Endosc Int Open 2016; 04(06): E699-E708
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107069
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: a systematic review

Udayakumar Navaneethan
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
,
Muhammad K. Hasan
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
,
Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
2   Department of Internal Medicine, Brandon Regional Hospital, Brandon, FL, USA
,
Xiang Zhu
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
,
Robert H. Hawes
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
,
Shyam Varadarajulu
1   Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted: 07 January 2016

accepted after revision: 11 April 2016

Publication Date:
21 June 2016 (online)

Background and aims: Data on the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps are limited. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of sporadic non-ampullary duodenal polyps.

Methods: Relevant studies for the meta-analysis were identified through search of PUBMED and EMBASE databases. Studies employing EMR for the management of sporadic duodenal polyps in the non-ampullary region were included. The primary outcome was the surgical intervention rates due to non-curative endoscopic resection (incomplete removal/recurrence necessitating surgery) and/or management of procedural adverse events.

Results: A total of 440 patients (485 duodenal polyps) from 14 studies were included. The mean size of the polyps was 13 mm to 35 mm. Surgical intervention due to non-curative EMR and adverse events was required in 2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0 – 4 %). EMR was successfully accomplished in 93 % (95 %CI 89 – 97 %). The overall bleeding rate after EMR was 16 % (95 %CI 10 – 23 %), and the pooled delayed bleeding rate was 5 % (95 %CI 2 – 7 %). The overall incidence of perforation was 1 % (95 %CI 1 – 3 %). Over a median follow-up period of 6 – 72 months, the recurrence rate after EMR was 15 % (95 %CI 7 – 23 %). Six studies (pooled recurrence 20 %, 95 %CI 14 – 27 %) reported on the outcomes of managing recurrent polyps, for which endoscopic removal was successful in 62 % (95 %CI 37 – 87 %). There was no procedure related mortality.

Conclusion: EMR appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for management of sporadic non-ampullary duodenal polyps. Long-term endoscopic surveillance is required to manage and treat recurrent disease.

 
  • References

  • 1 Culver EL, McIntyre AS. Sporadic duodenal polyps: classification, investigation, and management. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 144-155
  • 2 Basford PJ, Bhandari P. Endoscopic management of nonampullary duodenal polyps. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 2012; 5: 127-138
  • 3 Galandiuk S, Hermann RE, Jagelman DG et al. Villous tumours of the duodenum. Ann Surg 1988; 207: 234-239
  • 4 Van Heumen BW, Mul K, Nagtegaal ID et al. Management of sporadic duodenal adenomas and the association with colorectal neoplasms: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 390-396
  • 5 Hassan C, Repici A, Sharma P et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2016; 65: 806-820
  • 6 Abbass R, Rigaux J, Al-Kawas FH. Nonampullary duodenal polyps: characteristics and endoscopic management. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 754-759
  • 7 Ahmad NA, Kochman ML, Long WB et al. Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 390-396
  • 8 Alexander S, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. EMR of large, sessile, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas: technical aspects and long-term outcome (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 66-73
  • 9 Apel D, Jakobs R, Spiethoff A et al. Follow-up after endoscopic snare resection of duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 444-448
  • 10 Conio M, De Ceglie A, Filiberti R et al. Cap-assisted EMR of large, sporadic, nonampullary duodenal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 1160-1169
  • 11 Binmoeller KF, Shah JN, Bhat YM et al. “Underwater” EMR of sporadic laterally spreading nonampullary duodenal adenomas (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 496-502
  • 12 Fanning SB, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. Giant laterally spreading tumors of the duodenum: endoscopic resection outcomes, limitations, and caveats. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 805-812
  • 13 Kedia P, Brensinger C, Ginsberg G. Endoscopic predictors of successful endoluminal eradication in sporadic duodenal adenomas and its acute complications. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1297-1301
  • 14 Kim HK, Chung WC, Lee BI et al. Efficacy and long-term outcome of endoscopic treatment of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenoma. Gut Liver 2010; 4: 373-377
  • 15 Lépilliez V, Chemaly M, Ponchon T et al. Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: an efficient technique with a substantial risk of delayed bleeding. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 806-810
  • 16 Min YW, Min BH, Kim ER et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment for nonampullary sporadic duodenal adenomas. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 2926-2932
  • 17 Navaneethan U, Lourdusamy D, Mehta D et al. Endoscopic resection of large sporadic non-ampullary duodenal polyps: efficacy and long-term recurrence. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 2616-2622
  • 18 Sohn JW, Jeon SW, Cho CM et al. Endoscopic resection of duodenal neoplasms: a single-center study. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 3195-3200
  • 19 Singh A, Siddiqui U, Konda V et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection for large non-ampullary duodenal adenomas: a single U.S. center experience. American College of Gastroenterology Abstract 2014;
  • 20 Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection in the duodenum: current limitations and future directions. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 127-132
  • 21 Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 270-274
  • 22 Takahashi T, Ando T, Kabeshima Y et al. Borderline cases between benignancy and malignancy of the duodenum diagnosed successfully by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Scand J Gastroenterol 2009; 44: 1377-1383
  • 23 Kedia P, Waye JD. Colon polypectomy: a review of routine and advanced techniques. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 657-665
  • 24 Farnell MB, Sakorafas GH, Sarr MG et al. Villous tumors of the duodenum: reappraisal of local vs. extended resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2000; 4: 13-21