Endoscopy 2007; 39(4): 325-332
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966233
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Publication bias does not play a role in the reporting of the results of endoscopic ultrasound staging of upper gastrointestinal cancers

E.  P.  M.  van Vliet1 , M.  J.  C.  Eijkemans2 , E.  J.  Kuipers1 , J.  W.  Poley1 , E.  W.  Steyerberg2 , P.  D.  Siersema1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • 2Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 20 April 2006

accepted after revision 12 October 2006

Publication Date:
11 April 2007 (online)

Background and study aim: An overestimation of the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) results in rectal cancer staging has been reported recently, which was found to be caused by the selective reporting of more positive results. In this study, we assessed whether publication bias was also present in the reporting of EUS staging results in upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods: A Medline literature search was performed. English-language articles containing information on the accuracy of EUS for T staging and/or N staging of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer were included. Articles published in abstract form only, case reports, and reviews were excluded. Studies reporting EUS results of patients who had undergone preoperative radiation and/or chemotherapy were also excluded. EUS results were plotted against numbers of patients, year of publication, journal type, and journal impact factor.

Results: The plots of the numbers of patients against accuracies for T stage and N stage and the statistical analyses showed no evidence of publication bias with regard to upper gastrointestinal cancer. The reported accuracy of EUS for the T stage of esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer declined slightly over the years, but this was statistically significant only in the case of esophageal cancer (P = 0.01). No statistically significant correlations were found for N staging for any of the three types of cancer. In addition, no correlations were found between EUS results and journal type or journal impact factor.

Conclusion: No evidence was found for the selective reporting of more positive EUS results for esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer staging, which suggests that publication bias was not present.

References

  • 1 Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A. et al . Cancer statistics, 2003.  CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;  53 5-26
  • 2 Vickers J, Alderson D. Oesophageal cancer staging using endoscopic ultrasonography.  Br J Surg. 1998;  85 994-998
  • 3 Maerz L L, Deveney C W, Lopez R R, McConnell D B. Role of computed tomographic scans in the staging of esophageal and proximal gastric malignancies.  Am J Surg. 1993;  165 558-560
  • 4 van Overhagen H, Lameris J S, Berger M Y. et al . Assessment of distant metastases with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and cytologic study in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1992;  17 305-310
  • 5 Stein H J, Brucher B L, Sendler A, Siewert J R. Esophageal cancer: patient evaluation and pre-treatment staging.  Surg Oncol. 2001;  10 103-111
  • 6 Riedel M, Hauck R W, Stein H J. et al . Preoperative bronchoscopic assessment of airway invasion by esophageal cancer: a prospective study.  Chest. 1998;  113 687-695
  • 7 Wakelin S J, Deans C, Crofts T J. et al . Comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma.  Eur J Radiol. 2002;  41 161-167
  • 8 Rösch T. Endosonographic staging of esophageal cancer: a review of literature results.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1995;  5 537-547
  • 9 Kelly S, Harris K M, Berry E. et al . A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma.  Gut. 2001;  49 534-539
  • 10 Botet J F, Lightdale C J, Zauber A G. et al . Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT.  Radiology. 1991;  181 426-432
  • 11 Lim J H, Ko Y T, Lee D H. Transabdominal US staging of gastric cancer.  Abdom Imaging. 1994;  19 527-531
  • 12 Sohn K M, Lee J M, Lee S Y. et al . Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;  174 1551-1557
  • 13 Sotiropoulos G C, Kaiser G M, Lang H. et al . Staging laparoscopy in gastric cancer.  Eur J Med Res. 2005;  10 88-91
  • 14 Kuntz C, Herfarth C. Imaging diagnosis for staging of gastric cancer.  Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;  17 96-102
  • 15 Palazzo L, Roseau G, Gayet B. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 143-150
  • 16 Rösch T, Lorenz R, Braig C. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic tumor diagnosis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 347-352
  • 17 Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C. et al . Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 492-501
  • 18 Snady H. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic tumors.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 182-184
  • 19 Hunt G C, Faigel D O. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 232-237
  • 20 Arcidiacono P G, Carrara S. Endoscopic ultrasonography: impact in diagnosis, staging and management of pancreatic tumors: an overview.  JOP. 2004;  5 247-252
  • 21 Harewood G C. Assessment of publication bias in the reporting of EUS performance in staging rectal cancer.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 808-816
  • 22 Laterza E, de Manzoni G, Guglielmi A. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma after preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 1466-1469
  • 23 Beseth B D, Bedford R, Isacoff W H. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound does not accurately assess pathologic stage of esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.  Am Surg. 2000;  66 827-831
  • 24 Terrin N, Schmid C H, Lau J. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;  58 894-901
  • 25 Duignan J P, McEntee G P, O’Connell D J. et al . The role of CT in the management of carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia.  Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987;  69 286-288
  • 26 Sondenaa K, Skaane P, Nygaard K, Skjennald A. Value of computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of resectability and staging in oesophageal carcinoma.  Eur J Surg. 1992;  158 537-540
  • 27 Sharma O P, Chandermohan , Mashankar A S. et al . Role of computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of esophageal carcinoma.  Indian J Cancer. 1994;  31 12-18
  • 28 Shami V M, Waxman I. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in esophageal cancer.  Minerva Chir. 2002;  57 811-818
  • 29 Koutsomanis D, Papakonstantinou V. Fractal-assisted EUS image-analysis in the evaluation of variceal eradication after elastic band ligation.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;  46 3142-3147
  • 30 Rice T W, Blackstone E H, Adelstein D J. et al . Role of clinically determined depth of tumor invasion in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;  125 1091-1102
  • 31 Lightdale C J, Kulkarni K G. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging and follow-up of esophageal cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2005;  23 4483-4489
  • 32 Ohtsu A. Chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: current status and perspectives.  Int J Clin Oncol. 2004;  9 444-450
  • 33 Gamliel Z, Krasna M J. Multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer.  Surg Clin North Am. 2005;  85 621-630
  • 34 DeWitt J, Kesler K, Brooks J A. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: impact of increased use of primary neoadjuvant therapy on preoperative locoregional staging accuracy.  Dis Esophagus. 2005;  18 21-27
  • 35 van Vliet E P, Eijkemans M J, Poley J W. et al . Staging of esophageal carcinoma in a low-volume EUS center compared with reported results from high-volume centers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 938-947
  • 36 Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U. et al . Routine use of transrectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma: results of a prospective multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 385-390
  • 37 Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee S H. et al . Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in preoperative staging of rectal tumors.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;  45 10-15
  • 38 Mackay S G, Pager C K, Joseph D. et al . Assessment of the accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography in anorectal neoplasia.  Br J Surg. 2003;  90 346-350

P. D. Siersema, MD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam

PO Box 2040

3000 CA Rotterdam

The Netherlands

Fax: +31-10-4634682

Email: p.siersema@erasmusmc.nl

>