Improved Colonoscopy Success Rate with a Distally Attached Mucosectomy Cap

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Although colonoscopy is a well-established procedure, various technical difficulties may cause failure. This report describes experience with cap-assisted colonoscopy (CAC), a technique in which a mucosectomy cap is attached to the end of colonoscope in order to improve the success rate.
Patients and Methods: From January 2003 to May 2005, CAC was used in consecutive patients with difficult colonoscopy procedures, which were defined firstly as failure to pass through the sigmoid colon after 20 min of examination, or secondly as failure to reach the cecum at the end of the procedure. Patients with prior colonic surgery, poor bowel preparation, distal colonic stricture, or obstructing tumors were excluded. The results with the CAC method were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: A total of 100 patients met the criteria for difficult colonoscopy during the study period. When CAC was used to repeat the procedure, cecal and terminal ileal intubation could then be achieved in 94 and 70 patients, respectively. In the remaining six patients in whom cecal intubation failed, one failure was due to a tumor obstruction at the splenic flexure.
Conclusions: CAC can be used as a rescue method to improve the success rate of colonoscopy when failure is encountered.

References

• 1 Church J M. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 556-560
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cirocco W C, Rusin L C. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 964-968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Saunders B P, Fukumoto M, Halligan S. et al . Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 124-126
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Anderson J C, Messina C R, Cohn W. et al . Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 558-562
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Wexner S D, Garbus J E, Singh J J. SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group . A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: reevaluation of credentialing guidelines.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 251-261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M. A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 172-179
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Kozarek R A, Botoman V A, Patterson D J. Prospective evaluation of a small caliber upper endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful standard examination.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 333-335
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Lichtenstein G R, Park P D, Long W B. et al . Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 187-190
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King P D. et al . Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 314-317
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Williams C B. et al . Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet. 2000;  356 1718-1722
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Raju G S, Rex D K, Kozarek R A. et al . A novel shape-locking guide for prevention of sigmoid looping during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 416-419
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Marshall J B. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 287-291
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Shumaker D A, Zaman A, Katon R M. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 711-714
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rex D K, Goodwine B W. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1148-1151
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kaffes A J, Mishra A, Ding S L. et al . A prospective trial of variable stiffness pediatric vs. standard instrument colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 685-689
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Tada M, Inoue H, Yabata E. et al . Feasibility of the transparent cap-fitted colonoscope for screening and mucosal resection.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 618-621
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K. et al . Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 444-447
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Dafnis G M. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 381-384
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar

Y. T. Lee, M. D.

Dept. of Medicine and Therapeutics

Chinese University of Hong Kong · Prince of Wales Hospital · Shatin · New Territories · Hong Kong · China

Fax: +852-2637-5396

Email: leeytong@cuhk.edu.hk