A New Concept and Technique for Custom-Made Microvascular Lunate Bone Reconstruction

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Kienböck's disease is always a challenge, especially when the lunate is already fragmented. Despite the numerous methods to treat this wrist problem, results have often not been satisfactory. Swanson's silastic lunate prosthesis has not been a helpful solution for most patients over the long term, and problems with artificial material have also become apparent. A proposal to create an autogenous microvascular total lunate bone reconstruction is presented. The second metatarsophalangeal joint was used in a new fashion to create a biologic substitute for the lunate bone. This is called a “neolunate.” The lunate bones and neolunates created from the second metatarsophalangeal joints of fresh cadavers were compared. The possibilities of microvascular access to create a neolunate and its use in wrist reconstruction were studied in ten cadaveric wrists. The lunates and neolunates were compared. After a neolunate reconstruction, the specimen was inserted into the original cadaveric wrist and the ligamentous structures were repaired. The necessary architecture for ligament stability to prevent subluxation and DISI or VISI deformity was established. Radiological measurements confirmed the neolunate as a suitable model. The result was close to normal wrist configuration. So far, only one clinical trial using the proposed technique has been done. The proposed microsurgical neolunate transfer needs further clinical testing to prove its potential value. A disadvantage is that the method is technically demanding.

REFERENCES

• 1 Lichtman D M, Degnan G G. Staging and its use in the determination of treatment modalities for Kienbock's disease.  Hand Clin. 1993;  9 409-416
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Daecke W, Lorenz S, Wieloch P, Jung M, Martini A K. Vascularized os pisiform for reinforcement of the lunate in Kienbock's disease: an average of 12 years of follow-up study.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;  30 915-922
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Moran S L, Cooney W P, Berger R A, Bishop A T, Shin A Y. The use of the 4 + 5 extensor compartmental vascularized bone graft for the treatment of Kienbock's disease.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;  30 50-58
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Vilkki S K, Salonen E J. Experimental models for microsurgical joint reconstruction in the upper extremity.  Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995;  24 58-62
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Vilkki S K. Advances in microsurgical reconstruction of the congenitally adactylous hand.  Clin Ortop. 1995;  314 45-58
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Vilkki S K. Vascularized joint transfer for radial club hand.  Techniques in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery. 1998;  2 126-137
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Vilkki S K. Distraction and microvascular epiphysis transfer for radial club hand.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1998;  23B 445-452
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Lin Y T, Berger R A, Berger E J et al.. Nerve endings of the wrist joint: a preliminary report of the dorsal radiocarpal ligament.  J Orthop Res. 2006;  24 1225-1230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lichtman D M, Wroten E S. Understanding midcarpal instability.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;  31 491-498
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Garcia-Elias M, Lluch A L, Stanley J K. Three-ligament tenodesis for the treatment of scapholunate dissociation: indications and surgical technique.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;  31 125-134
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Tang J B, Xie R G, Yu X W, Chen F. Wrist kinetics after luno-triquetral dissociation: the changes in moment arms of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon.  J Orthop Res. 2002;  20 1327-1332
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Viljakka T, Vastamaki M, Solonen K A, Tallroth K. Silicone implant arthroplasty in Kienbock's disease.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;  58 410-414
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bray P W, Neligan P C, Bowen C V, Danska J S, Boyer M I. Development and validation of new model for microvascular transplantation of epiphyseal plate allografts with minimal adjoining epiphyseal and metaphyseal bone.  Microsurgery. 2003;  23 153-163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Simo Vilkki

Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Tampere University Hospital

FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland