Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2018; 31(01): 017-021
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608809
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Learning Curve Associated with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty

Nipun Sodhi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Anton Khlopas
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Nicolas S. Piuzzi
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Assem A. Sultan
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Robert C. Marchand
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ortho Rhode Island, Wakefield, Rhode Island
,
Arthur L. Malkani
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 September 2017

15 October 2017

Publication Date:
22 November 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Erratum to: The Learning Curve Associated with Robotic Total Knee ArthroplastyJ Knee Surg eFirst
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635082

Abstract

As with most new surgical technologies, there is an associated learning curve with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) before surgeons can expect ease of use to be similar to that of manual cases. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) assess robotic-assisted versus manual operative times of two joint reconstructive surgeons separately as well as (2) find an overall learning curve. A total of 240 robotic-assisted TKAs performed by two board-certified surgeons were analyzed. The cases were sequentially grouped into 20 cases and a learning curve was created based on mean operative times. For each surgeon, mean operative times for their first 20 and last 20 robotic-assisted cases were compared with 20 randomly selected manual cases performed by that surgeon as controls prior to the initiation of the robotic-assisted cases. Each of the surgeons first 20 robotic assisted, last 20 robotic assisted, and 20 controls were then combined to create 3 cohorts of 40 cases for analysis. Surgeon 1: First and last robotic cohort operative times were 81 and 70 minutes (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the first 20 robotic-assisted cases and manual cases were 81 versus 68 minutes (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the last 20 robotic-assisted cases and manual cases were 70 versus 68 minutes (p > 0.05). Surgeon 2: First and last robotic cohort operative times were 117 and 98 minutes (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the first 20 robotic-assisted cases and manual cases were 117 versus 95 (p < 0.05). Mean operative times for the last 20 robotic-cohort cases and manual cases were 98 versus 95 (p > 0.05). A similar trend occurred when the times of two surgeons were combined. The data from this study effectively create a learning curve for the use of robotic-assisted TKA. As both surgeons completed their total cases numbers within similar time frames, these data imply that within a few months, a board-certified orthopaedic joint arthroplasty surgeon should be able to adequately perform robotic TKA without adding any operative times.

Keywords

robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty - total knee arthroplasty - learning curve
 

  • References

  • 1 Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A. What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?. Acta Orthop 2014; 85 (05) 480-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV. , et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (8, Suppl): 116-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (04) 560-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jacofsky DJ, Allen M. Robotics in arthroplasty: a comprehensive review. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2353-2363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Netravali NA, Shen F, Park Y, Bargar WL. A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop 2013; 2013 (13) 970703
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kim S-M, Park Y-S, Ha C-W, Lim S-J, Moon Y-W. Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA. Orthopedics 2012; 35 (09) e1334-e1339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Liow MHL, Chin PL, Tay KJD, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ. Early experiences with robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty using the DigiMatch™ ROBODOC® surgical system. Singapore Med J 2014; 55 (10) 529-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464 (464) 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee 2002; 9 (03) 173-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Coon TM. Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop 2009; 38 (2, Suppl): 7-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Redmond JM, Gupta A, Hammarstedt JE, Petrakos AE, Finch NA, Domb BG. The learning curve associated with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (01) 50-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 van der List JP, Chawla H, Joskowicz L, Pearle AD. Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (11) 3482-3495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Urish KL, Conditt M, Roche M, Rubash HE. Robotic total knee arthroplasty: surgical assistant for a customized normal kinematic knee. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (05) e822-e827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Song E-K, Seon J-K, Park S-J, Jung WB, Park HW, Lee GW. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (07) 1069-1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar