Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2003; 7(4): 297-307
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815677
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

T 2 Mapping of Muscle

Carolynn Patten1,2,3 , Ronald A. Meyer4 , James L. Fleckenstein5
  • 1Rehabilitation Research & Development Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto,.CA
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA
  • 4Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
  • 5University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 January 2004 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Muscle activation produces increases in magnetic resonance (T 2) signal intensity leading to recruitment images that demonstrate spatial patterns and intensity of muscle activation. These T 2 activation maps are useful for visualizing and quantifying various aspects of muscle function. Activity-dependent changes in T 2 result from an increase in the T 2 relaxation time of muscle water. The current state of investigation indicates that the mechanism of increased T 2 results from osmotically driven shifts of muscle water that increase the volume of the intracellular space and from intracellular acidification resulting from the end products of metabolism. Although the spatial resolution of magnetic resonance imaging is still insufficient to map territories of individual motor units, it is possible to demonstrate nonuniform activation between subregions or compartments of muscle. Taken together, the attributes of the T 2 mapping technique hold great potential for demonstrating aberrant muscle activation patterns in pathology and positive adaptation to exercise or rehabilitative intervention.

KEYWORDS

MRI - muscle - T 2

REFERENCES

  • 1 Shellock F G, Tyson L L, Fleckenstein J L. Diagnostic Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Exercise Physiology and Pathophysiology. In: Fleckenstein JL, Crues JV, Reimers CD, editors. Muscle Imaging in Health and Disease New York: Springer 1996: 113-132
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Drace J E, Pelc N J. Measurement of skeletal muscle motion in vivo with phase-contrast MR imaging.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1994;  4 157-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pappas G P, Asakawa D S, Delp S L, Zajac F E, Drace J E. Nonuniform shortening in the biceps brachii during elbow flexion.  J Appl Physiol . 2002;  92 2381-2389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Asakawa D S, Blemker S S, Gold G E, Delp S L. In vivo motion of the rectus femoris muscle after tendon transfer surgery.  J Biomech . 2002;  35 1029-1037
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kent-Braun J A, Ng A V, Castro M. et al . Strength, skeletal muscle composition, and enzyme activity in multiple sclerosis.  J Appl Physiol . 1997;  83 1998-2004
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kent-Braun J A, McCully K K, Chance B. Metabolic effects of training in humans: a 31P-MRS study.  J Appl Physiol . 1990;  69 1165-1170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fleckenstein J L, Canby R C, Parkey R W, Peshock R M. Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle in normal volunteers.  AJR Am J Roentgenol . 1988;  151 231-237
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fisher M J, Meyer R A, Adams G R, Foley J M, Potchen E J. Direct relationship between proton T2 and exercise intensity in skeletal muscle MR images.  Invest Radiol . 1990;  25 480-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Adams G R, Duvoisin M R, Dudley G A. Magnetic resonance imaging and electromyography as indexes of muscle function.  J Appl Physiol . 1992;  73 1578-1583
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yue G, Alexander A L, Laidlaw D H, Gmitro A F, Unger E C, Enoka R M. Sensitivity of muscle proton spin-spin relaxation time as an index of muscle activation.  . 1994;  77 84-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ploutz L L, Tesch P A, Biro R L, Dudley G A. Effect of resistance training on muscle use during exercise.  J Appl Physiol . 1994;  76 1675-1681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Akima H, Takahashi H, Kuno S-Y. et al . Early phase adaptations of muscle use and strength to isokinetic training.  Med Sci Sports Exerc . 1999;  31 588-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Meyer R A, Prior B M. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of muscle.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev . 2000;  28 89-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fleckenstein J L. MRI of neuromuscular disease: the basics.  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol . 2000;  4 393-419
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Fleckenstein J L, Bertocci L A, Nunnally R L, Parkey R W, Peshock R M. 1989 ARRS Executive Council Award. Exercise-enhanced MR imaging of variations in forearm muscle anatomy and use: Importance in MR spectroscopy.  Am J Roentgenol . 1989;  153 693-698
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Disler D G, Cohen M S, Krebs D E, Roy S H, Rosenthal D I. Dynamic evaluation of exercising leg muscle in healthy subjects with echo planar MR imaging: work rate and total work determine rate of T2 change.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1995;  5 588-593
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kilcoyne R F, Richardson M L, Porter B A, Olson D O, Greenlee T K, Lanzer W. Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissue masses.  Clin Orthop 1988 Mar;(288):13-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Prior B M, Foley J M, Jayaraman R C, Meyer R A. Pixel T2 distribution in functional magnetic resonance images of muscle.  J Appl Physiol . 1999;  87 2107-2114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ray C A, Dudley G A. Muscle use during dynamic knee extension: implication for perfusion and metabolism.  J Appl Physiol . 1998;  85 1194-1197
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 McComas A J, Galea V, De Bruin H. Motor unit populations in healthy and diseased muscles.  Phys Ther . 1993;  73(12) 868-877
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Fleckenstein J L, Watumull D, McIntire D D, Bertocci L A, Chason D P, Peshock R M. Muscle proton T2 relaxation times and work during repetitive maximal voluntary exercise.  J Appl Physiol . 1993;  74 2855-2859
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Jenner G, Foley J M, Cooper T G, Potchen E J, Meyer R A. Changes in magnetic resonance images of muscle depend on exercise intensity and duration, not work.  J Appl Physiol . 1994;  76 2119-2124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shellock F G, Fukunaga T, Mink J H, Edgerton V R. Acute effects of exercise on MR imaging of skeletal muscle: concentric vs eccentric actions.  Am J Roentgenol . 1991;  156 765-768
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fleckenstein J L, Haller R G, Lewis S F. et al . Absence of exercise-induced MRI enhancement of skeletal muscle in McArdle's disease.  J Appl Physiol . 1991;  71 961-969
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Fleckenstein J L, Watumull D, Bertocci L A, Parkey R W, Peshock R M. Finger-specific flexor recruitment in humans: depiction by exercise-enhanced MRI.  J Appl Physiol . 1992;  72 1974-1977
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Houmard J A, Smith R, Jendrasiak G L. Relationship between MRI relaxation time and muscle fiber composition.  J Appl Physiol . 1995;  78 807-809
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Donahue K M, Van Kylen J, Guven S. et al . Simultaneous gradient-echo/spin-echo EPI of graded ischemia in human skeletal muscle.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1998;  8 1106-1113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sjogaard G, Saltin B. Extra- and intracellular water spaces in muscles of man at rest and with dynamic exercise.  Am J Physiol . 1982;  243 R271-R280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sjogaard G, Adams R P, Saltin B. Water and ion shifts in skeletal muscle of humans with intense dynamic knee extension.  Am J Physiol . 1985;  248 R190-R196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lundvall J, Mellander S, Westling H, White T. Fluid transfer between blood and tissues during exercise.  Acta Physiol Scand . 1972;  85 258-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ploutz-Snyder L L, Nyren S, Cooper T G, Potchen E J, Meyer R A. Different effects of exercise and edema on T2 relaxation in skeletal muscle.  Magn Reson Med . 1997;  37 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Conley K E, Cress M E, Jubrias S A, Esselman P E, Odderson I R. From muscle properties to human performance, using magnetic resonance.  J Gerontol . 1995;  50A(Special Issue) 35-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Buckey J C, Peshock R M, Blomqvist C G. Deep venous contribution to hydrostatic blood volume change in the human leg.  Am J Cardiol . 1988;  62 449-453
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Damon B M, Gregory C D, Hall K L, Stark H J, Gulani V, Dawson M J. Intracellular acidification and volume increases explain R(2) decreases in exercising muscle.  Magn Reson Med . 2002;  47 14-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Saab G, Thompson R T, Marsh G D. Effects of exercise on muscle transverse relaxation determined by MR imaging and in vivo relaxometry.  J Appl Physiol . 2000;  88 226-233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Prior B M, Ploutz-Snyder L L, Cooper T G, Meyer R A. Fiber type and metabolic dependence of T2 increases in stimulated rat muscles.  J Appl Physiol . 2001;  90 615-623
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Reid R W, Foley J M, Jayaraman R C, Prior B M, Meyer R A. Effect of aerobic capacity on the T(2) increase in exercised skeletal muscle.  J Appl Physiol . 2001;  90 897-902
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kulig K, Powers C M, Shellock F G, Terk M. The effects of eccentric velocity on activation of elbow flexors: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.  Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2001;  33 196-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bratton C B, Hopkins A L, Weinberg J W. Nuclear magnetic studies of living muscle.  Science . 1965;  147 738-739
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 McCully K K, Boden B P, Tuchler M, Fountain M R, Chance B. Wrist flexor muscles of elite rowers measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy.  J Appl Physiol . 1989;  67 926-932
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Flicker P L, Fleckenstein J L, Ferry K. et al . Lumbar muscle usage in chronic low back pain. Magnetic resonance image evaluation.  Spine . 1993;  18 582-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Foley J M, Reid R W, Vaughn D W, Andary M T, Meyer R A. Assessment of motor unit pathology by functional MRI.  Med Sci Sports Exerc . 1999;  31 S207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Patten C, Srisethnil J, Asakawa D S, Gold G E. Imaging activation impairment in post-stroke hemiparesis. International Society of Magentic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, HI, 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Bickel C S, Slade J M, Dudley G A. Complete spinal cord injury increases susceptibility to isometric contraction induced muscle injury.  Neurology Report . 2002;  26 210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Adams G R, Harris R T, Woodard D, Dudley G A. Mapping of electrical muscle stimulation using MRI.  J Appl Physiol . 1993;  74 532-537
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Arokoski J P, Valta T, Airaksinen O, Kankaanpaa M. Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil . 2001;  82 1089-1098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Crossley K, Cowan S M, Bennell K L, McConnell J. Patellar taping: is clinical success supported by scientific evidence?.  Man Ther . 2000;  5 142-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gilleard W, McConnell J, Parsons D. The effect of patellar taping on the onset of vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis muscle activity in persons with patellofemoral pain.  Phys Ther . 1998;  78 25-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Murray W M, Bryden A M, Kilgore K L, Keith M W. The influence of elbow position on the range of motion of the wrist following transfer of the brachioradialis to the extensor carpi radialis brevis tendon.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2002;  84A 2203-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Sutherland D H, Zilberfarb J L, Kaufman K R, Wyatt M P, Chambers H G. Psoas release at the pelvic brim in ambulatory patients with cerebral palsy: operative technique and functional outcome.  J Pediatr Orthop . 1997;  17 563-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ogawa S, Menon R S, Kim S G, Ugurbil K. On the characteristics of functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct . 1998;  27 447-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Bauer W R, Nadler W, Bock M. et al . The relationship between the BOLD-induced T(2) and T(2)(*): a theoretical approach for the vasculature of myocardium.  Magn Reson Med . 1999;  42 1004-1010
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Burke R E. Motor units: anatomy, physiology, and functional organization. In: Brookhart JM, Mountcastle VB, Brooks VB, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Section I: The Nervous System, Volume II: Motor Control, Part I Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society 1981: 345-422
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Henneman E, Mendell L M. Functional organization of motoneuron pool and its inputs. In: Brookhart JM, Mountcastle VB, Brooks VB, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Section I: The Nervous System, Volume II: Motor Control, Part I Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society 1981: 423-507
    Google Scholar
  • 55 McComas A J, Upton A RM, Sica R EP. Functional changes in motorneurones of hemiparetic patients.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1973;  36 183-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Campbell M J, McComas A J, Petito F. Physiological changes in ageing muscles.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1973;  36 174-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >