Endoscopic versus surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum: systematic review and meta-analysis

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background: Zenker’s diverticulum is a rare disease in the general population. Its treatment can be carried out by either an endoscopic or surgical approach. The objective of this study was to systematically identify all reports that compare both treatment modalities and to assess the outcomes in terms of length of procedure, length of hospitalization, time until diet introduction, complication rates, and recurrence rates.

Methods: A search of Medline and Embase selected all studies that compared different methods of surgical and endoscopic treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum published in the English, Portuguese, and Spanish languages between 1975 and 2014. The meta-analysis was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Data were extracted and analyzed for five different outcomes.

Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, describing outcomes of endoscopic versus surgical treatment for 596 patients with Zenker’s diverticulum. A meta-analysis of the studies suggested a statistically significant reduction in operating time and length of hospitalization, favoring endoscopic treatment (standardized mean difference (SMD) – 78.06, 95 %CI – 90.63, – 65.48 and SMD – 3.72, 95 %CI – 4.49, – 2.95, respectively), just as with the reduction in the fasting period (SMD – 4.30, 95 %CI – 5.18, – 3.42) and risk of complications (SMD – 0.09, 95 %CI 0.03, 0.43) for patients who had undergone the endoscopic approach in comparison with the surgical group. Also, a statistically significant reduction in the risk of symptom recurrence was seen when the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum was carried out by a surgical approach compared with endoscopic treatment (SMD 0.08, 95 %CI 0.03, 0.13).

Conclusion: Compared with a surgical approach, endoscopic treatment appeared to result in a shorter length of procedure and hospitalization, earlier diet introduction, and lower rates of complications, but in higher rates of symptom recurrence.

• References

• 1 Zenker FA, von Ziemssen H. Krankenheiten des oesophagus. In: von Ziemssen H, , ed. Handbuch der Speziellen Pathologie und Therapie. Leipzig: FCW Vogel; 1877: 1-87
  Google Scholar
• 2 Henry MA, Lerco MM, Tagliarini JV et al. Pharyngoesophageal diverticulum: evaluation of treatment results. Rev Col Bras Cir 2013; 40: 104-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Sabiston Jr DC. Textbook of surgery: The biological basis of modern surgical practice. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 4 Bizzotto A, Iacopini F, Landi R et al. Zenker’s diverticulum: exploring treatment options. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2013; 33: 219-229
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Peters JH, Mason R. The physiopathological basis for Zenker’s diverticulum. Chirurg 1999; 70: 741-746
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Fasano NC, Levine MS, Rubesin SE et al. Epiphrenic diverticulum: clinical and radiographic findings in 27 patients. Dysphagia 2003; 18: 9-15
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Klaus A, Hinder RA, Swain J et al. Management of epiphrenic diverticula. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 906-911
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Mosher HP. Webs and pouches of the esophagus, their diagnosis and treatment. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1917; 25: 175-187
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Dohlman G, Mattsson O. The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula: a roentgencinematographic study. AMA Arch Otolaryngol 1960; 71: 744-752
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Benjamin B, Innocenti M. Laser treatment of pharyngeal pouch. Aust N Z J Surg 1991; 61: 909-913
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Knegt PP, de Jong PC, van der Schans EJ. Endoscopic treatment of the hypopharyngeal diverticulum with the CO2 laser. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 205-206
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Von Doersten PG, Byl FM. Endoscopic Zenker’s diverticulotomy (Dohlman procedure): forty cases reviewed. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 209-212
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Nyrop M, Svendstrup F, Jørgensen KE. Endoscopic CO2 laser therapy of Zenker’s diverticulum – experience from 61 patients. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2000; 543: 232-234
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Collard JM, Otte JB, Kestens PJ. Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 573-576
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 van Eeden S, Lloyd RV, Tranter RM. Comparison of the endoscopic stapling technique with more established procedures for pharyngeal pouches: results and patient satisfaction survey. J Laryngol Otol 1999; 113: 237-240
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analysis. 01.02.2009 http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Seth R, Rajasekaran K, Lee WT et al. Patient reported outcomes in endoscopic and open transcervical treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 2014; 124: 119-125
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Koch M, Mantsopoulos K, Velegrakis S et al. Endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy versus open surgical approach in the treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 2090-2094
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Brace M, Taylor SM, Trites JR et al. Endoscopic stapling versus external transcervical approach for the treatment of Zenker diverticulum. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 39: 102-106
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Virós Porcuna D, Zarraonandía Andraca I, León Vintró X et al. Combined endoscopic treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum versus open approach; review of our experience. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2009; 60: 396-401
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Wirth D, Kern B, Guenin MO et al. Outcome and quality of life after open surgery versus endoscopic stapler-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19: 294-298
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Safdar A, Curran A, Timon CV. Endoscopic stapling vs conventional methods of surgery for pharyngeal pouches: results, benefits and modifications. Ir Med J 2004; 97: 75-76
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Smith SR, Genden EM, Urken ML. Endoscopic stapling technique for the treatment of Zenker diverticulum vs standard open-neck technique: a direct comparison and charge analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 128: 141-144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Gutschow CA, Hamoir M, Rombaux P et al. Management of pharyngoesophageal (Zenker’s) diverticulum: which technique?. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1677-1682 ; discussion 1682–1683
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Sydow BD, Levine MS, Rubesin SE et al. Radiographic findings and complications after surgical or endoscopic repair of Zenker’s diverticulum in 16 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 1067-1071
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21: 1539-1558
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Hedges LV, Pigott TD. The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 2004; 9: 426-445
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. New York, Chichester: Wiley; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 30 Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F et al. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?. Psychol Methods 2006; 11: 193-206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Liu IM, Agresti A. Mantel-Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratios with a stratified ordinal response. Bio-metrics 1996; 52: 1223-1234
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2014
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Hondo FY, Maluf-Filho F, Giordano-Nappi JH et al. Endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum by harmonic scalpel. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 666-671
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Brombart M. Le diverticule pharyngo-oesophagien de Zenker. Considerations pathogenetiques. J Belg Radiol 1953; 76: 128
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Chang CW, Burkey BB, Netterville JL et al. Carbon dioxide laser endoscopic diverticulotomy versus open diverticulectomy for Zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 519-527
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Visosky AM, Parke RB, Donovan DT. Endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum: factors predictive of success or failure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008; 117: 531-537
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Krespi Y, Kacker A, Remacle M. Endoscopic treatment of Zenker’s diverticulum using CO2 laser. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002; 127: 309-314
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Rizzetto C, Zaninotto G, Costantini M et al. Zenker’s diverticula: feasibility of a tailored approach based on diverticulum size. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 2057-2064
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Bloom JD, Bleier BS, Mirza N et al. Factors predicting endoscopic exposure of Zenker’s diverticulum. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010; 119: 736-741
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Saetti R, Silvestrini M, Peracchia A et al. Endoscopic stapler-assisted Zenker’s diverticulotomy: which is the best operative facility?. Head Neck 2006; 28: 1084-1089
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar