HOX Genes in Implantation

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Implantation is a complex event requiring synchronization between a developing embryo and receptive endometrium. This process is governed by molecular mechanism mediated by homeobox (Hox) genes, which encode transcription factors. These factors guide embryologic development as well as regulate differential gene expression within the endometrium with each menstrual cycle. Spatiotemporal aberrations in HOX gene expression as seen with polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, hydrosalpinges, and endocrine disrupters compromise implantation. The role of HOX genes and their products continues to be explored as animal models that demonstrate implantation-specific infertile phenotypes continue to be investigated.

REFERENCES

• 1 Aplin J D. The cell biological basis of human implantation.  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;  14 757-764
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Red-Horse K, Zhou Y, Genbacev O et al.. Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface.  J Clin Invest. 2004;  114 744-754
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Achache H, Revel A. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation.  Hum Reprod Update. 2006;  12 731-746
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Taylor H S, Vandenheuvel G B, Igarashi P. A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system - late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes.  Biol Reprod. 1997;  57 1338-1345
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Lewis R W, Brooks N, Milburn G M et al.. The effects of the phytoestrogen genistein on the postnatal development of the rat.  Toxicol Sci. 2003;  71 74-83
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development.  Cell. 1994;  78 191-201
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 McGinnis W, Garber R L, Wirz J, Kuroiwa A, Gehring W J. A homologous protein-coding sequence in Drosophila homeotic genes and its conservation in other metazoans.  Cell. 1984;  37 403-408
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 McGinnis W, Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning.  Cell. 1992;  68 283-302
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kappen C, Schughart K, Ruddle F H. Early evolutionary origin of major homeodomain sequence classes.  Genomics. 1993;  18 54-70
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Barnhart K T, Dunsmoor R, Coutifaris C. The effect of endometriosis on IVF outcome.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  77 1148-1155
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Carlber M, Nejaty J, Froysa B. Elevated expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha in cultured granulosa cells from women with endometriosis.  Hum Reprod. 2000;  15 1250-1255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Giudice L C, Tazuke S I, Swiersz L. Status of current research on endometriosis.  J Reprod Med. 1998;  43 252-262
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Hertig A T, Rock J, Adams E C. A description of 34 human ova within the first 17 days of development.  Am J Anat. 1956;  98 435-491
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Schughart K, Kappen C, Ruddle F H. Mammalian homeobox-containing genes: genome organization, structure, expression and evolution.  Br J Cancer Suppl. 1988;  9 9-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kappen C. Disruption of the homeobox gene Hoxb-6 in mice results in increased numbers of early erythrocyte progenitors.  Am J Hematol. 2000;  65 111-118
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Taylor H S. The role of HOX genes in human implantation.  Hum Reprod Update. 2000;  6 75-79
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 DeCherney A H, Cholst I, Naftolin F. Structure and function of the fallopian tubes following exposure to diethylstilbestrol (DES) during gestation.  Fertil Steril. 1981;  36 741-745
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Block K, Kardana A, Igarashi P, Taylor H S. In utero diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure alters Hox gene expression in the developing mullerian system.  FASEB J. 2000;  14 1101-1108
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Taylor H S, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P. HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium.  J Clin Invest. 1998;  101 1379-1384
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Taylor H S, Igarashi P, Olive D, Arici A. Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in human peri-implantation endometrium.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;  84 1129-1135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ma L, Benson G V, Lim H, Dev S K, Maas R L. Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in mullerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES).  Dev Biol. 1998;  197 141-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Taylor H S, Bagot C, Kardana A, Olive D L, Arici A. HOX gene expression is altered in the endometrium of women with endometriosis.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 1328-1331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Benson G V, Lim H, Paria B C, Satokata I, Dey S K, Maas R L. Mechanisms of reduced fertility in Hoxa-10 mutant mice: uterine homeosis and loss of maternal Hoxa-10 expression.  Development. 1996;  122 2687-2696
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Satokata I, Benson G, Maas R. Sexually dimorphic sterility phenotypes in Hoxa10 deficient mice.  Nature. 1995;  374 460-463
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Hsieh-Li H M, Witte D P, Weinstein M et al.. Hoxa11 structure, extensive antisense transcription, and function in male and female fertility.  Development. 1995;  121 1373-1385
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Gendron R L, Paradis H, Hsieh-Li H M, Lee D W, Potter S S. Abnormal uterine stromal and glandular function associated with maternal reproductive defects in Hoxa-11 null mice.  Biol Reprod. 1997;  56 1097-1105
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Cermik D, Selam B, Taylor H S. Regulation of HOXA10 expression by testosterone in vitro and in the endometrium of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;  88 238-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Bagot C N, Troy P J, Taylor H S. Alteration of maternal Hoxa10 expression by in vivo gene transfection affects implantation.  Gene Ther. 2000;  7 1378-1384
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Daftary G S, Taylor H S. Efficient liposome mediated gene transfection and expression in the intact human uterus.  Hum Gene Ther. 2001;  12 2121-2127
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Daftary G S, Taylor H S. Reproductive tract gene transfer.  Fertil Steril. 2003;  80 475-484
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Farrer-Brown G, Beilby J O, Tarbit M H. Venous changes in the endometrium of myomatous uterus.  Obstet Gynecol. 1971;  38 743-751
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Stewart E A, Nowak R A. Leiomyoma-related bleeding: a classic hypothesis updated for the molecular era.  Hum Reprod Update. 1996;  2 295-306
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F et al.. Pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 1243-1249
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Granot I, Dekel N, Segal I, Fieldust S, Shoham Z, Barash A. Is hydrosalpinx fluid cytotoxic?.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 1620-1624
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Strandell A, Sjogren A, Bentin-Ley U, Thorburn J, Hamberger L, Brannstrom M. Hydrosalpinx fluid does not adversely affect the normal development of human embryos and implantation in vitro.  Hum Reprod. 1998;  13 2921-2925
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Murray C A, Clarke H J, Tulandi T, Tan S L. Inhibitory effect of human hydrosalpingeal fluid on mouse preimplantation embryonic development is significantly reduced by the addition of lactate.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 2504-2507
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Daftary G S, Taylor H S. Hydrosalpinx fluid diminishes endometrial HOXA10 expression.  Fertil Steril. 2002;  78 577-580
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Lessey B A, Castelbaum A JU, Sawin S W, Sun J. Integrins as markers of uterine receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility.  Fertil Steril. 1995;  63 535-542
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Meyer W R, Castelbaum A J, Somkuti S et al.. Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 1393-1398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Mansour R T, Aboulghar M A, Serour G I, Riad R. Fluid accumulation in the uterine cavity before embryo transfer: a possible hindrance for implantation.  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1991;  8 157-159
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Fazleabas A T, Kim J J, Strakova Z. Implantation: embryonic signals and the modulation of the uterine environment-a review.  Placenta. 2004;  25(suppl A) S26-S31
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Giudice L C, Swiersz L, Tazuke S I. Status of current research on endometriosis.  J Reprod Med. 1998;  43 252-262
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Fowler D J, Nicolaides K H, Miell J P. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1): a multifunctional role in the human female reproductive tract.  Hum Reprod Update. 2000;  6 495-504
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Kim J J, Taylor H S, Akbas G E et al.. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 promoter activity by FKHR and HOXA10 in primate endometrial cells.  Biol Reprod. 2003;  68 24-30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Tomita S, Li R K, Weisel R D et al.. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow cells improves damaged heart function.  Circulation. 1999;  100 II247-II256
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Akbas G E, Song J, Taylor H SA. HOXA10 estrogen response element (ERE) is differentially regulated by 17 beta estradiol and diethylstilbestrol (DES).  J Mol Biol. 2004;  340 1013-1023
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Martin R, Taylor M B, Krikun G, Lockwood C, Akbas G E, Taylor H S. Differential cell-specific modulation of HOXA10 by estrogen and specificity protein 1 response elements.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;  92 1920-1926
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Daftary G S, Taylor H S. Endocrine regulation of HOX genes.  Endocr Rev. 2006;  27 331-355
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Troy P J, Daftary G S, Bagot C N, Taylor H S. Transcriptional repression of peri-implantation EMX2 expression in mammalian reproduction by HOXA10.  Mol Cell Biol. 2003;  23 1-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Carson D D, Lagow E, Thathiah A et al.. Changes in gene expression during the early to mid-luteal (receptive) phase transition in human endometrium detected by high-density microarray screening.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;  8 871-879
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Giudice L C. Application of functional genomics to primate endometrium: insights into biological processes.  Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;  4(suppl 1) S4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Giudice L C, Telles T L, Lobo S, Kao L. The molecular basis for implantation failure in endometriosis: on the road to discovery.  Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;  955 252-264
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Cross J C, Werb Z, Fischer S J. Implantation and the placenta: key pieces of the development puzzle.  Science. 1994;  266 1508-1518
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Dey S K, Lim H, Das S K et al.. Molecular cues to implantation.  Endocr Rev. 2004;  25 341-373
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Rossant J, Cross J C. Placental development: lessons from mouse mutants.  Nat Rev Genet. 2001;  2 538-548
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Carter A M. Animal models of human placentation-a review.  Placenta. 2007;  28(suppl A) 41-47
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Lee K Y, DeMayo F J. Animal models of implantation.  Reproduction. 2004;  128 679-695
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Hugh S TaylorM.D. 

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Yale University School of Medicine

333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520

Email: hugh.taylor@yale.edu