Validation of a New Portable Ergospirometric Device (Oxycon Mobile®) During Exercise

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy of a new portable spirometric-telemetric device (Oxycon Mobile®) over a wide range of exercise intensities against an accurate stationary apparatus (Oxycon Pro®). Therefore, fifteen endurance-trained subjects (V·O_2peak: 58.8 ± 5.2 ml · min^-1 · kg^-1) performed an incremental as well as an endurance exercise test on two different occasions. Gas exchange variables were measured by the two ergospirometric devices simultaneously. For this purpose, a special face mask was designed which allowed respiratory gas sampling with both devices at exactly the same time. Compared to the Oxycon Pro® as an accurate reference system, the Oxycon Mobile® showed significantly lower values for V·O₂ at 200 and 250 W during the incremental exercise test. For V·CO₂ no significant differences were found although the Oxycon Mobile® seemed to systematically measure higher values. With regard to RER the Oxycon Mobile® showed significantly higher values at all workloads tested. We therefore dissuade from comparing gas exchange variables collected by the Oxycon Mobile® with data measured under laboratory conditions by an accurate reference system like the Oxycon Pro®. Furthermore, the extrapolation of information about substrate utilization during different exercise durations and intensities from data measured by the Oxycon Mobile® seems inappropriate.

References

• 1 Beneke R, Sievers U, Buschkow S, Erasmus J. Portables Spirometrie-Telemetrie-System vs. Laborspirometer - Gerätevergleich unter Laborbedingungen.  Dt Z Sportmed. 1995;  46 403-408
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Crandall C G, Taylor S L, Raven P B. Evaluation of the Cosmed K2 portable telemetric oxygen uptake analyzer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;  26 108-111
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hausswirth C, Bigard A X, Le Chevalier J M. The Cosmed K4 telemetry system as an accurate device for oxygen uptake measurements during exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 449-453
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 King G A, McLaughlin J E, Howley E T, Bassett Jr D R, Ainsworth B E. Validation of Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic system.  Int J Sports Med. 1999;  20 304-308
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lothian F, Farrally M R, Mahoney C. Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 to measure oxygen uptake.  Can J Appl Physiol. 1993;  18 197-206
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Lucia A, Fleck S J, Gotshall R W, Kearney J T. Validity and reliability of the Cosmed K2 instrument.  Int J Sports Med. 1993;  14 380-386
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Macfarlane D. Automated metabolic gas analysis systems. A Review.  Sports Med. 2001;  31 841-861
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 McLaughlin J E, King G A, Howley E T, Bassett Jr D R, Ainsworth B E. Validation of the Cosmed K4b² portable metabolic system.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 280-284
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Melanson E L, Freedson P S, Hendelman D, Debold E. Reliability and validity of a portable metabolic measurement system.  Can J Appl Physiol. 1996;  21 109-119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Meyer T, Georg T, Becker C, Kindermann W. Reliability of gas exchange measurements from two different spiroergometry systems.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 593-597
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Novitsky S, Segal K R, Chatr-Aryamontri B, Guvakov D, Katch V L. Validity of a new portable indirect calorimeter: the AeroSport TEEM 100.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1995;  70 462-467
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Peel C, Utsey C. Oxygen consumption using the K2 telemetry system and a metabolic cart.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  25 396-400
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rietjens G JWM, Kuipers H, Kester A DM, Keizer H A. Validation of a computerized metabolic measurement system (Oxycon-Pro®) during low and high intensity exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 2001;  22 291-294
  Google Scholar
• 15 Schulz H, Helle S, Heck H. The validity of the telemetric system Cortex X1 in the ventilatory and gas exchange measurement during exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 454-457
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Smekal G, Pokan R, von Duvillard S P, Baron R, Tschan H, Bachl N. Comparison of laboratory and “on-court” endurance testing in tennis.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 242-249
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Wideman L, Stoudemire N M, Pass K A, McGinnes C L, Gaesser G A, Weltman A. Assessment of the Aerosport TEEM 100 portable metabolic measurement system.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;  28 509-515
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

C. Perret

Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Institute for Clinical Research

6207 Nottwil

Switzerland

Phone: + 41419395697

Fax: + 41 4 19 39 66 67

Email: claudio.perret@paranet.ch