Origins of the Sensory Examination in Neurology

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Formal testing of sensation as part of the neurological examination followed the improvements in examination techniques as well as advances in neuroscience. By the 1890s, the observation that temperature sense was frequently impaired at the same time that pain was appreciated led to the supposition that the two paths traveled closely. Through the works of Brown-Séquard and Edinger the existence of a crossed afferent tract was verified. The distinction between two sensory pathways was clear by 1898, when van Gehuchten reported a case of syringomyelia and suggested that the pain and temperature fibers were carried anterolaterally and the position sense fibers carried posteriorly in the spinal cord. Many authors describing patients with tabes dorsalis suspected the posterior columns of the spinal cord played a key role in position sense. It is difficult to determine in the 19th century who first employed the use of movements of joints as a test for proprioceptive function; however, Bell in 1826 recognized what he termed a sixth sense, which later was characterized as proprioceptive function. Goldscheider went on to report the degrees of movement that were considered normal for each joint. Although vibratory sense had been described by Cardano and Ingrassia in the 16th century and tests had been developed by Rinne and Rumpf by the 19th century, it was not until 1903 that Rydel and Seiffer found that vibratory sense and proprioceptive sense were closely related and that both senses were carried in the posterior columns of the spinal cord. By 1955, the sensory examination included tests for light-touch, superficial pain, temperature, position sense, vibration, muscle (deep pain), and two-point discrimination. Tests for these sensibilities still remain in use. We will review the origins of the understanding of sensation, which ultimately led to the development of the sensory examination. We will highlight individuals who made important discoveries and observations, as well as review the history of each of the elements of the sensory examination.

REFERENCES

• 1 Haerer A. DeJong's, The Neurologic Examination.  5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1992
  Google Scholar
• 2 Mueller J. Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen fuer Vorlesungen.  2nd ed. Coblenz: J. Hoelscher 1840
  Google Scholar
• 3 Frey M V. Beitraege sur Sinnesphysiologie der Haut. Saechsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig.  Math-Phys Cl . 1895;  47 166-184
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Sinclair D C. Cutaneous sensation and the doctrine of specific energy.  Brain . 1955;  78 584-611
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Head H. Studies in Clinical Neurology.  London: Hodder & Stoughton 1920: 334-728
  Google Scholar
• 6 Sherrington C. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System.  New Haven: Charles Scribner's Sons 1906
  Google Scholar
• 7 Foerster O. The motor cortex in man in the light of Hughlings Jackson's doctrines.  Brain . 1936;  59 135-159
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Keele K D. Anatomies of Pain.  Springfield: Thomas 1957
  Google Scholar
• 9 Gowers W R. The Diagnosis of Diseases of the Spinal Cord.  London: J & A Churchill 1880
  Google Scholar
• 10 Gowers W R. Lectures on the Diagnosis of Diseases of the Brain.  London: J & A Churchill 1885
  Google Scholar
• 11 Gowers W R. A Manual of Disease of the Nervous System.  Vol. 1. London: Churchill 1888: 6-10
  Google Scholar
• 12 Brown-Séquard C. Experimental researches applied to physiology and pathology.  Medical Examiner. Vol. 8. Philadelphia: Baillière 1852: 481-504
  Google Scholar
• 13 Edinger L. Anatomie des Centres Nerveux.  Paris: J.B. Bailliere et Fils 1889
  Google Scholar
• 14 Edinger L. Einfuhrung in die Lehre vom Bau und den Verrichtungen des Nervensystems.  Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel 1912
  Google Scholar
• 15 Gehuchten A V. Les Centres Nerveux Cerebrospinaux.  Louvain: Uystpruyst-Dieudonne 1908
  Google Scholar
• 16 Charcot J. Ataxie locomotrice progressive; arthopathie de l'epaule gauche resultats necroseopiques.  Arch Physiol Norm Path . 1869;  2 121
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 von Romberg M H. Tabes dorsalis. Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheiten des Menschen Vol. 1. Berlin: Duncker 1846: 795
• 18 von Romberg M H. In: Sieveking EH, ed., trans. Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheiten des Menschen. London: Sydenham Society; 1853 [AMotNDoM volumes]
• 19 Bell C. On the nervous circle which connects the voluntary muscles with the brain.  Phil Trans (part 2) . 1826;  116
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Goldscheider J A E A K. Die spezifische Energie der Temperaturnerven.  Mh Prakt Derm . 1884;  3 225
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Goldscheider J A E A K. Neue Thatsachen uber die Hautsinnesnerven.  Arch Anat Physiol Abt Supll . 1885;  1
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Pearce J M. Early days of the tuning fork.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psych . 1998;  65 728-733
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Ng M, Jackler R K. Early history of tuning-fork tests.  Am J Otol . 1993;  14 100-105
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Rinne F. Rinne, Friedrich Heinrich. Beiträge zur Physiologie des menschlichen Ohres. Beiträge zur Physiologie des menschlichen Ohres Leipzig and Heidelberg: Zeitschrift für rationelle Medicin 1864: 12
  Google Scholar
• 25 Rumpf H. Ueber einen Fall von Syringomyelie nebst Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Sensibilitat.  Neurologisches Zentralblatt. 1889; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Rydel A, Seiffer W. Untersuchungen uber das vibrationsgefuhl oder die sog. "Knockensensibilitat" (Pallasthesie).  Arch Psychol Nerven Krankheiten . 1903;  37 487-536
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Hall M. Lectures on the Nervous System and its Diseases.  Vol. 27. London: Sherwood, Gilbert, Pyer 1836
  Google Scholar
• 28 Brach B. Einige Worte ueber einen nicht hinlanglich beachteten Punkt aus der Physiologie der Nerven und eine eigenthumliche Art von Lahmung.  Medicinische Zeitung . 1840;  9 215-217
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Lanska D J, Goetz C G. Romberg's sign: development, adoption, and adaptation in the 19th century.  Neurology . 2000;  55 1201-1206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Pryse-Phillips W. Companion to Clinical Neurology.  New York: Little Brown and Company 1995
  Google Scholar
• 31 Charcot J. Histologie de la sclérose en plaques.  Gazette des hôpitaux . 1868;  41 554-555
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Charcot J RP. Les Démoniaques Dans L'art.  Paris: A. Delahaye & E. Lecrosnier 1887
  Google Scholar
• 33 Goetz C G, Bonduelle M, Gelfand T. Charcot: Constructing Neurology.  New York: Oxford University Press 1995
  Google Scholar
• 34 Sherrington C. Experiments in the examination of the peripheral distribution of the fibres of the posterior roots of some spinal nerves.  Philosophical Transactions B . 1898;  190 45-186
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Sherrington C. On the proprio-ceptive system, especially in its reflex aspect.  Brain . 1906;  29 467-482
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Sinclair D C, Weddell G, Feindel W H. Referred pain and associated phenomena.  Brain . 1948;  71 184-209
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Head H, Rivers W HR. The afferent nervous system from a new aspect.  Brain . 1911;  28 99-115
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Head H, Holmes G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions.  Brain . 1911;  34 102-254
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Head H. Six clinical lectures on the diagnostic value of sensory changes in diseases of the nervous system.  Clin J . 1913;  40 337-408
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Head H, Riddoch G. The automatic bladder, excessive sweating and some other reflex conditions in gross injuries of the spinal cord.  Brain . 1917;  40 188-263
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Head H. Special Report Ser Med Research Council . 1918: 28
  Google Scholar
• 42 Head H, Rivers W HR. A human experiment in nerve division.  Brain . 1908;  31 323-450
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Henson R A. Henry Head's work on sensation.  Brain . 1961;  84 535-539
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Henson R A. Henry Head: his influence on the development of ideas on sensation.  Br Med Bull . 1977;  33 91-96
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Henson R A. Henry Head: man of culture, compassion and science.  J Med Biogr . 1998;  6 15-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Head H, Campbell A W. The pathology of herpes zoster and its bearing on sensory localization.  Brain . 1900;  23 353-523
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Head H T. The grouping of afferent impulses within the spinal cord.  Brain . 1906;  29 537-541
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Foerster O. The dermatomes in man.  Brain . 1933;  56 1-39
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Boller F, Keefe N C, Zoccolotti P. Luigi Galvani, body electricity and the galvanic skin response.  Neurology . 1989;  39 868-870
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Weber H D. A Contribution to the Pathology of the Crura Cerebri. London: Medico-Chirurgical Transactions; 1863,46:121-139
  Google Scholar
• 51 Erlanger J, Gasser H S. The compound nature of the action current of nerve as disclosed by the cathode ray oscilloscope.  Am J Physiol . 1924;  70 624
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Gasser H S, Erlanger J. The role of fiber size in the establishment of a nerve block by pressure or cocaine.  Amer J Physiol . 1929;  88 581-591
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Dyke P. Automated system to evaluate sensation.  Annals of Neurology . 1978;  4 502-508
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Bing R. Compendium of Regional Diagnosis in Affectations of the Brain and Spinal Cord.  3rd Ed. St. Louis: F.S. Arnold 1929
  Google Scholar
• 55 Lewandowsky M. Handbuk ser Neurologie.  Bd 1. Allg. Neurologie 11. Berlin: Springer 1910: 499-502
  Google Scholar
• 56 Bloedel J R, McCreery D B. Organization of peripheral and central pain pathways.  Surg Neurol . 1975;  4 65-75
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Holmes G. Disorders of sensation produced by cortical lesions.  Brain . 1927;  50 413-427
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Weber E. Ueber die Gestalt des Gehirns der Schleie, Cyprinus tinca, im Alter von einem Jahr und bei dem erwachsenen Thiere.  Berlin: Arch Anat Physiol wissen Med 1846: 478
  Google Scholar
• 59 Feldmann H. [History of the tuning fork. III: On the way to quantitative pure-tone measurement. Pictures from the history of otorhinolaryngology, represented by instruments from the collection of the Ingolstadt <~>German Medical History Museum].  Laryngorhinootologie . 1997;  76 428-434
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Feldmann H. [History of the tuning fork. II: Evolution of the classical experiments by Weber, Rinne and Schwabach].  Laryngorhinootologie . 1997;  76 318-326
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Feldmann H. [History of the tuning fork. I: Invention of the tuning fork, its course in music and natural sciences. Pictures from the history of otorhinolaryngology, presented by instruments from the collection of the Ingolstadt German Medical History Museum].  Laryngorhinootologie . 1997;  76 116-122
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Egger M. CR Soc Biol Paris .  1898;  50 815-817
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Charcot J, Pitres J A. Les Centres Moteurs Corticaux Chez l'Homme.  Paris: Rueff & Cie 1895
  Google Scholar
• 64 Kuehne W. Ueber den Sehpurpur.  Heidelberg: Untersuchungen physiologisches Institut 1878: 15-103
  Google Scholar
• 65 Ferrier D T. An experimental research upon cerebro-cortical afferent and efferent tracts.  Proc Roy Soc Lond . 1901;  62 1-3
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Zimmermann E. Preis-Liste über psychologische und physiologische Apparate. Leipzig: 1903: 114
  Google Scholar