MATERNAL RISK FACTORS FOR ABNORMAL VASCULAR COILING OF THE UMBILICAL CORD

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to identify maternal risk factors for abnormal vascular coiling of the umbilical cord. The umbilical cords of 657 neonates were examined and the coiling index determined by dividing the total number of complete vascular coils by the length of the cord in cm. Obstetrical history, delivery data, and neonatal outcome were also evaluated. The frequency distribution of umbilical coiling index was normal (10th and 90th percentile and mean ± SD = 0.17, 0.37, and 0.26 ± 0.09 coils/cm, respectively). Maternal risk factors for abnormal vascular coiling were extremes of age for hyper-coiling, obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preeclampsia for non-coiling. Hyper-coiled and non-coiled cords were significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome (p < 0.001) and cesarean delivery (p < 0.0001). Neonates whose mothers are old or young, obese, diabetic, or have preeclampsia are likely to have hyper-coiled or non-coiled umbilical blood vessels.

REFERENCES

• 1 Lacro R V, Jones K L, Benirschke K. The umbilical cord twist: origin, direction and relevance.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1987;  157 833-838
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Strong T H, Elliott J P, Radin T G. Non-coiled umbilical vessels: a new marker for the fetus at risk.  Obstet Gynecol . 1993;  81 409-411
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Rana J, Ebert G A, Kappy K A. Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index.  Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  85 573-577
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Strong T H, Jarles D L, Vega J S, Feldman D B. The umbilical coiling index.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  170 29-32
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S, Saygili U, Cinar O, Mumcu A. Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the foetus at risk?.  Br J Clin Pract . 1996;  50 254-256
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Weeks J W, Smith A, Hogue T, Spinnato J A, Gall S A. The umbilical coiling index and feto-placental characteristics [abstract].  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  172 320
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Del Valle O G, Santerini K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Gaudier F L, Delke I. The straight umbilical cord: significance and prenatal implications [abstract].  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  172 286
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Strong T H, Finberg H J, Mattox J H. Antepartum diagnosis of noncoiled umbilical cords.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1994;  170 1729-1733
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Degani S, Lewinsky R M, Berger H, Spiegel D. Sonographic estimation of umbilical coiling index and correlation with Doppler flow characteristics.  Obstet Gynecol . 1995;  86 990-993
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Nakai Y, Imanaka M, Nishio J, Ogita S. Umbilical venous pulsation associated with hypercoiled cord in growth-retarded fetuses.  Obstet Gynecol Invest . 1997;  43 64-67
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Nakai Y, Imanaka M, Nishio J, Ogita S. Umbilical venous pulsation and regional circulatory disturbance.  Ultrasound Med Biol . 1997;  23 1165-1169
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Sherer D M, Anyaegbunam A. Prenatal ultrasonographic morphologic assessment of the umbilical cord: a review.  Obstet Gynecol Surv . 1997;  52 506-523
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Strong T H, Marniquez-Gilpin M P, Gilpin B G. Umbilical vascular coiling and nuchal entanglement.  J Matern Fetal Med . 1996;  5 359-361
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Dado G M, Dorbin P B, Merkvicka R S. Venous flow through coiled and noncoiled umbilical cords.  J Reproduct Med . 1997;  42 576-580
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Lee K S, Ferguson R M, Corpur M, Gartner L M. Maternal age and incidence of low birthweight at term: a population study.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1988;  158 84-89
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar