A Case of Retroperitoneal Ectopic Pregnancy following IVF-ET in a Patient with Previous Bilateral Salpingectomy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The numbers of ectopic pregnancies have increased because of the popularization of assisted reproductive techniques. However, the retroperitoneal space is an exceptional location for ectopic pregnancy because the entrance to the retroperitoneal space is unknown. A woman 31 years of age who had received bilateral salpingectomy because of a right tubal ectopic pregnancy and a left hydrosalpinx 4 years earlier was treated by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a gestational sac attached to the inferior vena cava in the midabdomen of the retroperitoneal space. Single-dose methotrexate administration was administered twice. However, because of sudden upper abdominal pain with a drastic decline of hemoglobin, an emergent laparotomy was performed. The hematoma and a gestational sac were removed from the aorta and inferior vena cava. Ectopic pregnancy following IVF-ET in a patient with bilateral salpingectomy is likely to be the cause of implantation at this unusual site. An unusual ectopic pregnancy has a high risk of life-threatening massive bleeding. Intensive transabdominal ultrasound scanning and whole abdominal MRI should be performed for the early diagnosis of unruptured ectopic pregnancy.

REFERENCES

• 1 Assisted reproductive technology in the United States. 1997 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  74 641-653
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Agarwal S K, Wisot A L, Garzo G, Meldrum D R. Cornual pregnancies in patients with prior salpingectomy undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.  Fertil Steril. 1996;  65 659-660
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Fisch B, Peled Y, Kaplan B, Zehavi S, Neri A. Abdominal pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy.  Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  88 642-643
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Chin H Y, Chen F P, Wang C J, Shui L T, Liu Y H, Soong Y K. Heterotopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;  86 411-416
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Dmowski W P, Rana N, Ding J, Wu W T. Retroperitoneal subpancreatic ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization in a patient with previous bilateral salpingectomy: How did it get there?.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;  19 90-93
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Reid F, Steel M. An exceptionally rare ectopic pregnancy.  BJOG. 2003;  110 222-223
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hall J S, Harris M, Levy R C, Walrond E R. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy.  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1973;  80 92-94
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Sotus P C. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: a case report.  JAMA. 1977;  238 1363-1364
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Savitskii A G. Retroperitoneal pregnancy.  Akush Ginekol (Mosk). 1978;  2 63-64
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ferland R J, Chadwick D A, O'Brien J A, Granai III C O. An ectopic pregnancy in the upper retroperitoneum following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.  Obstet Gynecol. 1991;  78 544-546
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Lazarov L. A rare case of a retroperitoneally situated extrauterine pregnancy.  Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1993;  32 40-41
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Terrier J P, Garcia S, Hardwigsen J, D'Ercole C, Andrac-Meyer L, Charpin C. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: report of a case.  Ann Pathol. 1998;  18 201-202
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lee J W, Sohn K M, Jung H S. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 1600-1601
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

Seiji TsutsumiM.D. Ph.D. 

Yamagata University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

2-2-2 Iida-Nishi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan