Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2005; 26(10): 886-890
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-837451
Clinical Sciences

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Effects of Low-Dosed and High-Dosed Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Microcirculation and Skin Temperature in Healthy Subjects

O. Schuhfried1 , G. Vacariu1 , H. Rochowanski1 , M. Serek1 , V. Fialka-Moser1
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted after revision: November 10, 2004

Publication Date:
09 May 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized double-blind cross-over study was to investigate whether a low-dosed pulsed low-frequency magnetic field or a high-dosed pulsed low-frequency magnetic field improves the cutaneous microcirculation and alters the temperature of the foot. Twelve healthy subjects (five women, seven men) aged on average 25.8 years participated in the trial. Based on a randomization list, one of the following three interventions was applied for 30 min through a cushion placed below the non-dominant foot: either a pulsed low-dosed magnetic field (100 uT, basic frequency 30 Hz with a frequency modulation) or a pulsed high-dosed magnetic field (8.4 mT, 10 Hz), or sham treatment. The individual treatment sessions were applied in intervals of one week, at the same time of the day. Cutaneous microcirculation (laser Doppler flowmetry) and temperature (infra-red thermovision) were measured in the dorsum of the foot and the great toe every 5 min during the intervention, and 5 and 10 min post-intervention. With both pulsed low-dosed magnetic field and pulsed high-dosed magnetic field, just as with the sham treatment, a minor drop in temperature and decrease in microcirculation took place. A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed no significant difference between the interventions for any parameter. It was concluded that a local application of a pulsed low-frequency magnetic field to the foot did not enhance temperature or cutaneous microcirculation in healthy subjects.

Key words

Infrared thermography - laser doppler flowmetry - magnetic field therapy

References

  • 1 Albertini A, Zucchini P, Noera G, Cadossi R, Napoleone C P, Pierangeli A. Protective effect of low frequency low energy pulsing electromagnetic fields on acute experimental myocardial infarcts in rats.  Bioelectromagnetics. 1999;  20 372-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Basset C A. Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutic uses of pulsed electromagnetic fields.  Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1989;  17 451-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Basset C A. Beneficial effects of electromagnetic fields.  J Cell Biochem. 1998;  51 387-393
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Berliner M N. Reduced skin hyperemia during tap water iontophoresis after intake of acetylsalicyl acid.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;  76 482-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bongard O, Fagrell B. Variations in laser Doppler flux and flow motion patterns in the dorsal skin of the human foot.  Microvasc Res. 1990;  39 212-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bricknell R, Watson T. The thermal effects of pulsed shortwave therapy.  Br J Therapy Rehabil. 1995;  2 430-434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cramp A FL, Gilsenan C, Lowe A S, Walsh D M. The effect of high and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation upon cutaneous blood flow and skin temperatures in healthy subjects.  Clin Physiol. 2000;  20 150-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fercher A F. Magnetismus. Fercher AF Medizinische Physik. Wien, New York; Springer Verlag 1999: 421-457
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Goodman R, Henderson A S. Some biological effects of electromagnetic fields.  Biochem Bioenerg. 1986;  15 39-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gossling H R, Bernstein R A, Abott J. Treatment of ununited tibial fractures: a comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF).  Orthopedics. 1992;  15 711-719
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Greenough C G. The effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on blood vessel growth in the rabbit ear chamber.  J Orthop Res. 1992;  10 256-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Guy A W. Biophysics of high frequency currents and electromagnetic radiation. Lehmann JF Therapeutic Heat and Cold. Baltimore; Williams & William 1982: 199-277
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Hulme J, Robinson V, DeBie R, Wells G, Judd M, Tugwell P. Electromagnetic fields for the treatment of osteoarthritis.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;  1 CD003523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kafka W A. Extremely low, wide frequency range pulsed electromagnetic fields for therapeutical use.  Emphyspace. 2000;  2 1-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McMeeken J M. Magnetic fields: Effects on blood flow in human subjects.  Physiother Theor Pract. 1992;  8 5-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nicolakis P, Kollmitzer J, Crevenna R, Bittner C, Erdogmus C B, Nicolakis J. Pulsed magnetic field therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee - a double-blind sham-controlled trial.  Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002;  114 678-684
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nilsson G E, Tenland T, Öberg P. Evaluation of laser doppler flowmeter for measurement of tissue blood flow.  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980;  27 597-604
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Quittan M, Schuhfried O, Wiesinger G F, Fialka-Moser V. Clinical effectiveness of magnetic field therapy - a review of the literature.  Acta Med Austr. 2000;  27 61-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Scudds R J, Helewa A, Scudds R A. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on skin temperature in asymptomatic subjects.  Phys Ther. 1995;  75 621-628
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sharrad W J. A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures.  J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;  72 347-355
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sherman R A, Woerman A L, Karstetter K W. Comparative effectiveness of videothermography, contact thermography, and infrared beam thermography for scanning relative skin temperature.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 1996;  33 377-386
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Smith T L, Wong-Gibbons D, Maultsby J. Microcirculatory effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields.  J Orthop Res. 2004;  22 80-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stiller M J, Pak G H, Shupack J L, Thaler S, Kenny C, Jondreau L. A portable pulsed electromagnetic field device (PEMF) to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.  Br J Dermatol. 1992;  127 147-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sweeney K B, Merril M A, Ingersoll C D, Swez J A. Therapeutic magnets do not affect tissue temperatures.  J Athlet Train. 2001;  36 27-31
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Trock D H, Bollet A J, Markoll R. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine. Report of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.  J Rheumatol. 1994;  21 1903-1911
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Van Nguyen J, Marks R. Pulsed electromagnetic fields for treating osteoarthritis.  Physiotherapy. 2002;  88 458-470
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wahlstrom O. Stimulation of a fracture healing with electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency (EMF or ELF).  Clin Orthop. 1984;  186 293-301
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Winet H. The role of microvasculature in normal and perturbed bone healing as revealed by intravital microscopy.  Bone. 1996;  1 39-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Xu S, Okano H, Ohkubo C. Acute effects of whole-body exposure to static magnetic fields and 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on muscle microcirculation in anesthetized mice.  Bioelectrochemistry. 2001;  53 127-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

O. Schuhfried

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Vienna, Allgemeines Krankenhaus

Waehringer Guertel 18 - 20

1090 Vienna

Austria

Phone: + 404002308

Fax: + 40 4 00 52 81

Email: othmar.schuhfried@univie.ac.at

      >