Das endoskopische Browlift mittels Endotine Forehead Device bei Fazialisparese

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die Augenpartie ist sowohl in funktioneller Hinsicht als auch für die Expression von Emotionen von zentraler Bedeutung. Eine chronische Fazialisparese mit Lähmung des Stirnastes kann zu einer Brauenptosis mit Einschränkungen des Gesichtsfeldes und einer deutlichen Asymmetrie des Gesichts führen. Das endoskopische Browlift mit resorbierbarem Endotine Forehead Device stellt ein attraktives Konzept zur Korrektur der Brauenptosis und Symmetrisierung der Stirn-/Brauenregion dar.

Material und Methoden Das endoskopische Augenbrauen- und Stirnlift unter Anwendung des Endotine Forehead Devices wurde in unserer Klinik bisher an 9 Patienten mit Fazialisparese durchgeführt. Das intraoperative Handling, Komplikationen und das postoperative Ergebnis wurden analysiert. Die Symmetrisierung der Augenbrauen wurde durch die FACEgram-Software erfasst. Zur postoperativen Abfrage der Patientenzufriedenheit wurde nach durchschnittlich 10 Monaten der Glasgow Benefit Inventory Fragebogen eingesetzt.

Ergebnisse Mit Hilfe des endoskopischen Stirnlifts mit dem Endotine Forehead Device gelang eine minimal-invasive, komplikationsarme Symmetrisierung der Stirn- und Augenbrauenregion. Operationsbedingte Morbiditäten wurden nicht kaum beobachtet. Folgende Komplikationen wurden beobachtet: Eine Patientin erlitt eine Rezidivptosis bei postoperativem Hämatom. Eine weitere empfand die Palpabilität des Device als störend. Die Patienten berichteten über eine postoperative Steigerung der Lebensqualität, d.er durchschnittliche Punktwert im Glasgow Benefit Inventory nach der Operation lag bei + 29,2 (SD 13,6).

Schlussfolgerungen Das endoskopische Brow- und Stirnlift mit dem Endotine Forehead Device stellt eine erfolgreiche, komplikationsarme Therapieoption bei Brauenptosis in Folge einer Fazialisparese dar.

Abstract

Objective Forehead and brows form a critical aesthetic and functional subunit of the face. Chronical pPeripheral paralysis of the facial nerve or its frontal branch may cause brow ptosis and eyelid deformities with a limited field of vision and loss of facial symmetry. Techniques, especially endoscopic methods have evolved significantly. Endotine Forehead Device, an adsorbable device, is a promising tool for brow suspension.

Material and Methods 9 patients underwent brow and forehead lift surgery via Endotine Forehead Device. Intraoperative handling, complications, and the surgical outcome were assessed. To analyze postoperative symmetry FACEgram software was used. Follow-up was about 3,6 months after surgery. As a patient oriented outcome parameter the Glasgow Benefit Inventory Questionnaire was assessed about 10 months after surgery.

Results Using the Endotine Forehead Device via an endoscopic approach was helpful to recreate a symmetrical upper third of the face. Few adverse effects could be observed:. One relapse was detected, one patient complained about the palpability of the device. Patients stated an improved quality of life after surgery, overall benefit in quality of life was +29,2 (SD 13,6).

Conclusions Endotine Forehead Device is a successful minimally invasive tool for endoscopic brow and forehead lift surgery in patients with facial paralysis.

• Literatur

• 1 Berisha F, Johnston A, McOwan PW. Identifying regions that carry the best information about global facial configurations. Journal of vision 2010; 10: 27
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Schmidt KL, Bhattacharya S, Denlinger R. Comparison of Deliberate and Spontaneous Facial Movement in Smiles and Eyebrow Raises. Journal of nonverbal behavior 2009; 33: 35-45
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Knoll BI, Attkiss KJ, Persing JA. The influence of forehead, brow, and periorbital aesthetics on perceived expression in the youthful face. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2008; 121: 1793-1802
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Paul MD. The evolution of the brow lift in aesthetic plastic surgery. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2001; 108: 1409-1424
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Passot R. La chirurgie esthetique des rides du visage. Presse Med 1919; 27
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Hunt H. Plastic Surgery of the Head, Face, and Neck. Philadelphia: Lea & Febinger; 1926
  Google Scholar
• 7 Paul MD. The surgical management of upper eyelid hooding. Aesthetic plastic surgery 1989; 13: 183-187
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Ulloa-Gonzales M. Facial wrinkels: Integral elimination. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1962; 29
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Vasconez L. The use of the endsocope in brow lifting. In, A video presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. Washington DC: 1992
  Google Scholar
• 10 Isse N. Endoscopic forehead lift. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Los Angeles: 1992
  Google Scholar
• 11 Stevens WG, Apfelberg DB, Stoker DA. et al. The endotine: a new biodegradable fixation device for endoscopic forehead lifts. Aesthetic surgery journal 2003; 23: 103-107
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Chasan PE, Kupfer DM. Direct K-wire fixation technique during endoscopic brow lift. Aesthetic plastic surgery 1998; 22: 338-340
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Landecker A, Buck JB, Grotting JC. A new resorbable tack fixation technique for endoscopic brow lifts. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2003; 111: 880-886 discussion 887–890
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Ramirez OM. Endoscopic techniques in facial rejuvenation: an overview. Part I. Aesthetic plastic surgery 1994; 18: 141-147
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 McKinney P, Sweis I. An accurate technique for fixation in endoscopic brow lift: a 5-year follow-up. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2001; 108: 1808-1810 discussion 1811–1804
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Byrne PJ. Efficacy and safety of endotine fixation device in endoscopic brow-lift. Archives of facial plastic surgery 2007; 9: 212-214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Servat JJ, Black EH. A comparison of surgical outcomes with the use of 2 different biodegradable multipoint fixation devices for endoscopic forehead elevation. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery 2012; 28: 401-404
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Loyo M, Jones D, Lee LN. et al. Treatment of the periocular complex in paralytic lagophthalmos. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology 2015; 124: 273-279
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ducic Y, Adelson R. Use of the endoscopic forehead-lift to improve brow position in persistent facial paralysis. Archives of facial plastic surgery 2005; 7: 51-54
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Rautio J, Pignatti M. Endoscopic forehead lift for ptosis of the brow caused by facial paralysis. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery 2001; 35: 51-56
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hadlock TA, Greenfield LJ, Wernick-Robinson M. et al. Multimodality approach to management of the paralyzed face. The Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 1385-1389
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Boehmler JHt, Judson BL, Davison SP. Reconstructive application of the endotine suspension devices. Archives of facial plastic surgery 2007; 9: 328-332
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 [Anonym]. The Glasgow Health Status Questionnaires Manual. In: Glasgow SIoHR. ed. Glasgow Royal Infirmary; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 24 Rohrich RJ, Beran SJ. Evolving fixation methods in endoscopically assisted forehead rejuvenation: controversies and rationale. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1997; 100: 1575-1582 discussion 1583–1574
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Troilius C. A comparison between subgaleal and subperiosteal brow lifts. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1999; 104: 1079-1090 discussion 1091–1072
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Romo 3rd T, Sclafani AP, Yung RT. et al. Endoscopic foreheadplasty: a histologic comparison of periosteal refixation after endoscopic versus bicoronal lift. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2000; 105: 1111-1117 discussion 1118–1119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Berkowitz RL, Apfelberg DB. Preliminary evaluation of a fast-absorbing multipoint fixation device. Aesthetic surgery journal 2008; 28: 584-588
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B. et al. A validated brow positioning grading scale. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery 2008; 34 (Suppl. 02) S150-154
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 House JW. Facial nerve grading systems. The Laryngoscope 1983; 93: 1056-1069
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 1985; 93: 146-147
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Hadlock TA, Urban LS. Toward a universal, automated facial measurement tool in facial reanimation. Archives of facial plastic surgery 2012; 14: 277-282
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Bray D, Henstrom DK, Cheney ML. et al. Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling. Archives of facial plastic surgery 2010; 12: 352-354
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Volk GF, Steigerwald F, Vitek P. et al. [Facial Disability Index and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale: validation of the German versions]. Laryngo- rhino- otologie 2015; 94: 163-168
  PubMedGoogle Scholar