Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(03): E263-E275
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100194
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy for difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Praneet Korrapati
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago Illinois, USA
,
Jody Ciolino
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago Illinois, USA
,
Sachin Wani
2   Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
,
Janak Shah
3   Division of Gastroenterology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
,
Rabindra Watson
4   UCLA Division of Digestive Diseases, Los Angeles, California, USA
,
V. Raman Muthusamy
4   UCLA Division of Digestive Diseases, Los Angeles, California, USA
,
Jason Klapman
5   Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
,
Srinadh Komanduri
1   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago Illinois, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 28 July 2015

accepted after revision 15 December 2015

Publication Date:
04 February 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: Current evidence supporting the efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy (POC) in the evaluation and management of difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures is limited. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to assess the following: the efficacy of POC for the therapy of difficult bile duct stones, the diagnostic accuracy of POC for the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures, and the overall adverse event rates for POC.

Patients and methods: Patients referred for the removal of difficult bile duct stones or the evaluation of indeterminate strictures via POC were included. Search terms pertaining to cholangioscopy were used, and articles were selected based on preset inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment of the studies was completed with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. After critical literature review, relevant outcomes of interest were analyzed. Meta-regression was performed to examine potential sources of between-study variation. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger’s test.

Results: A total of 49 studies were included. The overall estimated stone clearance rate was 88 % (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 85 % – 91 %). The accuracy of POC was 89 % (95 %CI 84 % – 93 %) for making a visual diagnosis and and 79 % (95 %CI 74 % – 84 %) for making a histological diagnosis. The estimated overall adverse event rate was 7 % (95 %CI 6 % – 9 %).

Conclusions: POC is a safe and effective adjunctive tool with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the evaluation of bile duct strictures and the treatment of bile duct stones when conventional methods have failed. Prospective, controlled clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the precise role of POC during ERCP.

 
  • References

  • 1 Brauer BC, Shah RJ. Cholangioscopy in liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 2014; 18: 927-944
  • 2 Moon JH, Terheggen G, Choi HJ et al. Peroral cholangioscopy: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 276-282
  • 3 Parsi MA. Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 1-6
  • 4 Waxman I, Chennat J, Konda V. Peroral direct cholangioscopic-guided selective intrahepatic duct stent placement with an ultraslim endoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 875-878
  • 5 Shah RJ. Cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy. In: Howell DA, ed. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. Last updated August 3, 2015
  • 6 Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: W65-W94
  • 7 Wells GA, Shea B, Peterson JEA et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2014
  • 8 Akerman S, Rahman M, Bernstein DE. Direct cholangioscopy: the North Shore experience. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1406-1409
  • 9 Alameel T, Bain V, Sandha G. Clinical application of a single-operator direct visualization system improves the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 15-19
  • 10 Albert JG, Friedrich-Rust M, Elhendawy M et al. Peroral cholangioscopy for diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract disease using an ultra-slim gastroscope. [Erratum appears in Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1009]. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1004-1009
  • 11 Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2330-2334
  • 12 Awadallah NS, Chen YK, Piraka C et al. Is there a role for cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis?. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 284-291
  • 13 Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 805-814
  • 14 Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 832-841
  • 15 Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 347-353
  • 16 Draganov PV, Lin T, Chauhan S et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of ERCP-guided cholangiopancreatoscopy with a new direct visualization system. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 971-979
  • 17 Farnik H, Weigt J, Malfertheiner P et al. A multicenter study on the role of direct retrograde cholangioscopy in patients with inconclusive endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 16-21
  • 18 Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S et al. Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 542-547
  • 19 Fishman DS. Management of pancreaticobiliary disease using a new intra-ductal endoscope: the Texas experience. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1353-1358
  • 20 Fukuda Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y et al. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 374-382
  • 21 Hartman DJ, Slivka A, Giusto DA et al. Tissue yield and diagnostic efficacy of fluoroscopic and cholangioscopic techniques to assess indeterminate biliary strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1042-1046
  • 22 Huang SW, Lin CH, Lee MS et al. Residual common bile duct stones on direct peroral cholangioscopy using ultraslim endoscope. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 4966-4972
  • 23 Itoi T, Reddy ND, Sofuni A et al. Clinical evaluation of a prototype multi-bending peroral direct cholangioscope. Dig 2014; 26: 100-107
  • 24 Itoi T, Osanai M, Igarashi Y et al. Diagnostic peroral video cholangioscopy is an accurate diagnostic tool for patients with bile duct lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 934-938
  • 25 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic peroral direct cholangioscopy in patients with altered GI anatomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 441-449
  • 26 Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F et al. Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography. Digestive Endoscopy 2010; 22: S85-S89
  • 27 Jakobs R, Maier M, Kohler B et al. Peroral laser lithotripsy of difficult intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones: laser effectiveness using an automatic stone-tissue discrimination system. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 468-473
  • 28 Jakobs R, Pereira-Lima JC, Schuch AW et al. Endoscopic laser lithotripsy for complicated bile duct stones: is cholangioscopic guidance necessary?. Arq Gastroenterol 2007; 44: 137-140
  • 29 Kalaitzakis E, Webster GJ, Oppong KW et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic utility of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary lesions and bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 656-664
  • 30 Khan AH, Austin GL, Fukami N et al. Cholangiopancreatoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound for indeterminate pancreaticobiliary pathology. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 1110-1115
  • 31 Kim HI, Moon JH, Choi HJ et al. Holmium laser lithotripsy under direct peroral cholangioscopy by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for patients with retained bile duct stones (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1127-1132
  • 32 Lee TY, Cheon YK, Choe WH et al. Direct cholangioscopy-based holmium laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones by using an ultrathin upper endoscope without a separate biliary irrigating catheter. Photomed Laser Surg 2012; 30: 31-36
  • 33 Lee YN, Moon JH, Choi HJ et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultraslim upper endoscope for management of residual stones after mechanical lithotripsy for retained common bile duct stones. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 819-824
  • 34 Liu R, Cox RnK, Siddiqui A et al. Peroral cholangioscopy facilitates targeted tissue acquisition in patients with suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2014; 60: 127-133
  • 35 Manta R, Frazzoni M, Conigliaro R et al. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective, cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1569-1572
  • 36 Maydeo A, Kwek BE, Bhandari S et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy in patients with difficult biliary and pancreatic ductal stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1308-1314
  • 37 Meves V, Ell C, Pohl J. Efficacy and safety of direct transnasal cholangioscopy with standard ultraslim endoscopes: results of a large cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 88-94
  • 38 Moon JH, Ko BM, Choi HJ et al. Intraductal balloon-guided direct peroral cholangioscopy with an ultraslim upper endoscope (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 297-302
  • 39 Moon JH, Ko BM, Choi HJ et al. Direct peroral cholangioscopy using an ultra-slim upper endoscope for the treatment of retained bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2729-2733
  • 40 Mori A, Ohashi N, Nozaki M et al. Feasibility of duodenal balloon-assisted direct cholangioscopy with an ultrathin upper endoscope. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 1037-1044
  • 41 Neuhaus H, Hoffmann W, Zillinger C et al. Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones under direct visual control. Gut 1993; 34: 415-421
  • 42 Nguyen NQ, Schoeman MN, Ruszkiewicz A. Clinical utility of EUS before cholangioscopy in the evaluation of difficult biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 868-874
  • 43 Nishikawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of peroral video-cholangioscopic visual findings and cholangioscopy-guided forceps biopsy findings for indeterminate biliary lesions: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 219-226
  • 44 Osanai M, Itoi T, Igarashi Y et al. Peroral video cholangioscopy to evaluate indeterminate bile duct lesions and preoperative mucosal cancerous extension: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 635-642
  • 45 Patel SN, Rosenkranz L, Hooks B et al. Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary calculi using single-operator cholangioscopy: a multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 344-348
  • 46 Piraka C, Shah RJ, Awadallah NS et al. Transpapillary cholangioscopy-directed lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1333-1338
  • 47 Pohl J, Meves VC, Mayer G et al. Prospective randomized comparison of short-access mother-baby cholangioscopy versus direct cholangioscopy with ultraslim gastroscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 609-616
  • 48 Ramchandani M, Reddy DN, Gupta R et al. Role of single-operator peroral cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesions: a single-center, prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 511-519
  • 49 Sauer BG, Cerefice M, Swartz DC et al. Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for complicated biliary stones using direct choledochoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 253-256
  • 50 Sepe PS, Berzin TM, Sanaka S et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy for the extraction of cystic duct stones (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 206-210
  • 51 Shah RJ, Langer DA, Antillon MR et al. Cholangioscopy and cholangioscopic forceps biopsy in patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary pathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 219-225
  • 52 Siddiqui AA, Mehendiratta V, Jackson W et al. Identification of cholangiocarcinoma by using the Spyglass Spyscope system for peroral cholangioscopy and biopsy collection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 466-471 ; quiz e48
  • 53 Tischendorf JJ, Kruger M, Trautwein C et al. Cholangioscopic characterization of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. [Erratum appears in Endoscopy 2006; 38: 852]. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 665-669
  • 54 Tsuyuguchi T, Saisho H, Ishihara T et al. Long-term follow-up after treatment of Mirizzi syndrome by peroral cholangioscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 639-644
  • 55 Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Y, Sugiyama H et al. Long-term follow-up after peroral cholangioscopy-directed lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones, including Mirizzi syndrome: an analysis of risk factors predicting stone recurrence. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2179-2185
  • 56 Woo YS, Lee JK, Oh SH et al. Role of SpyGlass peroral cholangioscopy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 2565-2570
  • 57 Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56: 455-463
  • 58 Sun X, Zhou Z, Tian J et al. Is single-operator peroral cholangioscopy a useful tool for the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary lesion? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 79-87
  • 59 Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 79-87
  • 60 Lubbe J, Arnelo U, Lundell L et al. ERCP-guided cholangioscopy using a single-use system: nationwide register-based study of its use in clinical practice. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 802-807
  • 61 Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-1788