the Brown two-portal endoscopic procedure of transverse carpal ligament release in 14,722 patients: defining a new paradigm in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) 1911-1921
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Chen AC, Wu MH, Chang CH, Cheng CY, Hsu KY. Single portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: modification of Menon's technique and data from 65 cases. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (01) 61-65
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Tsai TM, Chen IC, Majd ME, Lim BH. Cubital tunnel release with endoscopic assistance: results of a new technique. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24 (01) 21-29
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ahcan U, Zorman P. Endoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (08) 1171-1176
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Krishnan KG, Pinzer T, Schackert G. A novel endoscopic technique in treating single nerve entrapment syndromes with special attention to ulnar nerve transposition and tarsal tunnel release: clinical application. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01) (Suppl. 01) ONS89-ONS100 , discussion ONS89–ONS100
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Mullick T, Dellon AL. Results of decompression of four medial ankle tunnels in the treatment of tarsal tunnels syndrome. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24 (02) 119-126
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Mantovani G, Liverneaux P, Garcia Jr JC, Berner SH, Bednar MS, Mohr CJ. Endoscopic exploration and repair of brachial plexus with telerobotic manipulation: a cadaver trial. J Neurosurg 2011; 115 (03) 659-664
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Park SB, Cheshier S, Michaels D, Murovic JA, Kim DH. Endoscopic harvesting of the sural nerve graft: technical note. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (1, Suppl): E180 , discussion E180
  PubMedGoogle Scholar