Aktuelle Peelingmethoden

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Zur Behandlung von aktinisch geschädigter Haut und Falten stehen gegenwärtig zahlreiche Methoden wie Dermabrasion, Chemical- und Laser-Peel zur Verfügung. Aktuelle chemische Peelmethoden lassen sich je nach Eindringtiefe in oberflächliche, mitteltiefe und tiefe Peels mit fließenden Übergängen einteilen. Die Peelmethoden können dem Hautbefund angepasst werden durch die Auswahl der entsprechenden Peelsubstanz, ihrer Konzentration, durch den Druck und Frequenz der Applikationen. Durch Standardisierung der Peellösung können die Einwirktiefe bestimmt und Nebenwirkungen minimiert werden. Das weiteste Indikationsspektrum besitzt Trichloressigsäure (TCA) in verschiedenen Kozentrationen und Kombination mit anderen Peelsubstanzen mit breiter Anwendungsmöglichkeit von oberflächlich bis tief im Gesicht, an Hals, Decolleté und Extremitäten. Die nebenwirkungsarmen chemischen Peelmethoden bieten Vorteile beim Skin resurfacing durch niedrige Investitionskosten und eine einfache Operationstechnik.

Abstract

Various methods like dermabrasion, laser skin resurfacing or chemical peeling are being used for the treatment of photoaged skin. Chemical peeling is classified according to the depth of the resultant peel. Peels are classified as superficial, medium depth. The peeling can be matched to the needs of the patient by varying the type, concentration and method of application of the peeling agent and the number of coats applied. By standardization of the peeling agent the injury depth can be quantitated and thus complications can be avoided. Trichloracetic acid (TCA) is popular for its versatility in peeling. TCA is useful in many concentrations and combinations with other peeling agents. TCA can be employed to create superficial, medium or deep peeling of facial skin as well as of the skin of the neck, the decolleté and the arms. Chemical peeling has a low rate of complications and is popular due to the low costs involved and a technique which is easy to learn.

Literatur

• 1 Asken S. Unoccluded Baker-Gordon phenol-peels-reviews and update.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;  15 998-1008
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Alt T H. Occluded Baker-Gordon chemical peel: Review and update.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;  15 980-993
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Baker T J, Gordon H L. The ablation of rhytides by chemical means; a preliminary report.  J Fla Med Assoc. 1961;  48 541
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Baker T J, Gordon H L, Mosienko P. et al . Long-term histologic study of skin after chemical face peeling.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;  53 522
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Bernstein E F, Lee J, Brown D. et al . Glycolic acid treatment increases type I. Collagen mRNA and hyaluronic acid content of human skin.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 429-433
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Bergfeld W, Tung R, Vidimos A. et al . Improving the cosmetic appearance of photoaged skin with glycolic acid.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;  36 1011-1013
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Botta S A, Straith R E, Goodwin H H. Cardiac arrhythmias in phenol face peeling: A suggested protocol for prevention.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1988;  2 115-117
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Brody H J. Chemical peeling. St. Louis; Mosby Year Book 1992
  Google Scholar
• 9 Brown A, Kaplan L, Brown M. Phenol induced histologic changes: Hazards, techniques and uses.  Br J Plast Surg. 1960;  13 158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Bryan C P. Ancient Egyptian medicine: the papyrus Ebers (Übersetzung). Chicago; Ares Publishers 1974: 158-161
  Google Scholar
• 11 Chew J. et al . Treatment of upper lip wrinkles: A comparison of 950 µs dwell time Carbon Dioxide Laser with Unoccluded Baker's Phenol Chemical peel.  J Dermatol Surg. 1999;  25 262-266
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Clark R A. Cutaneous tissue repair basic biologic considerations: I.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;  13 701-725
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Coleman W P, Lawrence N. Skin resurfacing. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 1998
  Google Scholar
• 14 Duffy D. Alpha hydroxy acids/trichloracetic acids, risk benefit strategies.  J Dermatol Surg. 1998;  24 181-189
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Fitzpatrick T B. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I throught VI.  Arch Dermatol. 1988;  124 869-871
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Garcia A, Fulton J E Jr. The combination of glycolic acid versus hydroquinone or kojic acid for the treatment of melasma and related conditions.  Dermatol Surg. 1996;  22 443-447
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gillitzer R. Modernes Wundmanagement.  Hautarzt. 2002;  53 130-145
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Gleason M T, Gosselin R F, Hodge H C. et al .In: Clinical toxicology of commercial products. Baltimore; Williams & Wilkins 1998: 189-192
  Google Scholar
• 19 Gross B G, Maschek F. Phenol chemosurgery for removal of deep facial wrinkles.  Intl J Dermatol. 1980;  19 159-164
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kligman A M, Baker T J, Gordon H J. Long term histologic follow-up of phenol face peels.  Plast Reconst Surg. 1985;  75 652-659
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Litton C. Chemical face peeling.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;  29 371
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Litton C, Trinidat G. Complications of chemical face peeling as evaluated by a questionnaire.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;  67 738-744
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 MacKee G, Karp F. The treatment of post-acne scars with phenol.  Br J Dermatol. 1952;  64 456-459
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Malony B P, Millman B, Monheit G, McCollough E G. The etiology of prolonged erythema after chemical peel.  Dermatol Surg. 1998;  24 337-341
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Mandy S. Tretinoin in the preoperative and postoperative management of dermabrasion.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;  15 878-879
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Monheit G D. Chemical peeling for pigmentary dyschromias.  Cosm Dermatol. 1995;  8 10-15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Monheit G D. Combination medium-depth peeling: The Jessner's and TCA peel.  Facial Plast Surg. 1996;  12 117-124
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Morrow D M. Chemical peeling of eyelids and periorbital area.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992;  18 102-110
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Moy L S, Peace S, Moy R L. Comparison of the effect of various chemical peeling agents in a mini-pig model.  Dermatol Surg. 1996;  22 429-432
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Nelson B R. et al . Pilot histologic and ultrastructural study of medium-depth chemical facial peels on dermal collagen in patients with actinically damaged skin.  J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;  32 472-478
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Peikert J M, Krywonis N A, Rest E B, Zachary C B. The efficacy of various degreasing agents used in trichloroacetic acid peels.  J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994;  20 742-728
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Spira M, Dahl C, Freeman R. et al . Chemosurgery: A histologic study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;  45 247
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Stegman S J. A comparative histologic study of the effects of three peeling agents and dermabrasion on normal and sun-damaged skin.  Aesth Plast Surg. 1982;  6 123-135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Van Scott E J, Yu R U. Hyperkeratinization corneocyte cohesion and alpha hydroxy acids.  J Acad Dermatol. 1984;  11 876-879
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Witheiler D D, Lawrence N, Cox S E. et al . Long-term efficacy and safety of Jessner's solution and 35 % trichloroacetic acid vs 5 % fluorouracil in the treatment of widespread facial actinic keratoses.  Dermatol Surg. 1997;  23 191-196
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Luitgard G. Wiest

Hautärztin

Residenzstraße 7 · 80333 München