Imaging of Hepatic Steatosis

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Hepatic steatosis is a common finding encountered during cross-sectional imaging examinations. This article reviews the imaging findings of hepatic steatosis as revealed by sonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Focal fatty sparing and focal hepatic steatosis are conditions that can create potential diagnostic challenges for the radiologist. The typical findings, distribution, and etiology of these focal processes are presented. In the setting of diffuse hepatic steatosis, hepatic mass lesions can be difficult to discern on both computed tomography and sonography, with reported decreased sensitivity and specificity of lesion detection. In such cases, magnetic resonance imaging may be the imaging procedure of choice for the detection and characterization of both hepatic steatosis and coexistent hepatic masses. Some hepatocellular neoplasms, particularly hepatic adenoma and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, can have intratumoral lipid. By demonstrating the lipid content of these masses, imaging can add specificity in characterizing them as hepatocellular in origin because nonhepatocellular neoplasms in general do not contain intracellular lipid.

REFERENCES

• 1 Quinn S F, Gosink B B. Characteristic sonographic signs of hepatic fatty infiltration.  AJR . 1985;  145 753-755
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Sanford N L, Walsh P, Matis C. Is ultrasonography useful in the assessment of diffuse parenchymal liver disease?.  Gastroenterology . 1985;  89 186-191
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Celle G, Savarino V, Picciotto A. Is hepatic ultrasonography a valid alternative tool to liver biopsy?.  <~>Report on 507 cases studied with both techniques. Dig Dis Sci . 1988;  33 467-471
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Berrut C, Curati W, de Gautard R. [The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse liver disease].  Schweiz Med Wochenschr J Suisse Med . 1986;  116 215-218
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Needleman L, Kurtz A B, Rifkin M D. Sonography of diffuse benign liver disease: accuracy of pattern recognition and grading.  AJR . 1986;  146 1011-1015
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kissin C M, Bellamy E A, Cosgrove D O. Focal sparing in fatty infiltration of the liver.  Br J Radiol . 1986;  59 25-28
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Jacobs J E, Birnbaum B A, Shapiro M A. Diagnostic criteria for fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast-enhanced helical CT.  AJR . 1998;  171 659-664
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Piekarski J, Goldberg H I, Royal S A. Difference between liver and spleen CT numbers in the normal adult: its usefulness in predicting the presence of diffuse liver disease.  Radiology . 1980;  137 727-729
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kawata R, Sakata K, Kunieda T. Quantitative evaluation of fatty liver by computed tomography in rabbits.  AJR . 1984;  142 741-746
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Johnston R J, Stamm E R, Lewin J M. Diagnosis of fatty infiltration of the liver on contrast enhanced CT: limitations of liver-minus-spleen attenuation difference measurements.  Abdom Imaging . 1998;  23 409-415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Chambers T P, Baron R L, Lush R M. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.  Radiology . 1994;  190 721-725
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Fishbein M H, Gardner K G, Potter C J. Introduction of fast MR imaging in the assessment of hepatic steatosis.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1997;  15 287-293
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Petersein J, Schima W, Saini S. Comparison of in-phase and out-of-phase gradient recalled echo T1-weighted pulse sequence for MR imaging of malignant liver masses following administration of paramagnetic gadolinium-chelate.  Abdom Imaging . 2000;  25 159-163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Outwater E K, Blasbalg R, Siegelman E S. Detection of lipid in abdominal tissues with opposed-phase gradient-echo images at 1.5 T: techniques and diagnostic importance.  Radiographics . 1998;  18 1465-1480
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Mendler M H, Bouillet P, Le Sidaner A. Dual-energy CT in the diagnosis and quantification of fatty liver: limited clinical value in comparison to ultrasound scan and single- energy CT, with special reference to iron overload.  J Hepatol . 1998;  28 785-794
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Lipman J C, Stomper P C, Kaplan W D. Detection of hepatic metastases in diffuse fatty infiltration by CT: the complementary role of imaging.  Clin Nucl Med . 1988;  13 602-605
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Debaere C, Rigauts H, Laukens P. Transient focal fatty liver infiltration mimicking liver metastasis.  J Belge Radiol . 1998;  81 174-175
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Scott Jr W W, Sanders R C, Siegelman S S. Irregular fatty infiltration of the liver: diagnostic dilemmas.  AJR . 1980;  135 67-71
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Onaya H, Itai Y, Kurosaki Y. Metastatic tumors in irregular fatty liver mimicking focal sparing.  Radiat Med . 1994;  12 69-73
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kato M, Saji S, Kanematsu M. A case of liver metastasis from colon cancer masquerading as focal sparing in a fatty liver.  Jpn J Clin Oncol . 1997;  27 189-192
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Arita T, Matsunaga N, Honma Y. Focally spared area of fatty liver caused by arterioportal shunt.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1996;  20 360-362
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Arai K, Matsui O, Takashima T. Focal spared areas in fatty liver caused by regional decreased portal flow.  AJR . 1988;  151 300-302
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Sauerbrei E E, Lopez M. Pseudotumor of the quadrate lobe in hepatic sonography: a sign of generalized fatty infiltration.  AJR . 1986;  147 923-927
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kawamori Y, Matsui O, Takahashi S. Focal hepatic fatty infiltration in the posterior edge of the medial segment associated with aberrant gastric venous drainage: CT, US, and MR findings.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1996;  17 590-595
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M. Aberrant gastric venous drainage in a focal spared area of segment IV in fatty liver: demonstration with color Doppler sonography.  Radiology . 1997;  203 461-463
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Matsui O, Kadoya M, Takahashi S. Focal sparing of segment IV in fatty livers shown by sonography and CT: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage.  AJR . 1995;  164 1137-1140
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Matsui O, Takahashi S, Kadoya M. Pseudolesion in segment IV of the liver at CT during arterial portography: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage.  Radiology . 1994;  193 31-35
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Itai Y. Peritumoral sparing of fatty liver: another important instance of focal sparing caused by a hepatic tumor (Letter; comment).  AJR . 2000;  174 868-870
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Grossholz M, Terrier F, Rubbia L. Focal sparing in the fatty liver as a sign of an adjacent space-occupying lesion.  AJR . 1998;  171 1391-1395
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Chen K, Hiramatsu Y, Yunoki M. [Focal sparing around the gallbladder in fatty liver: an useful sign in the diagnosis of borderline cases by CT].  Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi . 1989;  49 146-152
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Tochio H, Kudo M, Okabe Y. Association between a focal spared area in the fatty liver and intrahepatic efferent blood flow from the gallbladder wall: evaluation with color Doppler sonography.  AJR . 1999;  172 1249-1253
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima T. Focal fatty change of the liver adjacent to the falciform ligament: CT and sonographic findings in five surgically confirmed cases.  AJR . 1987;  149 491-494
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Baker M K, Wenker J C, Cockerill E M. Focal fatty infiltration of the liver: diagnostic imaging.  Radiographics . 1985;  5 923-929
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Dao T H, Mathieu D, Thu N T. Value of MR imaging in evaluating focal fatty infiltration of the liver: preliminary study.  Radiographics . 1991;  11 1003-1012
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Brawer M K, Austin G E, Lewin K J. Focal fatty change of the liver, a hitherto poorly recognized entity.  Gastroenterology . 1980;  78 247-252
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Kawashima A, Suehiro S, Murayama S. Focal fatty infiltration of the liver mimicking a tumor: sonographic and CT features.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1986;  10 329-331
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Layfield L J. Focal fatty change of the liver: cytologic findings in a radiographic mimic of metastases.  Diagn Cytopathol. 1994;  11 385-387 387 discussion-389 discussion
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Outwater E K, Bhatia M, Siegelman E S. Lipid in renal clear cell carcinoma: detection on opposed-phase gradient-echo MR images.  Radiology . 1997;  205 103-107
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Schlund J F, Kenney P J, Brown E D. Adrenocortical carcinoma: MR imaging appearance with current techniques.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1995;  5 171-174
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Mathieu D, Paret M, Mahfouz A E. Hyperintense benign liver lesions on spin-echo T1-weighted MR images: pathologic correlations.  Abdom Imaging . 1997;  22 410-417
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Martin J, Puig J, Falco J. Hyperechoic liver nodules: characterization with proton fat-water chemical shift MR imaging [published erratum appears in Radiology 1998 Aug;208(2):556].  Radiology . 1998;  207 325-330
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Martin J, Sentis M, Zidan A. Fatty metamorphosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with chemical shift gradient-echo MR imaging.  Radiology . 1995;  195 125-130
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Mortele K J, Stubbe J, Praet M. Intratumoral steatosis in focal nodular hyperplasia coinciding with diffuse hepatic steatosis: CT and MRI findings with histologic correlation.  Abdom Imaging . 2000;  25 179-181
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Castillo M, Kwock L, Mukherji S K. Clinical application of proton MR spectroscopy.  AJNR . 1996;  17 1-15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron D B, Hricak H. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm³) spatial resolution.  Radiology . 1996;  198 795-805
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Longo R, Ricci C, Masutti F. Fatty infiltration of the liver. Quantification by ¹H localized magnetic resonance spectroscopy and comparison with computed tomography.  Invest Radiol . 1993;  28 297-302
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Longo R, Pollesello P, Ricci C. Proton MR spectroscopy in quantitative in vivo determination of fat content in human liver steatosis.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1995;  5 281-285
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Thomsen C, Becker U, Winkler K. Quantification of liver fat using magnetic resonance spectroscopy.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1994;  12 487-495
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Rosen B R, Carter E A, Pykett I L. Proton chemical shift imaging: an evaluation of its clinical potential using an in vivo fatty liver model.  Radiology . 1985;  154 469-472
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 McKenzie A, Gill G, McIntosh R. Computed tomographic and ultrasound appearances of focal spared areas in fatty infiltration of the liver.  Australas Radiol . 1991;  35 166-168
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Martin J, Sentis M, Puig J. Comparison of in-phase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1996;  20 890-897
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Rofsky N M, Weinreb J C, Ambrosino M M. Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1996;  20 230-235
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Siegelman E S, Outwater E K. MR imaging techniques of the liver.  Radiol Clin North Am . 1998;  36 263-286
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Mitchell D G, Palazzo J, Hann H W. Hepatocellular tumors with high signal on T1-weighted MR images: chemical shift MR imaging and histologic correlation.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1991;  15 762-769
  PubMedGoogle Scholar