Techniques of Selective Cannulation and Sphincterotomy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Selective access into the desired duct followed by incision of the sphincter, i. e. sphincterotomy, forms the cornerstone of any endoscopic intervention within the pancreaticobiliary system. The apprehensive beginner’s performance and hesitance is aggravated by ignorance of ampullary anatomy and he considers selective cannulation to be the greatest hurdle. An understanding of ampullary morphology and its variations is vital in achieving selective cannulation. Technological advances have assisted in the form of development of better accessories, progressing from ”immovable” catheters to movable cannulae and to single-, double-, and even triple-lumen sphincterotomes. Orientation along the long axis of the bile duct ensures access and avoids inadvertent and hazardous manipulation of the pancreatitic duct. Using guide wires, especially the ‘angulated-tip’ glide wire improves cannulation successs rates considerably. Precut accessotomy complements wire-guided selective cannulation, and can be used analogously to a controlled surgical incision to facilitate cannulation of the desired system after deroofing the papilla layer by layer. Published data have validated its role, demonstrating high efficacy and minimal complications when it is properly performed. Biliary sphincterotomy, using the right mode of blended current in the 11–12 o’clock direction and with the tip of the sphincterotome wire, provides a clean and bloodless splitting open of the sphincter of Oddi. Pancreatic precut, over-the-stent papillotomy and sphincterotomy over a guide wire have all been proven to be safe and effective measures, in large groups of patients. In special situations, such as where there are impacted stones or ampullary lesions, needle-knife infundibulotomy achieves reliable access. Techniques such as saline infiltration into the papilla and subtle body movements to re-position the scope enable biliary cannulation in difficult situations. Alterations in anatomy, for instance post Billroth II gastrectomy, no longer discourage the endoscopist from attempting intervention. Application of knowledge of reverse anatomy, specially designed instruments, and adherence to the proper technique improves success in these patients. Our experience of 9000 sphincterotomies over the past 12 years with minimal morbidity stands proof to the principles and techniques highlighted in this monograph. We recommend these to all aspiring endoscopists, with the assurance of improved technical success when they are implemented.

References

• 1 Shakoor T, Geenen J E. Pre-cut papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 623-627
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Leung J WC, Banez V P, Chung S CS. et al . Pre-cut needle knife papillotomy for impacted common bile duct stone at the ampulla.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;  85 991-993
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Sherman S, Ruffolo T A, Hawes R H, Lehman G A. et al . Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  101 1068-1075
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Tweedle D EF, Martin D F. Needle knife pre-cut papillotomy for sphincterotomy and cholangiography.  Gut. 1989;  30 A1460-1461
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Huibregtse K, Katon R M, Tytgat G NJ. Pre-cut papillotomy via the needle knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 403-405
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-923
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Foutch P G. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 25-32
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider T, Hahn E. et al . Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy.  Endoscopy. 1997;  46 207-211
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Booth F V, Doerr R J, Khalafi R S. et al . Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy.  Am J Surg. 1990;  159 132-135
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Dowsett J F, Polydorou A A, Vaira D. et al . Needle-knife papillotomy: how safe and how effective?.  Gut. 1990;  31 905-908
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Visse C A, Flament J-B. et al . Ampulla of Vater: anatomic, embryologic and surgical aspects.  Surg Clin N Am. 2000;  80 201-212
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Pancreatitis from endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES): a prospective multi-centre, 30-day study [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 108A
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Kohler A, Maier M, Benz C. et al . A new HF current generator with automatically controlled system (Endocut mode) for endoscopic sphincterotomy – preliminary experience.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 351-355
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Jackobs R, Benz C, Leonhardt A. et al . Pancreatic endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a single-center experience in 171 consecutive patients.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 551-554
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Ell C, Rabenstein T, Schneider T. et al . Safety and efficacy of pancreatic sphincterotomy in chronic pancreatis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 244-249
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Tantau M, Person B, Burtin P. et al . Duodenal diverticula and ERCP: a new trick.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 326
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Fogel E L, Sherman S, Lehman G A. Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 396-400
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 O’Connor H J, Bhutta A S, Redmond P L. et al . Supra-papillary fistulo-sphincterotomy at ERCP: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 266-270
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lehman G A, Sherman S, Nisi R. et al . Pancreas divisum: results of minor papilla sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 1-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. A. Maydeo, M. D.Director 

Digestive Disease Centre

143 OM Chambers · August Kranti Marg · Mumbai 400036

Fax: +91-22-23616755

Email: ddc_endo@hotmail.com