Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 52(5): 261-267
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-821154
Original Cardiovascular

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Are Men Treated Better Than Women? Outcome of Male Versus Female Patients After CABG Using Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries[*]

B. Gansera1 , G. Gillrath1 , M. Lieber1 , I. Angelis1 , F. Schmidtler1 , B. M. Kemkes1
  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, City Hospital Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Received February 17, 2004

Publication Date:
06 October 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background: Apart from smaller native coronary arteries a lower number of anastomoses and a lower ITA incidence have been suggested as being responsible for the increased mortality in female patients compared to males. The aim of this study was to clarify whether the outcome of females might be a consequence of a different regimen in anastomosis and ITA frequency. Methods: We evaluated operative data and early outcome of 6906 patients with isolated CABG operated between 1/96 - 7/03 3064 out of 5381 males received bilateral ITA (BITA) vs. 750 of 1525 females. Single ITA (SITA) was performed in 2126 males and 704 females. Results: Demographic and operative data: average age for male patients was 64.0 ± 9.2 years, for females 68.5 ± 8.6 years (p < 0.05). The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in females (34.6 % vs. 27.4 %, p < 0.01). Body mass index (BMI, 26.6 vs. 27.4 mean), incidence of main stem stenosis (23.0 % vs. 23.5 %), ejection fraction < 40 % (7.8 % vs. 10.1 %), urgent or emergent operations (13.1 % vs. 11.3 %) and number of performed anastomoses (3.2 vs. 3.5 mean) showed no significant difference between males and females. Total ITA frequency did not differ (95.3 % vs. 96.5 %), but BITA frequency was significantly higher (56.9 % vs. 49.2 %, p < 0.01) in male patients. Overall 30-day mortality was 2.8 % for males vs. 4.1 % (p < 0.05) for females. Cardiac-related mortality was significantly higher in female patients (2.6 % vs. 1.1 %, p < 0.01). Non-cardiac-related mortality did not differ significantly. Graft-related mortality for males and females revealed 2.7 % in the BITA, 3.3 % in the SITA group and 6.9 % for patients without ITAs and reached statistical significance (p < 0.01) for SITA or BITA vs. the no-ITA group, but not for BITA vs. SITA grafting. Nevertheless cardiac-related mortality in male and female patients without an ITA graft was more than two-fold higher compared to these with single ITAs and more than three-fold higher compared to those with BITA grafting. Conclusions: Female gender, frequently associated with diabetes mellitus, presents a predictor for increased mortality in CABG. A discrimination of women with respect to a restriction of ITA grafting could be confirmed only for bilateral ITAs. The superior results of bilateral ITA grafts are independent of gender.

1 Presented at the 4th Joint Meeting of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamburg, February 15 - 18, 2004

References

  • 1 Edwards F H, Carey J S, Grover F L, Bero J W, Hartz R S. Impact of gender on coronary bypass operative mortality.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 125-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 O'Connor G T, Morton J R, Diehl M J. et al . Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.  Circulation. 1993;  88 2104-2110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Vaccarino V, Abramson J L, Veledar E, Weintraub W S. Sex differences in hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. Evidence for a higher mortality in younger women.  Circulation. 2002;  105 1176-1181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Butterworth J, James R, Prielipp R, Cerese J, Livingston J, Burnett D. Female gender associates with increased duration of intubation and length of stay after coronary artery surgery. CABG Clinical Benchmarking Database Participants.  Anesthesiology. 2000;  92 414-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vaccarino V, Lin Z Q, Kasl S V. et al . Gender differences in recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;  41 307-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Nardi P, Pellegrino A, De Paulis R. et al . Coronary heart surgery in women.  Ital Heart J. 2000;  1 537-542
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gansera B, Günzinger R, Angelis I. et al . End of the millennium - end of the single thoracic artery graft? Two thoracic arteries - standard for the next millennium?.  Thorac Cardiov Surg. 2001;  49 10-15
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gansera B, Schiller M, Kiask T, Angelis I, Neumaier-Prauser P, Kemkes B M. Internal thoracic artery versus vein grafting. Postoperative angiographic findings in symptomatic patients after 1000 days.  Thorac Cardiov Surg. 2003;  51 239-243
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Loop F D, Golding L R, Mac Millan J P, Cosgrove D M, Lytle B W, Sheldon W C. Coronary artery surgery in women compared with men: Analyses of risks and long-term results.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;  1 389-390
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ott R A, Gutfinger D E, Alimadadian H. et al . Conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: Why women take longer to recover.  J Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  42 311-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reinecke H, Roeder N, Schmid C. et al . Outcome of women is impaired in patients undergoing emergency coronary bypass grafting for failed PTCA.  Z Kardiol. 2001;  90 723-736
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sheifer S E, Canos M, Weinfurt K P. et al . Sex differences in coronary artery size assessed by intravascular ultrasound.  Am Heart J. 2000;  139 649-653
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barner H B. Double internal mammary-coronary artery bypass graft.  Arch Surg. 1974;  102 627-631
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M, Loop F D, Borsh J, Goormastic M, Taylor P C. Perioperative risk of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: Analysis of 500 cases from 1971 - 84.  Circulation. 1986;  74 37-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Capdeville M, Chamogeogarkis T, Lee J H. Effect of gender on outcomes of beating heart operations.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 1022-1025
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lytle B W, Blackstone E H, Loop F D. et al . Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;  117 855-872
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pick A W, Orszulak T A, Anderson B J. et al . Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10 years outcome analysis.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;  64 599-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kurlansky P A, Traad E A, Galbut D L, Singer S, Zucker M, Ebra G. Coronary bypass surgery in women: A long-term comparative study of quality of life after bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in men and women.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 1517-1525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Brown P P, Mack M J, Simon A W. et al . Outcomes experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in women.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;  74 2113-2119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 O'Rourke D J, Malenka D J, Olmstead E M. et al . Improved in-hospital mortality in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  71 507-511
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

1 Presented at the 4th Joint Meeting of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hamburg, February 15 - 18, 2004

M. D. Brigitte Gansera

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Klinikum Bogenhausen

Englschalkinger Straße 77

81925 Munich

Germany

Phone: + 498992702631

Fax: + 4989927026 05

Email: herzchirurgie@kh-bogenhausen.de

      >