Mucinous Cystadenomas and Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas in Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: In mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas, diagnosis using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is limited to cystic formations that communicate with the main pancreatic duct. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a new, sophisticated method which is currently under evaluation. The authors describe the usefulness of MRCP in diagnosis of mucin-producing tumors.

Patients and Methods: Six patients with mucin-producing tumors were investigated using MRCP and ERCP. Imaging was compared with surgery and histopathological examinations.

Results: Three patients were found to have mucinous cystadenomas (MC), two patients had intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMT) and one patient had a cystadenocarcinoma. MRCP demonstrated the cystic formations in all patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed contrast-mediated enhancement of the cystic wall in patients with MC, and visualized the pancreatic ducts completely in patients with IPMT. ERCP failed to visualize the cystic lesion in one patient with MC of the pancreatic tail. Furthermore, ERCP showed evidence of IPMT in dilated main ducts with multiple filling defects but did not visualize the ducts completely.

Conclusions: MRCP provides visualization of pancreatic ducts, extraductal variations, and cystic formations more completely than ERCP does. It avoids complications seen in ERCP. MRCP may replace ERCP in the evaluation of mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas.

References

• 1 Buetow P C, Rao P, Thompson L DR. Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: radiologic-pathologic correlation.  RadioGraphics. 1998;  18 433-449
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Loftus E V, Olivares-Pakzad B A, Batts K P, et al. Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathologic features, outcome, and nomenclature.  Gastroenterology. 1996;  110 1909-1918
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Siech M, Tripp K, Schmidt-Rohlfing B, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumor of the pancreas.  Am J Surg. 1999;  177 117-120
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Pavone E, Metha S N, Hilzenrat N, et al. Role of ERCP in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 877-890
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Devière J, Matos C, Cremer M. The impact of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on ERCP.   Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 136-140 (discussion: 140 - 143)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 1-10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Sherman S, Lehman G A. ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.  Pancreas. 1991;  6 350-367
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Albert J, Adamek H E, Weitz M, et al. The place of MR-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliary-pancreatic disease (review).  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1998;  123 1149-1155
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Soto J A, Barish M A, Yucel E K, et al. Pancreatic duct: MR cholangiopancreatography with a three-dimensional fast spin echo technique.  Radiology. 1995;  196 459-464
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Grundmann E, Hermanek P, Wagner G. Tumorhistologieschlüssel. 2nd edn.  Berlin; Springer, 1997: 64-71
• 11 Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Palazzo L, et al. Intraductal papillary and mucinous tumors of the pancreas: accuracy of preoperative computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography, and long-term outcome in a large surgical series.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 42-49
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Koito K, Namieno T, Ichimura T, et al. Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography with ER cholangiopancreatography.  Radiology. 1998;  208 231-237
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Sasaki M, et al. HASTE MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas.  J Comp Assist Tomography. 1999;  23 301-305
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Hachiya J. Intraductal papillary tumors of the pancreas: evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 156-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Onaya H, Itai Y, Niitsu M, et al. Ductectatic mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.  Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  171 171-177
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Myung S J, Kim M H, Kim H J, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is insufficient for the detection of flat lesions in mucinous ductal ectasia: pancreatoscopy may be needed additionally.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 1189
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Tajiri H, Kobayashi M, Ohtsu A, et al. Peroral pancreatoscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic disease.  Pancreas. 1998;  16 408-412
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Jung M, Zipf A, Schoonbroodt D, et al. Is pancreatoscopy of any benefit in clarifying the diagnosis of pancreatic duct lesions?.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 273-280
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kaneko T, Nakao A, Nomoto S, et al. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy with the ultrathin pancreatoscope for mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas.  Arch Surg. 1998;  133 263-267
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

H. E. Adamek, M.D.

Medizinische Klinik C Klinikum Ludwigshafen

Bremserstrasse 79 67063 Ludwigshafen Germany

Fax: Fax:+ 49-621-503-4112

Email: E-mail:MedCLu@t-online.de