Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 50(3): 160-163
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-32412
Original Cardiovascular
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting for CABG -
a Randomized, Prospective Trial

U.  P.  Schurr1 , M.  L.  Lachat1 , O.  Reuthebuch1 , A.  Kadner1 , M.  Mäder1 , B.  Seiffert2 , S.  P.  Hoerstrup1 , G.  Zünd1 , M.  Genoni3 , M.  I.  Turina1
  • 1Clinic of Cardiovascular Surgery
  • 2Institute of Biostatistics, University Hospital Zurich
  • 3Department of Cardiac Surgery, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
This paper was presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Leipzig, February 18 - 21, 2001
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 June 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background: The saphenous vein is an established conduit for coronary revascularization. Disadvantages of traditional harvest technique are significant pain and morbidity. We compared the endoscopic harvest technique with the traditional method. Method: 140 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients were randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH; n = 80) and traditional open vein harvesting (OVH; n = 60). Analysis included preoperative risk factors for wound complication, harvesting time, graft injury, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patient follow-up lasted 3 months. Results: The preoperative risk profiles of the groups were comparable. In the EVH group, 5 patients (7.1 %) had to be switched to the open technique. EVH time was 45 ± 6.2 min vs. 31.1 ± 6.5 min. Two patients (2.5 %) had to be revised because of bleeding complication vs. 6 (10 %) in the OVH group. No local infections or wound complications were observed in the EVH group vs. 11 (18 %) cases in the OVH group. Two OVH cases (3.6 %) were readmitted for wound debridement. All EVH patients reported less pain and were completely satisfied by the cosmetic results. Conclusion: EVH is a safe and efficient technique for CABG. Morbidity was significantly lower, with reduced pain and better cosmetic results. EVH time was significantly longer compared to the traditional harvesting technique.

Key words

Vein harvesting, endoscopic - CABG, cardiac

References

  • 1 Lumsden A B, Eaves F FIII. Endoscopic vein harvest. Bostwick J III. Eaves FF III, Nahai Endoscopic Plastic Surgery, St. Louis, Quality Medical Publishing, Inc. 1997: 535-547
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Wipke-Tevis D B, Stotts N A, Skov P, Carrieri-Kohlmann V. Frequency, manifestations and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions.  Heart & Lung. 1996;  25 108-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Delaria G A, Hunter J A, Goldin M D, Serry C, Javid H, Najafi H. Leg wound complications associated with coronary revascularisation.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;  81 403-407
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Allen K B, Griffith G L, Heimansohn D A. et al . Endoscopic vs. traditional saphenous vein harvesting: a prospective, randomized trial.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 26-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carrizo G J, Livesay J J, Luy L. Endoscopic harvesting of the greater saphenous vein for aortocoronary bypass grafting.  Tex Heart Inst J.. 1999;  26 120-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Utley J R, Thomason M E, Wallace D J. Preoperative correlates of impaired wound healing after saphenous vein excision.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;  98 47-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Slaughter M S, Olson M M, Lee J T, Ward H B. A fifteen year wound surveillance study after coronary artery bypass.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;  56 1063-1068
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wilson A P, Livesey S A, Treasure T, Gruneberg R N, Sturridge M F. Factors predisposing to wound infections in cardiac surgery. A prospective study of 517 patients.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1987;  1 158-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Crouch J D, O'Hair D P, Keuler J P, Kleinmann L H. Open vs. Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting: Wound complications and vein quality.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 1513-1516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Folliguet T A, Le B ret, Moneta A, Musumeci S, Laborde F. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting vs. open technique. A prospective study.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;  13 662-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Davis Z, Jacobs K H, Zhang M, Thomas C, Castallenos Y. Endoscopic vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: Technique and outcomes.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  116 228-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Isgro F, Weisse U, Voss B, Kiessling A H, Saggau W. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: is there an improvement of the results with the endoscopic approach?.  Euro J Cardio-thorac Surg. 1999;  16 (Suppl 2) S58-S60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Caprino P A, Khabbaz K R, Bojar R, Rastegar H, Warner K G, Murphy R E, Payne D. Clinical benefits of endoscopic vein harvesting in patients with risk factors for saphenectomy wound infections undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  119 69-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Vrancic J M, Piccinini , Vaccarino G, Iparraguirre E, Albertal J, Navia D. Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: Initial experience and learning curve.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 1086-1089
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Cable D G, Dearani J A, Pfeiffer E A, Daly R C, Schaff H V. Minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting: endothelial integrity and early clinical results.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 139-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

MD Ulrich PF Schurr

Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich

Raemistrasse 100


8091 Zurich

Switzerland

Phone: +41 (1) 2551111

Fax: +41 (1) 2554369

Email: ulrich.schurr@chi.usz.ch

      >