Removal of a Foreign Body from the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract with a Flexible Endoscope: a Prospective Study

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: There have so far been no prospective studies on the value of flexible endoscopy for removing foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract. This study presents a clinical analysis of accidents with foreign bodies and prospectively evaluates the effectiveness of flexible endoscopy for removing them.
Patients and Methods: A total of 105 cases of foreign-body ingestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract were evaluated, 29 (27.6 %) in children and 76 (72.4 %) in adults. Thirty patients (28.5 %) had esophageal strictures.
Results: Thirty-nine of the foreign bodies (37.1 %) consisted of food and 66 (62.9 %) were not food-related. The success rate of foreign-body extraction using only a conventional flexible endoscope and accessories for treatment was 98.0 %, and with only a polypectomy snare and rat-toothed forceps it was 91.2 %. Complications at the moment of foreign-body removal occurred in nine patients (8.6 %); there was only one (1 %) esophageal perforation. The incidence of complications related to the duration of foreign-body impaction was six (10.5 %) with foreign bodies impacted for up to 24 h, 13 (52.0 %) for those impacted for 24 - 48 h, and three (60.0 %) for those impacted for 48 - 72 h (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: The flexible endoscope is an effective and safe device for removing foreign bodies from the upper gastrointestinal tract, with a high success rate using only the polypectomy snare and the rat-toothed forceps as accessories. If foreign-body impaction lasts for more than 24 h, there is a significant increase in the incidence of complications.

References

• 1 Brady P G. Management of esophageal and gastric foreign body. In: Dimarino AJ, Benjamin SB (eds.) Gastrointestinal disease: an endoscopic approach. London; Blackwell Science 1997: 407-417
  Google Scholar
• 2 Webb W A. Management of foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Gastroenterology. 1988;  94 204-216
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Schwartz G F, Polsky H S. Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract.  Am Surg. 1976;  42 236-238
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Berggreen P J, Harrison E, Sanowski R A. et al . Techniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in children and adults.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 626-630
  Google Scholar
• 5 Neustater B, Barkin M S. Extraction of an esophageal food impaction with a Roth retrieval net.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 66-67
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Werth R W, Edwards C, Jennings W C. A safe and quick method for endoscopic retrieval of multiple gastric foreign bodies using a protective sheath.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;  171 419-420
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Saeed Z A, Michaletz P A, Feiner S D. et al . A new endoscopic method for managing food impaction in the esophagus.  Endoscopy. 1990;  22 226-229
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Pezzi J S, Shiau Y F. A method for removing meat impactions from the esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 634-636
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Bertoni G, Sassatelli R, Conigliano R. A simple latex protector hood for safe endoscopic removal of sharp-pointed gastroesophageal foreign bodies.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 458-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kao L S, Nguyen T, Dominitz J. et al . Modification of a latex glove for the safe endoscopic removal of a sharp gastric foreign body.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 127-129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Nijhawan S, Shimpi L, Jain N K, Rai R R. Impacted foreign body at the pharyngoesophageal junction: an innovative management.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 353
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Vizcarrondo F J, Brady P G, Nord H J. Foreign bodies of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1983;  29 208-210
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Moral L Y, Morante A JL, Lorente J LM. et al . Terapeutica fibroendoscopica de los cuerpos extraños intraesofagicos.  Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1992;  81 95-98
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Blair S R, Graeber G M, Cruzzavala J L. et al . Current management of esophageal impactions.  Chest. 1993;  104 1205-1208
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Roura J, Morello A, Comas J. et al . Esophageal foreign bodies in adults.  J Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;  52 51-56
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Watanabe K, Kikuchi T, Katori Y. et al . The usefulness of computed tomography in the diagnosis of impacted fish bones in the oesophagus.  J Laryngol Otol. 1998;  112 360-364
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gonzales J H, Vidal J M, Sarandeses A G. et al . Esophageal foreign bodies in adults.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;  105 649-654
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Bendig D W, Mackie G G. Management of smooth-blunt gastric foreign bodies in asymptomatic patients.  Clin Pediatr. 1990;  29 642-645
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Selivanov V, Sheldon G F, Cello J P, Crass R A. Management of foreign body ingestion.  Ann Surg. 1984;  199 187-191
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ginsberg G G. Management of ingested foreign objects and food bolus impactions.  Gastrointest. Endosc1995;  41 33-38
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Litovitz T L, Schmitz B F. Ingestions of cylindrical and button batteries: an analysis of 2382 cases.  Pediatrics. 1992;  89 747-757
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Chaves D M, Ishioka S, Dantonio S. Corpos estranhos de esofago. In: Sakai P, Ishioka S, Maluf Filho F (eds.) Tratado de endoscopia digestiva: diagnostico e terapeutica. São Paulo; Atheneu 2000: 181-191
  Google Scholar
• 23 Singh B, Kantu M, Har-El G. et al . Complications associated with 327 foreign bodies of the pharynx, larynx, and esophagus.  Ann Otol Laryngol. 1997;  106 301-304
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Hawkins D B. Removal of blunt foreign bodies from the esophagus.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;  99 935-940
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Macpherson R I, Hill J G, Othersen H B. Esophageal foreign bodies in children: diagnosis, treatment, and complications.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  166 919-924
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Scher R L, Tegtmeyer C J, McLean W C. Vascular injury following foreign body perforation of the esophagus: review of the literature and report of a case.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;  99 698-702
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Yamada T, Sato H, Seki M. et al . Successful salvage of aortoesophageal fistula caused by a fish bone.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  61 1843-1845
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

D. M. Chaves, M. D.

Rua Montezuma 183 - Jd. das Bandeiras · São Paulo 05436-080 · Brazil ·

Fax: +55-11-30697579

Email: dalton.chaves@fleury.com.br