C-Arm Computed Tomography Adds Diagnostic Information in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and a Positive V/Q SPECT

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To determine if C-Arm computed tomography (CACT) has added diagnostic value in patients suffering from chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) with a positive mismatch pattern in ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q SPECT).

Materials and Methods 28 patients (23 men, 5 women, 62 ± 18 years) with CTEPH who had undergone SPECT, followed by CACT and right heart catheterization (RHC) were included. Two independent readers reviewed SPECT and CACT. Findings indicating CTEPH and their location (segmental or sub-segmental) were identified (V/Q mismatch in SPECT and vascular pathologies in CACT). Inter-modality agreement was calculated (Cohen's Kappa). Findings were scored on a 3-point-scale. The sum of the score (pulmonary artery CTEPH severity score (PACSS)) was calculated for each patient and imaging modality, correlated to RHC (spearman's correlation) and compared to the final therapeutic decision of the CTEPH board (including the consensus of SPECT, selective pulmonary DSA and CACT).

Results Overall, 504 pulmonary artery segments were assessed in SPECT and CACT. SPECT had identified 266/504 (53 %) arterial segments without and 238/504 (47 %) segments with a V/Q mismatch indicating CTEPH. CACT detected 131/504 (26 %) segments without abnormal findings and 373/504 (74 %) segments with findings indicating CTEPH. Inter-modality agreement was fair (ĸ = 0.38). PACSS of CACT correlated mildly significantly with the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAPmean; rho = 0.48, p = 0.01), while SPECT missed significance (rho = 0.32, p = 0.1). Discrepant findings were mostly attributed to a higher frequency of sub-segmental pulmonary arterial pathologies on CACT (145 sub-segmental findings indicating CTEPH) rated as normal on SPECT.

Conclusion In patients with CTEPH, contrast-enhanced CACT detects additional findings with a better correlation to the severity of PAPmean than V/Q SPECT. CACT indicates abnormalities even in segments without V/Q abnormalities.

Key points

• CACT has additional value in V/Q SPECT-positive CTEPH patients.

• SPECT may underestimate the extent of CTEPH.

• CACT indicates abnormalities even in segments without V/Q abnormalities.

Citation Format

• Hinrichs JB, Werncke T, Kaireit T et al. C-Arm Computed Tomography Adds Diagnostic Information in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and a Positive V/Q SPECT. Fortschr Röntgenstr

Zusammenfassung

Ziele Evaluation der potentiellen diagnostischen Zusatzinformationen der pulmonalarteriellen C-Arm CT (CACT) bei Patienten mit chronisch thromboembolischer pulmonaler Hypertonie (CTEPH) und positivem Ventilations-/Perfusions-Mismatch in der Einzelphotonen-Emissionscomputertomografie (V/Q SPECT).

Material und Methoden 28 Patienten (23 Männer, 5 Frauen, 62 ± 18 Jahre) mit CTEPH wurden mittels SPECT, CACT und Rechtsherzkatheter (RHK) untersucht. Die SPECT und die CACT wurden von zwei unabhängigen Untersuchern beurteilt. Beide Untersuchungsmodalitäten wurden nach CTEPH-typischen Befunden ausgewertet, die Lokalisation der Befunde wurde bestimmt (segmental, sub-segmental) und mittels 3-Punktskala bewertet (pulmonary artery CTEPH severity score (PACSS)). Die Übereinstimmung der Modalitäten wurde berechnet (Cohen’s Kappa). Die Summe des PACSS wurde für jede Bildgebungsmodalität berechnet und mit der dem RHK korreliert (Spearman Korrelation). Außerdem wurde der PACSS mit der Therapieentscheidung des CTEPH-Boards verglichen (Grundlage: SPECT, selektive DSA und CACT).

Ergebnisse Insgesamt wurden 504 Pulmonalarteriensegmente in beiden Modalitäten untersucht. Die SPECT hat 266/504 (53 %) Segmente ohne Perfusionsausfälle und 238/504 (47 %) mit Perfusionsausfällen bewertet. Die CACT hat 131/504 (26 %) Segmente ohne CTEPH-typische Befunde bewertet, in 373/504 (74 %) Segmenten wurden CTEPH-typische Befunde erhoben. Die Übereinstimmung der Modalitäten hinsichtlich pathologischer Befunde war mäßig (ĸ = 0,38). Der PACSS_CACT korreliert signifikant mit dem mittleren pulmonalarteriellen Druck (rho = 0,48, p = 0,01), wohingegen der PACSS_SPECT keine signifikante Korrelation zeigt (rho = 0,32, p = 0,1). Die Abweichungen zwischen beiden Methoden sind hauptsächlich mit der höheren Detektionsrate der CACT von sub-segmentalen CTEPH-typischen Befunden zu erklären, diese wurden in der SPECT als normal bewertet.

Schlussfolgerung Die kontrastmittelverstärkte CACT weist im Vergleich zur SPECT zusätzliche CTEPH-typische Befunde mit einer besseren Korrelation zum pulmonalarteriellen Mitteldruck nach. Im Vergleich zur CACT unterschätzt die SPECT das Ausmaß und die Komplexität der vaskulären Befunde bei Patienten mit CTEPH.

Kernaussagen

• Die CACT hat einen zusätzlichen Nutzen bei CTEPH-Patienten mit positivem V/Q SPECT.

• Die SPECT kann das Ausmaß der CTEPH unterschätzen.

• Die CACT detektiert Befunde in Pulmonalarterien, die im V/Q SPECT keinen Befund aufweisen.

• References

• 1 Kim NH. Delcroix M. Jenkins DP. et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: D92-D99
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Hoeper MM. Madani MM. Nakanishi N. et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2: 573-582
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Pengo V. Lensing AWA. Prins MH. et al. Incidence of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension after Pulmonary Embolism. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2257-2264
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Soler X. Kerr KM. Marsh JJ. et al. Pilot study comparing SPECT perfusion scintigraphy with CT pulmonary angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Respirology 2012; 17: 180-184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Soler X. Hoh CK. Test VJ. et al. Single photon emission computed tomography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Respirology 2011; 16: 131-137
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Galiè N. Humbert M. Authors/Task Force Members. et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS)Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 67-119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Ogo T. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2015; 21: 425-431
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hinrichs JB. Marquardt S. Falck von C. et al. Comparison of C-arm Computed Tomography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39: 53-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hinrichs JB. Falck von C. Hoeper MM. et al. Pulmonary Artery Imaging in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Comparison of Cone-Beam CT and 64-Row Multidetector CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27: 361.e2-368.e2
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Sugiyama M. Fukuda T. Sanda Y. et al. Organized thrombus in pulmonary arteries in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; imaging with cone beam computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 2014; 1-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Fukuda T. Ogo T. Nakanishi N. et al. Evaluation of organized thrombus in distal pulmonary arteries in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension using cone-beam computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 2016; 1-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Dournes G. Verdier D. Montaudon M. et al. Dual-energy CT perfusion and angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: diagnostic accuracy and concordance with radionuclide scintigraphy. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 42-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lang IM. Madani M. Update on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation 2014; 130: 508-518
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Hinrichs JB. Renne J. Hoeper MM. et al. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty: applicability of C-Arm CT for procedure guidance. Eur Radiol 2016; 1-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Boyden EA. The Nomenclature of the Bronchopulmonary Segments and Their Blood Supply: (As Revised by the Seventh International Congress of Anatomists, 1960). Chest 1961; 39: 1-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Werncke T. Falck von C. Luepke M. et al. Collimation and Image Quality of C-Arm Computed Tomography: Potential of Radiation Dose Reduction While Maintaining Equal Image Quality. Invest Radiol 2015; 50: 514-521
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Charles MW. ICRP Publication 103: Recommendations of the ICRP†. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2008; 129: 500-507
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Hoeper MM. Barbera JA. Channick RN. et al. Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment of Non-Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: S85-S96
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kundel HL. Polansky M. Measurement of Observer Agreement. Radiology 2003; 228: 303-308
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Tunariu N. Gibbs SJR. Win Z. et al. Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy Is More Sensitive than Multidetector CTPA in Detecting Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease as a Treatable Cause of Pulmonary Hypertension. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 680-684
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 He J. Fang W. Lv B. et al. Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison of ventilation/perfusion scanning and multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pulmonary angiography. Nucl Med Commun 2012; 33: 459-463
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hong YJ. Kim JY. Choe KO. et al. Different perfusion pattern between acute and chronic pulmonary thromboembolism: evaluation with two-phase dual-energy perfusion CT. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 812-817
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Willemink MJ. Van Es HW. Koobs L. et al. CT evaluation of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Clinical Radiology 2012; 67: 277-285
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Stein PD. Woodard PK. Weg JG. et al. Diagnostic Pathways in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators 1. Radiology 2007; 242: 15-21
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bajc M. Neilly JB. Miniati M. et al. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: Part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 1356-1370
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Gutte H. Mortensen J. Jensen CV. et al. Detection of Pulmonary Embolism with Combined Ventilation–Perfusion SPECT and Low-Dose CT: Head-to-Head Comparison with Multidetector CT Angiography. J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 1987-1992
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Roach PJ. Gradinscak DJ. Schembri GP. et al. SPECT/CT in V/Q Scanning. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2010; 40: 455-466
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar