Endoscopy 2002; 34(6): 435-440
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-31995
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Patient Pain During Colonoscopy: An Analysis Using Real-Time Magnetic Endoscope Imaging

S.  G.  Shah1 , J.  C.  Brooker1 , C.  Thapar1 , C.  B.  Williams1 , B.  P.  Saunders1
  • 1Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, London, United Kingdom
Further Information

Publication History

23 August 2001

21 January 2002

Publication Date:
04 June 2002 (online)

Background and Study Aims: Colonoscopy is generally perceived as being a painful procedure. Contributory factors are: stretching of the colonic wall and mesenteric attachments from looping of the instrument shaft, overinsufflation, the degree of torque or force applied to the colonoscope shaft, and patient pain threshold. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pain episodes experienced during diagnostic colonoscopy and the corresponding colonoscope configuration, utilizing real-time magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI).
Patients and Methods: Consecutive outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were studied. Patients with previous colonic resections were excluded. Procedures were commenced with antispasmodics only, and patient sedation was self-administered whenever significant discomfort was experienced, using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) syringe pump. All “demands” were correlated with the MEI record, which was subsequently analysed.

Results: A total of 650 demands were recorded in 102 patients. Seventy-seven percent of all demands occurred with the colonoscope tip in the sigmoid colon, 7 % in the descending colon, 6 % at the splenic flexure, 5 % in the transverse colon, and 4 % in the proximal colon. Ninety percent of all pain episodes coincided with either looping (79 %) or straightening of the colonoscope shaft (11 %); presumed overinsufflation being an infrequent cause of pain (9 %). Of the loops encountered during colonoscopy, the N-sigmoid spiral loop was associated with the majority of pain episodes (56 %). Looping was both more frequent (P = 0.0002) and less well tolerated in women than in men (P = 0.0140).
Conclusions: This study is the first to document pain at colonoscopy accurately. Looping, particularly in the variable anatomy of the sigmoid colon, is the major cause of pain, especially in women. Use of MEI may improve pain control by facilitating the straightening of loops within the sigmoid colon, and by enabling the endoscopist to target patient analgesia.

References

  • 1 Cotton P B, Williams C B. Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy. 4th ed. Oxford; Blackwell Scientific 1996
  • 2 Arrowsmith J B, Gerstman B B, Fleischer D E, Benjamin S B. Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 421-427
  • 3 Appleyard M N, Mosse C A, Mills T N. et al . The measurement of forces exerted during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 237-240
  • 4 Hull T, Church J M. Colonoscopy: how difficult, how painful?.  Surg Endosc. 1994;  8 784-787
  • 5 Church J M. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 556-560
  • 6 Saunders B P, Phillips R KS, Williams C B. Intraoperative measurements of colonic anatomy and attachments with relevance to colonoscopy.  Br J Surg. 1995;  82 1491-1493
  • 7 Saunders B P, Fukumoto M, Halligan S. et al . Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 124-126
  • 8 Ravi J, Brodmerkel G J, Agrawal R M. et al . Does prior abdominal surgery or pelvic surgery affect length of insertion of the colonoscope? [abstract].  Endoscopy. 1988;  20 43
  • 9 Cirocco W C, Rusin L C. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 964-968
  • 10 Bladen J S, Anderson A P, Bell G D. et al . Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes.  Lancet. 1993;  341 719-722
  • 11 Williams C B, Guy C, Gilles D, Saunders B P. Electronic three-dimensional imaging of intestinal endoscopy.  Lancet. 1993;  341 724-725
  • 12 Cervero F. Neurophysiology of gastrointestinal pain.  Baillière's Clin Gastroenterol. 1988;  2 183-199
  • 13 Mayer E A, Gebhart G F. Basic and clinical aspects of visceral hyperalgesia.  Gastroenterology. 1994;  107 271-293
  • 14 Wood J D, Alpers D H, Andrews P LR. Fundamentals of neurogastroenterology.  Gut. 1999;  45 (Suppl 2) 6-16
  • 15 Whitehead W E, Holtkotter B, Enck P. et al . Tolerance for rectosigmoid distension in irritable bowel syndrome.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  98 1187-1192
  • 16 Sakai Y. Techniques in colonoscopy. In: Sivak M Jr (ed) Gastroenterological endoscopy. Philadelphia; Saunders 1987: 840-867
  • 17 Hunt R H. Colonoscopy intubation techniques with fluoroscopy. In: Hunt RH, Waye JD (eds) Colonoscopy: techniques, clinical practice, and colour atlas. London; Chapman and Hall 1981: 109-146
  • 18 Shah S G, Saunders B P, Brooker J C, Williams C B. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 1-8
  • 19 Sadahiro S, Ohmura T, Yamada Y. Analysis of length and surface area of each segment of the large intestine according to age, sex, and physique.  Surg Radiol Anat. 1992;  14 251-257
  • 20 Rowland R S, Bell G D, Dogramadzi S, Allen C. Colonoscopy aided by magnetic 3D imaging: is the technique sufficiently sensitive to detect differences between men and women?.  Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999;  37 673-679
  • 21 Marshall J B. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  44 675-678
  • 22 Bat L, Williams C B. Usefulness of paediatric colonoscopes in adult colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 329-332

B. P. Saunders, M.D.

Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark’s Hospital

Watford Road, Harrow · London HA1 3UJ · United Kingdom

Fax: + 44-208-423-3588

Email: b.saunders@ic.ac.uk

    >