Biological Variation in Variables Associated with Exercise Training

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

To be able to identify a training induced change in a certain variable, it is necessary to know the background variation. In this study the coefficient of variation (total, between-subjects, within-subjects), the relative sources of variance (between-subjects and within-subjects), and the critical difference (within-subjects) were estimated in four categories of variables (performance and physiological variables, metabolic and hormonal variables, immunological variables, and mood state variables) in 15 moderately trained male runners measured on three different occasions over a period of 7 weeks. In the performance and physiological variables, 78.9 % of the variance was due to variation between subjects and they had the lowest critical difference (11.9 %). In contrast, the metabolic and hormonal variables had the highest critical difference (59.9 %) and 53.4 % of the variance was due to variations within subjects. The immunological and psychological variables had about two thirds of the variance arising from variation between subjects. However, the critical difference for the immunological variables was high (47.4 %), while it was relatively low for the psychological variables (26.8 %). The low critical difference and variation within subjects of the psychological and in particular the performance and physiological variables indicate that they may be beneficial as primary markers of training induced changes.

References

• 1 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-238
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Selected issues in the design and analysis of sport performance research.  J Sports Sci. 2001;  19 811-827
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Bliss C I. Statistics in Biology.  In: Subsampling in relation to experimental design. New York; McGraw-Hill Book Company 1967: 348-403
  Google Scholar
• 5 Cavanagh P R, Williams K R. The effect of stride length variation on oxygen uptake during distance running.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 30-35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Dill D B, Costill D L. Calculation of percentage changes in volumes of blood, plasma, and red cells in dehydration.  J Appl Physiol. 1974;  37 247-248
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Fraser C G, Harris E K. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry.  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1989;  27 409-437
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Fraser C G, Hyltoft Petersen P, Larsen M L. Setting analytical goals for random analytical error in specific clinical monitoring situations.  Clin Chem. 1990;  36 1625-1628
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Fry R W, Morton A R, Keast D. Overtraining in athletes. An update.  Sports Med. 1991;  12 32-65
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Hansen S, Cold S, Petersen P H, Rose C. Estimates of the sources of variation (variance components) of bioelectric impedance and anthropometric measurements in an epidemiological case-control study of breast cancer.  Eur J Clin Nutr. 1997;  51 764-770
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Harris E K, Yasaka T. On the calculation of a “reference change” for comparing two consecutive measurements.  Clin Chem. 1983;  29 25-30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Hopkins W G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.  Sports Med. 2000;  30 1-15
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Hopkins W G, Schabort E J, Hawley J A. Reliability of power in physical performance tests.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 211-234
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Howley E T, Bassett D R Jr, Welch H G. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;  27 1292-1301
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Jensen K, Johansen L. Reproducibility and validity of physiological parameters measured in cyclists riding on racing bikes placed on a stationary magnetic brake.  Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998;  8 1-6
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 McNair D N, Lorr M, Droppleman L F. Profile of Mood States Manual. San Diego; Educational and Industrial Testing Service 1992
  Google Scholar
• 17 Morgan D W, Martin P E, Krahenbuhl G S, Baldini F D. Variability in running economy and mechanics among trained male runners.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;  23 378-383
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Palmer G S, Dennis S C, Noakes T D, Hawley J A. Assessment of the reproducibility of performance testing on an air-braked cycle ergometer.  Int J Sports Med. 1996;  17 293-298
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia Lario JV, Hernandez A, Jimenez C V, Minchinela J, Perich C, Simon M. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress.  Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;  59 491-500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Schabort E J, Hawley J A, Hopkins W G, Mujika I, Noakes T D. A new reliable laboratory test of endurance performance for road cyclists.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 1744-1750
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Scholander P F. Analyzer for accurate estimation of respiratory gases in one-half cubic centimeter samples.  J Biol Chem. 1947;  167 235-250
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Sebastian Gambaro M A, Liron Hernandez F J, Fuentes Arderiu X. Intra- and inter-individual biological variability data bank.  Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997;  35 845-852
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

M. Bagger, M.Sc

Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics · University of Southern Denmark · Main Campus: Odense University

Campusvej 55 · 5230 Odense M · Denmark ·

Phone: +45-65503552

Fax: +45-65503480

Email: mbagger@health.sdu.dk